Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » I’ve already stated I believe Brendan is s victim. His scumbag uncle made him clean up the murder scene. If you have such an open mind then why would Brendan say he was cleaning up a a large pool of dark liquid in the garage? Why would his jeans have bleach all over them? This question is for you not the Rat King group.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » So 2 people you have repeatedly called idiots and "most stupidest" managed to clean up the trailer and garage to such a level that not a single bit of DNA was found? Not even a tiny little drop or smudge?
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » I don’t like groups ganging up on people and bullying them out of threads.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » The group mentality in this thread is so bad that when you direct a question to an individual they all jump in.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » I’ve already stated I believe Brendan is s victim. His scumbag uncle made him clean up the murder scene. If you have such an open mind then why would Brendan say he was cleaning up a a large pool of dark liquid in the garage? Why would his jeans have bleach all over them? This question is for you.
Commanchie wrote: » Ive been directing questioms at you for days you dont even answer them.
dark crystal wrote: » Was there any evidence of Theresa's blood or DNA on the jeans also? I'm just perplexed about the complete lack of DNA evidence in this case. Even cleaning up a large pool of blood with bleach would leave trace evidence. They found deer blood, for instance. If she was shot in the garage, where is all the blood spatter etc.? The bullet casing found had no skull fragments, tissue etc. on it. I'm almost sure Brendan mentioned something about car fluid in relation to the spill....can't be sure! I do agree with you that Brendan's testimony cannot be relied upon - his story doesn't fit with any of the evidence and it's my opinion he is easily coerced - but would this not then also cast doubt on Steven's guilt? Like, besides the DNA evidence in the Rav4, what other DNA evidence connects him personally to the crime in any way? He could well be guilty, however I just don't think there was enough evidence to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » If I try I will get around 10 different replies rather than have a direct debate with you. It’s impossible.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » We live in an age where people expect DNA to be found in every crime scene. It just doesn’t happen like that. I don’t believe the murder went down the way Dassey said it did, I don’t even think he was there. I believe he just helped with the clean up. What do you think of Avery’s alibi? He doesn’t even mention Brendan in his first 3 or 4 interviewshttps://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.inquisitr.com/4619864/making-a-murderer-brendan-dassey-not-part-of-steven-averys-first-alibi/amp/
RocketRaccoon wrote: » I asked you and walshb a question last week, I'm still waiting on an answer to it. I don't expect one though, you've no answer to any questions being asked whereas when you ask a question in here you get an answer. When it's not one you like, you resort to name calling and accusations of bullying.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » He left the thread due to the gang mentality in here.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » A woman is shot in the head after being raped and you don't expect there to be any DNA?
the whole year inn wrote: » i would expect alot of DNA to be present if there was a capture of a girl with chains then raped and shot through the head,Ill do a Philadelphia(Just watched it ) but explain to me llike a 4 year old why there isn't . Not directed directly at you but if anybody can shed some light.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Because she wasnt raped and shot in Averys house.
8-10 wrote: » The garage then?
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » Well that was where the large pool of dark liquid that Brendan cleaned up was, and he ended up with bleach all over his jeans. It’s my belief that Dassey did not witness the murder and just helped with the clean up.
nc6000 wrote: » Why not crush that too to get rid of it?
Mountainsandh wrote: » I can't find any forensic analysis report on the garage anywhere, although they jack hammered the floor. There is no record of that that I can see anywhere, if anyone finds it could they please post it ? All I can see is a report they did a luminol test with a faint glow in 2 spots. I have seen online people saying that there were drops of deer blood found in there, but again nothing official, just people talking online. edit : found them https://archive.org/details/CASOInvestigativeReportRedacted/page/n701 Hopefully there are reports on whether these evidence bits from jackhammering produced any samples of blood. Realistically, if any of these samples DID produce evidence of blood other than deer blood, we would know about it, but I'll check later on tonight. A large puddle of blood would be sure to have seeped into cracks. The chances of reaching down into cracks with bleach and completely covering blood evidence are slim imo.
8-10 wrote: » I keep hearing this as an argument but it doesn't hold weight with me. Sure it could have been crushed, it could also have been driven into a lake or parked somewhere off the property. The fact that there's a crusher on site and it wasn't crushed isn't really relevant to me at all.
nc6000 wrote: » I still have a couple of episodes to watch but what I've seen so far is pretty unbelievable. The whole thing looks to be a complete stitch up and the evidence presented during the trial doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. The way the RAV4 was 'hidden' on the lot doesn't make sense especially when you consider the volume of vehicles which were being crushed back then. Why not crush that too to get rid of it?
Commanchie wrote: » He crushed 5 cars that day why not crush the aRav also.
8-10 wrote: » Yeah I get the sentiment of the question but him not crushing the Rav4 isn't proof of him not knowing where the Rav4 was. It's very weak circumstantial evidence at best that he wasn't anywhere near the car
