ohnonotgmail wrote: » They just happened to loan him a very expensive car. Perfectly normal i'm sure.
Og81 wrote: » Would your brother not loan you something expensive.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » if my brother owned a car sales company with lots of expensive cars but never seemed to actually sell any i would be a bit suspicious. Especially if my brother was a very well known criminal.
Og81 wrote: » Ok Mr Morality. And how do you know what they sold. Court documents show 1.7 million in sales apparently.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Yeah what am i like, looking down on violent criminals who flood the streets with drugs.
Og81 wrote: » You cant look down on anyone in society remember that.
begbysback wrote: » That really depends - what height are u gmail?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » 6'2". And even if i was 5'0" i would still look down on scum like the byrnes.
mynamejeff wrote: » lol you dont think that these people deserve the disdain of the general public ?
Og81 wrote: » I dont think anyone does.
corner of hells wrote: » Your joking ,these men aren't even gangsters , they're scourge on society killing people with the most tenuous of reasons , even being distantly related to a criminal is enough to warrant your death. Nevermind the innocent's being murdered.
Criminal informer wrote: » A person doesn't get shot six times for nothing even though they were all the one before Moore was shot, what good is their money now, liam can't come back and cancer is hiding from mago and paying for a "e-book" and goons on Twitter. Yet noone from the regancy hit have been killed.
Og81 wrote: » Ill be sure to light a candle.
tomofson wrote: » Nobody has been killed simply for just being distantly related to someone. Everyone killed was making money for the Hutch faction in some way or another. With the exception of the mistaken identity murders.
corner of hells wrote: » All's okay so. It's cool to be killed if your making money for the Hutch family.
tomofson wrote: » Someone been killed is never a cool thing, where's your sympathy for criminality coming from all of a sudden? I have seen comments of yours calling for the death penalty for much less than what the Hutch family has done. I was simply just stating your assertion that someone was killed for being distantly related to someone was wrong.
Og81 wrote: » You think I care what others opinions are. I DONT. Either should anyone. Reality is that Hutch side are systematically being wiped out and I think its a beauty to behold.
Og81 wrote: » Daniels hiding from Gately? Whatever narcotics youre on give me some.
Criminal informer wrote: » You're going to have to back that up! So Gary (hutch Neddy(hutch) Barr King-size Kearns Douglas Gareth(hutch) Derek (hutch) Kane Duckegg Buda Yes hiding from mago, ah now I stay away from the patsy, as you affectionaly call it.
tomofson wrote: » What makes you think any of these people were killed for just being distant relations? All of these people were known to be heavily involved in criminality.
Og81 wrote: » You know not a single soul of any of them names you mentioned. Its a shame youre so unhappy with life you have to become a fantasist.
Criminal informer wrote: » Because they couldn't get any of the real perpetrators of regancy even though they tried with innocent guy outside noctors and they're doing long sentences now, you said they all were making hutches money, even though hutches are in there.
Criminal informer wrote: » Ya great, you keep pushing the "e-book" and pushing a pro poor kinahan/Byrne narrative which have got innocent people killed, you've let on you know, but know nothing, who gave thoughs names as involved?
tomofson wrote: » They almost got two of them on two separate occasions.
