Wishbone Ash wrote: » Probably because they are required to be placed on the most vertical surface of the front and rear of the vehicle. On the vast majority of cars, the windscreen is the most vertical part of the front of a car which is large enough to accommodate an L/N plate.
Sour Lemonz wrote: » Could such a law be enforced by guards against a driving instructor when no learner on board? (L Plates) Just curious how far enforcement of this law could go.
GM228 wrote: » There is none.
PapaOscar wrote: » Taking L plates on and off depending whos driving, utter bolloxology.
GrumpyMe wrote: » When drivers change you normally have to adjust mirrors and seat position. Whats the big deal about removing an L/N plate?
PapaOscar wrote: » ...not exactly easy to get off...
PapaOscar wrote: » ...I know of nobody that takes L plates off when their misses or whoever is finished driving the car...
PapaOscar wrote: » ...When was this law brought in?...
GrumpyMe wrote: » Now that's bolloxology! FFS Well you do now - me! From what was posted in the thread there is no law covering the non display. The law on keeping the windscreen clear of unnecessary clutter can/could be used to end up with the same result.
PapaOscar wrote: » Gimme a break on the grammar im just finishing a 13 hour shift ha. So theres no law that says you have to take L plates off, that makes sense. Its not practical. Im sure if it was that big of a deal it would be deemed unlawful not to do it.
yamaha4life wrote: » it has just alloy wheels, no loud exhausts or window tints, its a small hatchback car i wouldnt like to post much more details online tbh
dr.fuzzenstein wrote: » OP, it's a small hatchback with L plates, a visor strip and alloy wheels. To some Gards this will scream "Fcuk Me!". Not your fault, just unfortunate.
Mint Sauce wrote: » yamaha4life wrote: » so i was on my way home the other day and there was a check point, i drove upto with no worried iv everything cover tax insurance ect, so the garda said are you a learner and i replyed no, to which he said why do you have L plates displayed, i told him i have a learner named on my car and we share it, to which he replyed that i shouldnt have them up while im driving. i never heard that before is that a new thing? the next thing is ive a sun strip on the windscreen approx 6 inches long, he enquired why i have it i told him it keeps the sun out of my eyes and he replyed no its a sticker your not allowed to have any stickers on your windscreen quoted some law and told me that he will sieze the car next time he sees me with it. fair enough there might be some law i dont know but is siezing the car not a bit excessive i couldnt belive it anyway seems they can sieze a car for anything nowadays The L/N plates thing is nothing new. The Sunstrip, there is rules in regard to having certain parts of the windscreen un obscured. If the car is unsafe to drive say due to a Sunstrip taking up to much of the screen, then yes, it could be reason to seize.
yamaha4life wrote: » so i was on my way home the other day and there was a check point, i drove upto with no worried iv everything cover tax insurance ect, so the garda said are you a learner and i replyed no, to which he said why do you have L plates displayed, i told him i have a learner named on my car and we share it, to which he replyed that i shouldnt have them up while im driving. i never heard that before is that a new thing? the next thing is ive a sun strip on the windscreen approx 6 inches long, he enquired why i have it i told him it keeps the sun out of my eyes and he replyed no its a sticker your not allowed to have any stickers on your windscreen quoted some law and told me that he will sieze the car next time he sees me with it. fair enough there might be some law i dont know but is siezing the car not a bit excessive i couldnt belive it anyway seems they can sieze a car for anything nowadays
Del2005 wrote: » Mint Sauce wrote: » The L/N plates thing is nothing new. The Sunstrip, there is rules in regard to having certain parts of the windscreen un obscured. If the car is unsafe to drive say due to a Sunstrip taking up to much of the screen, then yes, it could be reason to seize. Where's the legislation to remove the L or N plate when it's not required? All I know is that you have to display if you are a learner or novice, I know of no law which says that you can't display it when neither are driving.
Mint Sauce wrote: » The L/N plates thing is nothing new. The Sunstrip, there is rules in regard to having certain parts of the windscreen un obscured. If the car is unsafe to drive say due to a Sunstrip taking up to much of the screen, then yes, it could be reason to seize.
colm_mcm wrote: » Saw a newish Fiesta with N and L plates vertically stacked on the front windscreen, top of passenger side, then imagined how much visibility I’d lose on my own car if I had them, not good, and the Fiesta is smaller than my car.
Zatoichi wrote: » I've seen this quite a bit. I've also seen very small N plates about 5''x5'' ...don't know how legal they are.
Spook_ie wrote: » Silly question but who in their right mind at the RSA approved an ad to put N plates on the front windscreen? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEfmPnUlIQ4 The amount of visibility lost by positioning a sticker like that is just criminal IMO I mean you get bits n pieces occasionally about not putting mobile phones, sat navs etc. in your vision zones and then blank out a 20x20 square!
creedp wrote: » Better there than at bottom corner. Where else should it be placed? I can't understand why people put those 4 section disc holders on the bottom passengers side of windscreen, especially in some cars where the bottom of screen curves upwards, it really does badly obscure your visibility.
Isambard wrote: » It's surely not beyond technology to come up with a disc and N/L plate display on top of the dash rather than on the glass.