ohnonotgmail wrote: » 3 officers had disciplinary investigations taken against them for cancelling points they were not authorised to cancel. 10,000 fcpn cancelled a year using discretionary powers. Gardai cancelling tickets for family members. Gardai cancelling tickets that were well outside their district. I'm not sure what you call that except corruption. The O'Mahony report was a whitewash. the gardai are incapable of investigating themselves.
MrMusician18 wrote: » Quoting the Minister for Justice: "It is only fair to acknowledge that these reports, and their findings and recommendations, are in response to allegations of improper cancellation of fixed charge notices. But any fair assessment must also conclude, on the evidence available, that a great many of the most serious allegations have been found to be utterly without basis, including allegations of avoidable road fatalities linked to speeding drivers being improperly let off fixed charge notices, and allegations of hundreds of PULSE records being destroyed." I'm only going by what on the record.
• Of the terminations conducted outside the Garda adm inistrative policy on terminations, this examination has found that the two predominant areas that were not strictly within procedural guidelines centred on; The creation and retention of audit material. Authorised officers terminating FCN’s for offences detected outside their Garda Districts.
Mrsmum wrote: » Maybe he didn't mention it in the TV programme because it really isn't the substantive issue in his story.
realdanbreen wrote: » Of course it is a substantive issue. Had he confronted his colleagues about their behaviour and they persisted in it then nobody would have had an issue with him. But going behind their backs is what appears to have rankled his colleagues. Do you not think that if a worker in An Post or the teachers union acted likewise that their colleagues would not shun them?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Of course I'm serious. You seem to think that the Sergeant in charge has the right to handle all disciplinary matters and say nothing to his superiors. I served in the military and have worked in management in the private sector since I left. You are clueless as to how matters of discipline should be dealt with . First of all it depends on severity of transgression committed and the discretion of the immediate supervisor as to whether they are allowed to deal with it or inform more senior management. 3 off duty guards driving an unmarked Garda car while drunk is outside the sanctionable remitt of the sergeant in charge.
tayto lover wrote: » What rank of garda could cancel penalty points, anyone know? What reasons had to be given for doing so?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » No reason needed. they had discretion.
realdanbreen wrote: You said earlier that he may have spoken with his colleagues about it and now you are suggesting that he it would be the wrong thing to do!
tayto lover wrote: » What rank though?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » According to the O'Mahony report all ranks had discretion.
tayto lover wrote: » But Mc Cabe said that those who did went behind the backs of the garda who issued them so I thought it had to have been a higher rank.
Raheem Euro wrote: » A coincidence all these accusations cooked up directed and McCabe and then dropped when he didn't fold and stood his ground. The other big one was the loss of the evidential computer in a pedophile investigation into a priest. Guards were all going to testify that the computer had been handed to McCabe and he took it into his possession. Then it was lost - the implication would be deliberately lost. Once again dirtying him with tag that would turn everyone against him - paedo. McCabe could do little more than deny this. He was saved by incredible good luck and carelessness on the part of the people out to destroy him. The original investigation file was acquired by an ally in the station. Original documents proved he had nothing to do with evidence and the computer was never given to him. The stich up was dropped. With no explanation from or action taken against those involved.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » apparently not.
KaneToad wrote: » Watched a bit of it but switched it off. Over the top and mawkish. There was a report produced by the tribunal that contains all the facts. I could do without the ominous mood music and lingering close ups. This, unfortunately, appears to be the way that RTE likes to deal with some factual current affairs topics. Turning an important series of events in Irish life into a sentimental TV show. I think it detracts from the seriousness of the events.
tayto lover wrote: » I think you might be wrong here. It seems a Garda couldn't do that. It had to be a high ranking Garda according to the RTE News but I don't know what rank.
Goldengirl wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Attorney General examining if it's possible to hold Callinan personal liable for some of the costs arising from the McCabe debacle. He won't get jail but it would be nice to see him bankrupt by his actions.
Laois_Man wrote: » Just watched it on RTE player Are we supposed to have any confidence that the policing standards in Bailieborough Garda Station are any higher now than they were in the 00's? I didn't get any such confidence from Part I What's more, are we supposed to have any confidence that the policing standards in any other Irish Garda Station are any higher than in Bailieborough? I didn't get that either from Part I Do you think I'll get it from Part II? I don't expect to!