bear1 wrote: » Child died 2 years ago this November. It was a still birth which hit us hard... very hard. We made it through but the scars remained and she went ahead with decisions which brought us damn near bankruptcy and forced me to work harder and harder in order to make ends meet. I suggested a few times we try and move back to Ireland in order have a better lifestyle or at the very least earn what we deserve to earn but she was having none of it and this in turn made me feel trapped. It changed my mood which then further changed hers. We fought almost weekly which then became daily. I do feel better since the decision, August was extremely hard and I honestly had no idea where to go or what to do. Tonight I'm meeting her to discuss things and ask her if we can be back on friend terms for now and sort out the finances so the kids don't suffer. I decided last night that I will sell my own car and use the cash to support the kids and to a lesser extent herself. I'll keep the double shifts for as long as I can and also applied for new jobs to increase me salary. I'll commit for now to 1/4 for the kids a bit extra for her in case she meets new expenses. I can't be fairer than that I think.
bear1 wrote: » Some seriously good advice here I have to say and thanks to you all. To be clear I haven't sold my car yet it's an idea. I've agreed this month I'll give 25% but it isn't guaranteed every month and also depends on my own expenses which she agreed to. So I'm a bit more relieved.
IHeartShoes wrote: » Have you seen your wife’s breakdown of costs supporting her request? I’m not sure deciding what proportion of your salary to give is the way to proceed here. Surely you itemise relevant costs for children and their housing etc and then negotiate what portion of those you will contribute to? That could be more or less than the quarter you propose. She shouldn’t require spousal maintenance if she’s working. It’s unlikely she would be awarded that in court in any case.
Kidchameleon wrote: » Could you move back into the family home? You shouldn't have moved out in the first place
bear1 wrote: » The money offered is what i've more or less will be needed to cover food, days out and fuel to bring the oldest to kindergarten.
bear1 wrote: » The money offered is what i've more or less will be needed to cover food, days out and fuel to bring the oldest to kindergarten. What about housing i.e. mortgage, insurances, house maintenance and utilities? Not all of it obviously but a portion to be determined.
strandroad wrote: » So she would have to cover clothes, shoes, kindergarten fees, any healthcare costs, toys, holidays etc herself from an equivalent part of her (much lower) salary? I can see her going the courts route as it doesn't seem to be enough. She is the main carer so it will be expected that her financial contribution is lower than yours to account for that; you might be ordered to sell the house though, I think that Ireland is unusual in how the "family home" is protected from sale; elsewhere it's simply an asset and if it's possible to downsize to release some funds the court will mandate it.
IHeartShoes wrote: » bear1 wrote: » The money offered is what i've more or less will be needed to cover food, days out and fuel to bring the oldest to kindergarten. What about housing i.e. mortgage, insurances, house maintenance and utilities? Not all of it obviously but a portion to be determined. Insurance I've paid for the year so that's already sorted and I'll still pay the monthly life insurance on the house in case something happens to me. Tbh I was the one told to leave so I can't be expected to pay for a house plus the place I'm in now plus support and bills and be expected to live a life by myself. For now it's not feasible and she has the income necessary to cover the mortgage.
bear1 wrote: » IHeartShoes wrote: » Insurance I've paid for the year so that's already sorted and I'll still pay the monthly life insurance on the house in case something happens to me. Tbh I was the one told to leave so I can't be expected to pay for a house plus the place I'm in now plus support and bills and be expected to live a life by myself. For now it's not feasible and she has the income necessary to cover the mortgage. The law isn’t bothered about who asked whom to move out and as you are liable for half the mortgage and obliged to have life assurance, you absolutely can be expected to pay above liabilities and fund your own accommodation. Then factor the child maintenance on top. It is prohibitive and does prevent some couples from separating.. It’s a very tough time with a lot to consider and I do wish you the very best with it all.
IHeartShoes wrote: » Insurance I've paid for the year so that's already sorted and I'll still pay the monthly life insurance on the house in case something happens to me. Tbh I was the one told to leave so I can't be expected to pay for a house plus the place I'm in now plus support and bills and be expected to live a life by myself. For now it's not feasible and she has the income necessary to cover the mortgage.