tomofson wrote: » Two people from the regency are in prison one awaiting trial the other for a different matter.
tomofson wrote: » I never mentioned they got anyone involved in the regency, they mainly target people who are making money.
tomofson wrote: » They almost got two of them on two separate occasions.
tomofson wrote: » Is a bullet shattering someones jaw not enough evidence for you to believe? Or a bullet narrowly missing and killing an innocent bystanders? The people involved in this are not professional top of the range criminals, particularly not on the Hutch side. One was still hanging around street corners two months after the regency, a lot wont even leave Dublin despite the fact they know they are targets.
tomofson wrote: » Is a bullet shattering someones jaw not enough evidence for you to believe? Or a bullet narrowly missing and killing an innocent bystander? The people involved in this are not professional top of the range criminals, particularly not on the Hutch side. One was still hanging around street corners two months after the regency, a lot wont even leave Dublin despite the fact they know they are targets. Or don't have the finances to leave.
Tricky Dicky Ireland wrote: » That is so ****ing ludicrous, they "almost got" !! I heard that a secretive paramilitary Hutch cell operating behind international borders nfiltrated the UAE in Dubai and "almost got" all the Kinahans..
Criminal informer wrote: » Ya great, you keep pushing the "e-book" and pushing a pro poor kinahan/Byrne narrative which have got innocent people killed, you've let on you know, but know nothing, who gave thoughs names as involved?
Criminal informer wrote: » Because they couldn't get any of the real perpetrators of regancy even though they tried with innocent guy outside noctors and they're doing long sentences now, you said they all were making hutches money, even though hutches are in there.
Og81 wrote: » You know not a single soul of any of them names you mentioned. Its a shame youre so unhappy with life you have to become a fantasist.
tomofson wrote: » What makes you think any of these people were killed for just being distant relations? All of these people were known to be heavily involved in criminality.
Criminal informer wrote: » You're going to have to back that up! So Gary (hutch Neddy(hutch) Barr King-size Kearns Douglas Gareth(hutch) Derek (hutch) Kane Duckegg Buda Yes hiding from mago, ah now I stay away from the patsy, as you affectionaly call it.
tomofson wrote: » Nobody has been killed simply for just being distantly related to someone. Everyone killed was making money for the Hutch faction in some way or another. With the exception of the mistaken identity murders.
Og81 wrote: » Daniels hiding from Gately? Whatever narcotics youre on give me some.
tomofson wrote: » Someone been killed is never a cool thing, where's your sympathy for criminality coming from all of a sudden? I have seen comments of yours calling for the death penalty for much less than what the Hutch family has done. I was simply just stating your assertion that someone was killed for being distantly related to someone was wrong.
Og81 wrote: » You think I care what others opinions are. I DONT. Either should anyone. Reality is that Hutch side are systematically being wiped out and I think its a beauty to behold.
corner of hells wrote: » All's okay so. It's cool to be killed if your making money for the Hutch family.
Og81 wrote: » Ill be sure to light a candle.
corner of hells wrote: » Your joking ,these men aren't even gangsters , they're scourge on society killing people with the most tenuous of reasons , even being distantly related to a criminal is enough to warrant your death. Nevermind the innocent's being murdered.
Criminal informer wrote: » A person doesn't get shot six times for nothing even though they were all the one before Moore was shot, what good is their money now, liam can't come back and cancer is hiding from mago and paying for a "e-book" and goons on Twitter. Yet noone from the regancy hit have been killed.
Og81 wrote: » I dont think anyone does.
mynamejeff wrote: » lol you dont think that these people deserve the disdain of the general public ?
Og81 wrote: » You cant look down on anyone in society remember that.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » 6'2". And even if i was 5'0" i would still look down on scum like the byrnes.
begbysback wrote: » That really depends - what height are u gmail?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Yeah what am i like, looking down on violent criminals who flood the streets with drugs.
