DChancer wrote: » Guess again with the personal insults. I'm 55 , gainfully employed, own my home, pay my taxes.
Padraig Mor wrote: » To the best of my (very limited!) knowledge of libel law, the burden of proof is on the person who has made the allegedly defamatory statement/s - i.e. in the (admittedly very unlikely) event that O'Hanlon decided to march DChancer up the court steps, DChancer must prove that O'Hanlon lied; O'Hanlon does not need to prove the veracity of his story.
Accumulator wrote: Can't be all bad, is there not a nice pleasent holiday camp around this area, Mosney or something?
Accumulator wrote: Can anyone recommend it for a summer visit next year for a game of frisbee, blowing bubbles, bright candyfloss and inflatable unicorns?
minikin wrote: » Strawman away all you like... where did I mention migration at all? I equated our treatment by xenophobes with the treatment of ‘new Irish citizens’ by our own sad little home-grown xenophobes.
Captain Obvious wrote: » Gardaegularly deal with large crowds of youths and make arrests. The Juvenile Diversion Program and Oberstown Holiday Home are simply not fit for purpose in most cases.
MFPM wrote: » Well thank you for that contribution. In fact Balbriggan has improved dramatically in recent years. There was a huge problem with unsustainable planning but there has been a certain catch up. It's a vibrant multi cultural town that has no more problems than parts of Dublin, Cork, Limerick, Galway, Waterford.
Bambi wrote: » We need many, many German Shepherds Them's the boys to discourage any deviations from normative behaviour.
Blazer wrote: » I highly frakkin doubt it.
DChancer wrote: » I could care less what you think? I'd actually be surprised if you had the ability to form an original logical thought:D:D
Spon Farmer wrote: » It was a very silly comment to make.
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » And many, many condoms. Cuts it off before the issue occurs. If you can't raise 'em, don't have 'em.
Captain Obvious wrote: » iebamm2580 wrote: » As some on here would say prove it or else it couldn't have possibly happened, also most of the people that are giving out about the travelers and African youths here are not actually racist as most of the snowflakes claim us to be, as most can tell Africans tend to be black and travellers white so that claim has no credence, most normal folk just dont like poor behavior regardless of race ethnicity or whatever else. Plenty Irish scumbags in my local town and yes they are known as scumbags, just because these kids re black does mean we cant call them scumbags. Most people here would agree that plenty Irish scumbags now live in Australian and i certainly wouldn't call any Australian racist for calling out poor irish behaviour. Seems like it has to be explained in every bloody thread but racial discrimination has been defined since 1969 as including race, ethnicity and nationality under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination weldoninhio wrote: » Pointless arguing with the loons. If it was a story about a west African being racially abused, with the same unattributed quotes they’d be on squealing about how racist the Irish are etc. Pathetic. I feel bad for you guys. It's so hard to express racists views these days. It's like bigots are the real victims. Padraig Mor wrote: » So, here on this public message board, you're stating as fact that Aengus O'Hanlon, the writer listed for the article, invented this article which is a pack of lies? Unless you've got evidence to back that up, I believe it's fair to categorise your comments as libelous to Mr O'Hanlon? No, libel was replaced by defamation in the 2009 Act.
iebamm2580 wrote: » As some on here would say prove it or else it couldn't have possibly happened, also most of the people that are giving out about the travelers and African youths here are not actually racist as most of the snowflakes claim us to be, as most can tell Africans tend to be black and travellers white so that claim has no credence, most normal folk just dont like poor behavior regardless of race ethnicity or whatever else. Plenty Irish scumbags in my local town and yes they are known as scumbags, just because these kids re black does mean we cant call them scumbags. Most people here would agree that plenty Irish scumbags now live in Australian and i certainly wouldn't call any Australian racist for calling out poor irish behaviour.
weldoninhio wrote: » Pointless arguing with the loons. If it was a story about a west African being racially abused, with the same unattributed quotes they’d be on squealing about how racist the Irish are etc. Pathetic.
Padraig Mor wrote: » So, here on this public message board, you're stating as fact that Aengus O'Hanlon, the writer listed for the article, invented this article which is a pack of lies? Unless you've got evidence to back that up, I believe it's fair to categorise your comments as libelous to Mr O'Hanlon?
Will I Am Not wrote: » I’m living there since the 80s, all my life, and see plenty of it. I’d love to be able to afford to move out of it now but I bought a house at the worst possible time.
iebamm2580 wrote: » All im saying is if it was gang of Irish youths doing this i would call them scumbags just like i will call these youths scumbags. Race doesn't come into it for me its just people calling out bad behavior for what it is. I wouldn't agree with anybody saying all African youths are trouble makers but we should be free to call out loutish behavior regardless of race .
Commanchie wrote: » He highly Frakkin doubts it. Now Im not sure if hes freaking or talking about Fracking.
Padraig Mor wrote: » Other than the name of the offence, was I incorrect?
Spon Farmer wrote: » I think he meant the swear word from Battlestar Galactica. He is obviously a nerd living in his parent's house.
Bambi wrote: » Just train the furry sharks to aim for the groin
Captain Obvious wrote: » By knowing that reference does that make you a nerd living in your mothers house?
Captain Obvious wrote: » That's perfectly reasonable and I don't disagree. It just seems like these things get a lot more attention when they involve particular groups. Although I do have to ask, is there a second video or is it just the one in the op? There doesn't seem to be any violence in it.
DChancer wrote: » It is an alleged quote from an alleged woman at the scene of an alleged incident with not a single shred of evidence to support it.
DChancer wrote: » I'm 55 , gainfully employed, own my home, pay my taxes.
ANDREWMUFC wrote: » Yesterday I seen these 3 black young lads, all dressed in black, and they were using words like “fam” and “bruv”. Absolutely pathetic
Faith+1 wrote: » Dafuq does fam mean?
Omackeral wrote: » Fam is short for family. Dafuq does dafuq mean?
Iamxavier wrote: » It's ironic that you mention a strawman, yet you were the one to bring race into this. Everybody screaming racist, xenophobes etc, are you blind? What has this carry on got to do with race? It's that mentality that allowed huge numbers of CHILDREN be raped on a daily basis in the likes of the Netherlands. Police were afraid to do anything because lunatics would call them racists. The public shouldn't have any say in these matters at all, it's disgusting that the far left lunatics can have that kind of influence, that they can defend a youth throwing a bottle at a pregnant woman because he is not white. That it's ok for these animals to behave in such a manner, because they are not white. Color has nothing to do with it, so stop using it to defend these parasites.
minikin wrote: » Where are you getting this from??? I haven't mentioned migration, called you on that strawman. I haven't mentioned race either.... can you actually read what I typed rather than what you imagine I typed??? Do you know what xenophobia is?
Iamxavier wrote: » You are just being pedantic. Xenophobia has nothing to do with the carry on of the scum in the op. That's a strawman, which is incredibly ironic.
proudboy wrote: » Hopefully its not long before they start stabbing the life out of each other like in London. That's one way of getting rid of a few.