drunkmonkey wrote: » The XS Max is a good few hrs shy of the current competitions battery life. So I don't get moving to iPhone for better battery especially when it's just shy of €1300 for the entry level model. Mate 20 pro is a long way ahead of it for battery but that phone has its own problems. I'll get a few days out of my own if I wind back the screen to the iPhones 60hz, knock off the chromo logo etc. Said it before give me a 120hz screen in an iPhone and a battery to get me through the weekend and I'll consider jumping back. Stuck now in the gamer phone Sphere as used to the speed at which I can use the phone day to day, nothing to do with gaming. Only the Rog and Razer to choose from. Hopefully it trickles down to other phones but have my doubts as OLED can't don't 120hz, Rog can do 90hz which is good enough. 60hz is just to much of a step back, frustrating to use I've tried.
Blazer wrote: » Look back over the last 30-40 pages and this guy has been constantly at it. I'm pretty sure if I kept that up in the android forum I would be banned from it but that probably is because their tiny little minds couldn't handle the truth and they're the real sheep.
DubDJ wrote: » That’s a bit harsh, in all fairness somebody did ask for opinions on an iPhone versus and Android phone. Everybody is going to be subjective when making these comparisons. I have seen the iPad screen and it is impressive, it would probably be hard to go to anything less after using the 120Hz refresh. But for me, the design, smaller bezels and cameras are all better things to have on the iPhone. It’s all down to personal preferences. I don’t think there’s one “best phone” to get right now. No one phone is the best for anything right now, they all have one feature over the other so it’s which one of those is most important for you. So if I wanted the best camera on a phone I’d probably go with the new Pixel for example.
Blazer wrote: » Can't we ban this clown from the apple forum. He's nothing but a complete muppet who just derails the forum.
quarryman wrote: » Are these any use in reducing the risk of cracking the back glass if dropped?
drunkmonkey wrote: » Decent battery in the s7 it's probably just near the end of it's life. I'd be looking for a phone with a 4,000mAh battery. I left iphone due to battery life couldn't cope with the anxiety.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Exactly, nobody open to discussion, one giant eco chamber.
Shn99 wrote: » Why follow this thread so if you seem to have such a dislike for apple?
drunkmonkey wrote: » 2 day, still rookie numbers. Honestly not getting into it here or I'll be lynched.
Nonoperational wrote: » Nobody wants you to...
drunkmonkey wrote: » Not even getting into it in an apple thread but there rookie numbers.
Shn99 wrote: » Mustn’t have tried the new iPhones so, yesterday I had 6h 38m screen time on my iPhone X, put it on charge around 9 with 13% left. Battery optimization in iOS is great IMO, it’s not always about how many mAh a battery has
flexcon wrote: » https://digital.ulsterbank.ie/personal/private-banking/ufirst-private-account.html I have been a customer for a few years and it works out cheaper through Ulster Bank. I am paying €10 a month as I am on a legacy plan but, for €14 a month it includes accidental loss and theft and all the other benefits such as 25% back on ticketmaster and other events overdraft of €1000 and free travel worldwide travel insurance.
deco72 wrote: » Any advice greatly appreciated.
drunkmonkey wrote: » No use at all, it'll stop small scratches which would help resale value. Otterbox or similar is really the only thing that's going to save it but takes drastically from the look. Maybe get insurance, blue are 7.99pm depending on the model.
