kuro68k wrote: » The British government is going to take it right to the cliff edge and hope that someone else compromises. Of course they have their excuses already lined up if no-one does, only real question is who they will blame.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » https://www.google.com/amp/www.thejournal.ie/ireland-britain-belgium-2866202-Jul2016/%3famp=1 It's complicated. The US is our biggest market by a country mile and Belgium outstrips the UK. But a lot of goods are shipped on from Belgium. Plus the UK is more profitable because of the nature of the goods imported.
Scoondal wrote: » I gave my opinion. You disagree. You have your own opinion ... why not state your views clearly rather than resorting to stating rubbish.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Would you have a source for that? That's huge news which augurs well if true.
prawnsambo wrote: » I think Belgium has passed out the UK as our biggest EU export market. Just this year afaik.
Scoondal wrote: » A UK MP, Mark Francois, is comparing Theresa May's Brexit to the fall of Singapore in WWII..."one tactical defeat after another". UK voted to leave EU on 23 June 2016. Today is 12 November 2018. They have 4 and a half months before UK leaves EU. And the UK government is still bickering among themselves. Why would any professional Irish business see a future trading with such a country. There is no way to plan ahead or to know what crackpot idea UK will come up with next. Ireland should look to EU for a stable, no barrier trading partner. Even other non EU countries now look like better places in which to do business. Forget about UK. I have already. I am no longer a customer of UK companies or companies with a majority UK ownership. I try not to buy UK products. And I have no wish to travel to UK for any reason. Ireland can exist very well without UK influence.
EdgeCase wrote: » I think you also have to remember in the French situation, the imperial period goes very heavily against their notions of being a very human rights and natural law based modern republic and it was quite contrary to the ideals of the revolution. There’s a sense of conscience about what the French empire was and why it’s not something to have pride in. So, after WWII they were able to distance the modern republic from what had gone before it. It gives them a sense of perspective that I don’t think the UK has. The British Empire, despite its grand scale fizzled out relatively unspectacularly with the country morphing into modernity in the mid 20th century.
Imreoir2 wrote: » No, it can't. The Parliament can vote to leave a treaty at any time if they wish.
trellheim wrote: » One point I see bandied about is that you cannot bind Parliament ( the UK one). However, how does that relate to treaties and the like ? Surely it can bind itself to abide by treaties.
The situation was summed up in a phrase used during Exercise Vireg when it was said, in the face of 70000 refugees living rough in the New Forest that “food was almost impossible to obtain especially after the New Forest ponies had been consumed”.
Spook_ie wrote: » How do they define 50% European, majority of shares are likely held by various pension funds, hedge funds etc. If it's an American Pension Fund with an office in Berlin would that make the shares European held?
Seth Brundle wrote: » I was in a meeting with him years ago when he was Junior Minister for Agriculture and he appeared to be completely clueless as to what the meeting was about. My opinion of him was that he was only elected because he could kick a football!
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: » https://twitter.com/LucidTalk/status/1061946944015228928 Interested to see what they find. The last time BBC and RTE did one of these was most notable for this moment from Jimmy Deenihan.https://youtu.be/TWFZeL-E6zs Extraordinary how so much has changed in the three years since that.
LeinsterDub wrote: » The ownership of Airlines is very important. They must be at least 50% European owned to take advantaged of European deals such as Open Skies
Mc Love wrote: » People still buy tv guides?
Professor Moriarty wrote: » This is the problem. If the deal is acceptable to the EU, it won't be acceptable to the UK government. A vice versa. It's intractable. Hope I'm wrong though.
Water John wrote: » Barnier making it obvious that it is in the UK's lap. Basically deal done, now get it through your political process. I don't believe it will pass, maybe not even the Cabinet, or the Cabinet as it is presently constituted. Itwll take some resignations to get it to Parliament. Those resignations could come from two sides.
Infini wrote: » Wouldn't call it a test for Ireland but rather a test on Britain on how long they want to keep up this self defeating farce. They can either have a 2nd vote to try and get out of this, capitulate or crash in a blaze of incompetent failure. I honestly think under the threat of a no deal and facing disaster the Brits might just have a 2nd rerun of this to attempt to get out of the worst of this. They have no hope of escaping their foolishness otherwise at this point they simply cannot agree as theyre too divided.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Big test for the Irish govt as well as to how far the solidarity actually went...https://twitter.com/DomWalsh13/status/1061983689654132736