kuro68k wrote: » The British government is going to take it right to the cliff edge and hope that someone else compromises. Of course they have their excuses already lined up if no-one does, only real question is who they will blame.
Anthracite wrote: » Not sure if this is a joke but are you one of the people from across the water who only recently learned that nationalists don't vote for unionist politicians and vice versa? On a side note, she's not even in power - there is no assemly for her to be the first minister of.
cryptocurrency wrote: » Another reason why the UK needs to go hard brexit and flex now or the UK is finished. No seat, no overseas territories, no influence, no credibility....it’s all now on the line.
Bigus wrote: » Please answer my question, how does a UN seat enrich a nation ? Apart from helping arms sales ?
Bigus wrote: » Sounds a little bit like trying to turn back the clock, those strong arm days are long gone .
cryptocurrency wrote: » Power and influence. The fact you can’t see that says a lot. Countries can’t be run by people who don’t see the advantages of these things.
Bigus wrote: » Current list of British overseas territories from Air safety support website , although they forget to mention Northern Ireland Seems well worth fighting for and offending the whole EU Anguilla Bermuda British Antarctic Territory (BAT) - ASSI has no direct responsibility in relation to BAT as the Antarctic Treaty takes precedence. British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Falkland Islands Gibraltar - outside ASSI's remit due to its position within the European Union. Montserrat Pitcairn Island, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Sovereign Base Areas (SBA) - ASSI's responsibility in relation to the SBA is limited to the provision of advice to the Administrator. South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands Turks and Caicos Islands
cryptocurrency wrote: » Going by their locations they are very much worth fighting tooth and nail for
Calina wrote: » tbh if they leave the EU hard brexit they have lost a massive chunk of their power and influence. Your argument supports remain.
cryptocurrency wrote: » Calina wrote: » tbh if they leave the EU hard brexit they have lost a massive chunk of their power and influence. Your argument supports remain. Not at all. Just the opposite. It’s all in the delivery. This needs to be done in a bullish trumpesqe manner. A zero tolerance stand. May seen a swell of support after her statement post Salzburg where the EU leaders publicly humiliated her. UK now needs a very strong leader to replace her but they don’t have that Thatcher figure out there at the moment to stand up, not one I can think of anyway.
cryptocurrency wrote: » Not at all. Just the opposite. It’s all in the delivery. This needs to be done in a bullish trumpesqe manner. A zero tolerance stand. May seen a swell of support after her statement post Salzburg where the EU leaders publicly humiliated her. UK now needs a very strong leader to replace her but they don’t have that Thatcher figure out there at the moment to stand up, not one I can think of anyway.
Michael Booker, who also edits the Sunday Express, said: “I feel slightly responsible, being from the Daily Express.” Speaking at Mindshare’s Huddle event in London today, Booker admitted he voted “remain” in the EU Referendum in 2016, but said the Express’ stance on Brexit was determined by its readers. “You’ve got to play your strengths with your readers,” he said. “400,000 of them signed a petition calling for a referendum. They didn’t think it would come to this particular situation… The politicians are making an absolute hash of it.” Booker (pictured, right) added: “We are in a sticky position. It isn’t the Daily Express’ fault, but we will be covering it every step of the way.”
ancapailldorcha wrote: » In a bizarre turn of events, it looks like the deputy editor of both the Express and its sister paper, the Sunday Express voted remain:
theguzman wrote: » Please demonstrate to me the self-harm caused by Brexit?
cryptocurrency wrote: » In the long term keeping that UN seat is much more important to the UK then falling out with the EU. When you operate at their level then the seat is vital. Germany knows this hence the calls for the EU army and the seat via the backdoor.
cryptocurrency wrote: » Britain have been humiliated on the world stage by the communist EU. The UK is a permanent seat holder of the UN Security Council and is getting humiliated like this. They have only one real course of action to save face here and the credibility as a power on the world stage and that’s to get rid of May, go for a no deal and severe security ties with the EU citing the unfriendly threats they’ve made to them. A few months of military brinkmanship would seen see the EU offer a simple free trade deal.
brickster69 wrote: » You're right there. They need someone like this guy.
Donald Trump wrote: » UK vs rest of EU? Notwithstanding the ludicrous suggestion, given that it isn't even the most militarily strong country in the EU, your hypothetical sabre rattling scenario probably wouldn't work out too well for UK https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing-europe.asp . It would be like the fella threatening to take on a full football team simultaneously when there are few lads on that team who would beat him individually in a one-on-one situation (I know title said not pic or gif dump, but I don't think links are prohibited. Click on it if you want. This is a link to a video that I was reminded of by your post https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3BO6GP9NMY . From the satirical show "The Day Today")
cryptocurrency wrote: » Are you for real? Please inform me of this battle hardened proven force that has a stronger military then the UK in the EU.
cryptocurrency wrote: Are you for real? Please inform me of this battle hardened proven force that has a stronger military then the UK in the EU.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » Similarly, in recent weeks, The Mail appointed a Remainer as editor. It immediately became much more supportive of May.
Donald Trump wrote: » Show me some sources that claim UK is stronger? UK is 5th ranked in terms of standing soldiers. It's not the 1800's any more