vicwatson wrote: » Oh jesus some conspiracy theorists have made it across the void to AH
Hector Savage wrote: » Occams razor really. The likelihood of it being something like meteors, high end military testing etc is far far far far far higher then it being Aliens. Look at the unimaginable distances involved to the closest star systems... why would they be arsed buzzing around our skies showing little hints of their existence ? If they could fly all that distance their tech. is vastly superior to ours and wouldn't be caught out by our ATC.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » If it was high end military testing whose military and why were they in Irish airspace? (I think we can rule out the Irish military unless they have developed some top secret new technology.):rolleyes:
Hector Savage wrote: » Yeah very unlikely, but the whole point is compared to it being Aliens - it's far more likely.
Another pilot said the speed of the UFO was “astronomical, it was like Mach 2”, or twice the speed of sound.
Hector Savage wrote: » but seriously, I wonder could it have been next gen military testing, I mean let's be honest, It wasn't f*cking aliens!!!
maccored wrote: » Occams razor is a likelyhood - ie the solution with the least amount of assumptions MAY prove to be correct. Its not an absolute
AtomicHorror wrote: » Occam's Razor is an absolute- it fully cuts out the negligibly likely in favor of the more probable. That's why it's called a Razor and not Occam's Highlighter Pen.
kneemos wrote: » We don't know the probability of aliens buzzing the skies. Could be perfectly normal.
SimonTemplar wrote: » Life might (and probably does) exist elsewhere in the universe but that doesn't mean we aren't the most technically advanced race.
AtomicHorror wrote: » Sure, but that doesn't change what Occam's Razor is.
kneemos wrote: » Who wants to change it?? Aliens could be the most likely explanation.
AtomicHorror wrote: » I was replying to someone who said Occam's Razor is "not an absolute". It is an absolute, that's the point of it. You don't have to agree with applying it in any given situation, but it is what it is.
kneemos wrote: » It's not an absolute. Ridiculous. The most likely solution is the most likely,nothing more.
kneemos wrote: » The most likely solution is the most likely,nothing more.
corner of hells wrote: » Granard is in Longford , that in itself is the explanation.
wexie wrote: » I think was can safely assume that if it was military it wasn't Irish. That'd be less likely than aliens.
simonw wrote: » corner of hells wrote: » Granard is in Longford , that in itself is the explanation. They turned around when they couldn't find signs of intelligent life
buried wrote: » Very cool. Love hearing about this sort of stuff when its from reliable sources like numerous air pilots. Whatever it was, these people definitely saw somethng they can't explain. Could be anything. Could be the fourth dimension breaking through some sort of time or energy slip. Very cool listening to the recordings
wexie wrote: » not even remotely, I stated in my post that I don't think it's likely it was aliens, just curious as to what makes you sure it wasn't. But I see you don't have much of an answer for me?
Hector Savage wrote: » Have you been reading Cixin Liu?