JJJJNR wrote: » So another h&s pattern has formed on bitcoin, this time bigger than before. Buy signal usually but don't take my word on it.
JJJJNR wrote: » inverse head and shoulders pattern has just completed with an uptrend. I think it's a good sign.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Wasn’t this a site you dismissed only 20 minutes ago? It’s my understanding that this is a widely respected tech website, with articles written in a slight tongue in cheek style. It also would appear to allow differing opinions - always a good sign..... Probably more FUD, but the ECB today launched this: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/target/tips/html/index.en.html It enables payment service providers to offer fund transfers to their customers in real time and around the clock, every day of the year. This means that thanks to TIPS, individuals and firms can transfer money between each other within seconds, irrespective of the opening hours of their local bank. It costs .2 of a cent per transaction and takes less than 10 seconds for the end to end process. It doesn’t use blockchain.
JJJJNR wrote: » This is a much better article.https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/16/people_blockchain_and_a_decentralised_web/
JohnnyFlash wrote: » I saw this link while browsing Twitter.https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/11/30/blockchain_study_finds_0_per_cent_success_rate/ It’s a very good read, and written in an unashamedly snarky way. What does everyone else think? Amazon and Microsoft both have a blockchain offering in their respective clouds that allow customers to experiment with the tech without having to make a big investment. But is the wind leaving the sails of blockchain in general? When you see disrupters like Stripe and UBER say they are stopping pilots then you’d have to wonder wouldn’t you?
A 99% failure rate with a current slate of 50-plus deep-learning projects is acceptable because “that 1% is going to bring exponential gain,” Ms. Gupta told a crowd of enterprise IT managers gathered here at an AI industry conference.
sabat wrote: » So I assume this basic knowledge also predicted the current 7.61% drop today?What we have been witnessing since January is a controlled demolition job; I just find it hard to believe some people still can't accept that this was a bubble that has now burst.
JJJJNR wrote: » Basic analysis in full show anyone with basic knowledge could see an uptick was imminent.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » HODLING until I’m in easy street.
JJJJNR wrote: Go way with your pyramid scheme.
Sleeper12 wrote: » If you believe that I'd be happy to sell you a land plot on Mars. Or one for the price of two if you want a really good deal.
JJJJNR wrote: Basic analysis in full show anyone with basic knowledge could see an uptick was imminent.
Sabre0001 wrote: » Seems to have hit some sort of bounce. People picking up coins on the cheap, people going for quick profits as other people get back on the bandwagon, or the start of a recovery? Time will tell. Not "worried" - threw in very little and not any more than I was willing to lose. Won't be a millionaire off it, but curious to see where it goes.
el diablo wrote: » Report this piece of garbage. He's only here to troll. Sounds like an extremely bitter and twisted individual.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Buy low, sell high. That’s the secret.
JJJJNR wrote: » if that happens you haven't completed due diligence. It's your money at the end of the day. Need an entry and an exit strategy. Research is key don't suffer fomo.
JJJJNR wrote: » The planet is already racing towards mass extinction because of fukushima never mind crypto ye tick.
Woke Hogan wrote: » I am the poster you are referring to. It's bad enough this forum's greedy pro-cryptocurrency mob is poisoning the planet and sending our species racing towards the precipice of extinction but you animals actually have the temerity to race in here and besmirch my posts posted in another forum. The cryptofans in this forum is as bad as humanity has to offer. I only wish I still had my faith, so I could bear divine witness to your condemnity to Perdition.
smacl wrote: » it is a pretty safe bet they'd still be looking down from a considerable height at those advocating suicide for people down on their luck.