retro:electro wrote: » Just watching the final episode now and it’s on the phone call between Barb, Scott and Steven. You’d wonder is Brendan better off locked away from these freaks.
Boom_Bap wrote: » I believe that it's all from Brendan's 'confession'. Brendan says that they stabbed her in the trailer and cut her throat, but she wasn't dead. The detectives then led the story to the garage where the spend casing was found. Brendan initially says it happened outside but was then persuaded that it happened inside which puts the final bullet in the garage near the casing.
long_b wrote: » What got me was Barb, when SA suggested her husband might have done it, her denial was just "I was with him all day" Not, "he'd never do anything to hurt anyone". Just "he didn't have the chance" And who buys leg irons????
shamrock55 wrote: » Yea the bullet that never passed through a human body
Boom_Bap wrote: » Not necessarily, it never passed through a head/skull as there was no bone fragment on it. But given that the previous owner of the gun said that he used to shoot at everything including the barn with the gun, it's most likely the bullet came from there or from the Averys doing something similar. I've spent some time in that neck of the woods and they love their guns, particularly for shooting gophers. A girl I know there got her first .22 when was 9 or something and used to shoot gophers with it.
MonkieSocks wrote: » Avery's blood found on the dash of Theresa Hallbach's car. If the blood came directly from Avery's finger as the prosecution have said, It would be a clear clean sample. If the blood was planted (blood from previous blood sample) as the defense has stated, That blood would have been stored in a Vacutainer, Vacutainer tubes may contain additional substances that preserve blood for processing in a medical laboratory. ... The additives may include anticoagulants (EDTA, sodium citrate, heparin) or a gel with density between those of blood cells and blood plasma. If there is EDTA on the sample on the dash, it may be evidence of blood being planted. If not....then Avery may put it there
Mountainsandh wrote: » That's being addressed in season 2.
retro:electro wrote: » The blood stains look suspiciously strange too. Very unnatural looking or something.
Mam of 4 wrote: » When you put it all together , it just doesn't completely add up , for me anyway .
Mountainsandh wrote: » +1 Also, isn't it unlikely that, in a murder through stabbing, gunshot, and other slashing, there should be nearly more blood from the perpetrator 's cut on his hand than the victim's? If he cleaned up the victim's blood so carefully in the trailer and garage, how could he overlook his own blood in the car, and the boot ? If he couldn't be bothered, why didn't he crush the car or dump it elsewhere ? How could he just go up North to the father's cabin knowing the car with his blood was on the scene ? If he is a mastermind of deception for other aspects of the case, how could he be such a blundering fool for this ?
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » Am I right in saying very little of the body was actually found? Only a few bones which they couldn't determine were human or not?
Brock Turnpike wrote: » I can't recall now, but was it established in the first series as to the whereabouts of Scott Tadych and Bobby Dassey at the time of the murder? Had they claimed to have gone hunting together? Or did Tadych say he went hunting by himself while Bobby hunted near where Tadych lived? What I would really like to see is the collated evidence each of the Avery, Dassey, and Tadych family gave in relation to what they knew about the day it happened.
Mountainsandh wrote: » Bryan (other brother) said in an early conversation with Bobby, he told him Steven couldn't have done it because he (Bobby) had seen her leaving in her car. Bryan was never called to testify so this statement was never used in the defense.
Kingp35 wrote: » I think the defence really messed up here. Surely they knew about this so I can't fathom why they didn't call him to testify.
Boom_Bap wrote: » I think that Bryan's account wasn't touched based on the findings on his computer. Getting him to testify by either prosecution or defence could be a disaster. Not really mentioned in the doc, but the defence wouldn't want anything being said against another family member as it would just paint the picture that the whole family are bad eggs....which is the consensus already in Manitwo pre trial
Panrich wrote: » Unless it’s from another source other than the documentary, there is no evidence that there was discovery of incriminating evidence on Bryan.
retro:electro wrote: » Boom_Bap Dassey is another one
Mountainsandh wrote: » Up to no good like the rest of them
Officer999 wrote: » Especially when his poor father forgot his wallet with his photo ID and couldn't see Steven on his birthday.
retro:electro wrote: » Am I the only one who felt he did that on purpose? I got the impression he didn’t want to visit, be it out of sadness or awkwardness or whatever.
