RocketRaccoon wrote: » 10 in each.
enfant terrible wrote: » I look forward to the 20 part prosecution rebuttal.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » I said it to my wife, I wish someone would do something like that.
walshb wrote: » No real need. The trial looked after all that.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » I would love to see the explanation for how he had her diary.
enfant terrible wrote: » Out of interest what Avery's fans explanation for the deceased bones being in Avery's fire pit?
Field east wrote: » I have watched both seasons. In one of the interviews ,by the prosecutor side, of Brendan and he was finlally telling the two interviewers re what apparently happened with regards to Theresa being tied to the bed , raped, and other gory actions. He was then asked a question like something along the lines of where did he get the idea of carrying out those actions and he said that he READ IT IN A BOOKand he actually gave the title of the book. I thought that revelation to be extremely significant BUT that was the first and last time it was aired. None of the court cases ,submissions made ,opinions expressed - especially be Kathleen , etc, referred to it. Did anyonee else notice that or am I missing something.?
Commanchie wrote: » When will you watch it
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Bobby Dassey said he saw Teresas vehicle outside Averys trailer at about 2.40/2.45 but no sign of Teresa. How is this possible if her phone pinged a tower at 2.41? He's as guilty as sin, there's no doubt about it in my mind.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » He won't because he's getting a reaction here. He'd hate to have to backtrack on all the stuff he has spouted so far.
walshb wrote: » Season 1 didn’t see me backtrack.. Is season 2 the real show? Season 1 was very biased. Is this even more biased?
RocketRaccoon wrote: » What are the explanations for human bones being discovered in a quarry near Tadychs house and being discovered by cadaver dogs and never getting a mention in the trial or by the defence?
enfant terrible wrote: » What's that got to do with what I asked? I asked what's the explanation for the deceased bones being in Avery's fire pit?
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Very simple thing to plant. Just like the blood which makes no sense and is just downright impossible to be in certain positions of the car, the dna on the key which again makes no sense, the dna on the hood latch which makes no sense.
enfant terrible wrote: » Just to be clear you think someone planted the deceased bones in Avery's fire pit? Someone planted blood? Someone planted DNA? Someone planted DNA on a hood latch? And Avery is innocent?
Commanchie wrote: » At the time of Halbach’s murder, the mustachioed Tadych was dating Barb Janda, the sister of Steven Avery who lived next door to him (they’re now married). Janda is the mother of Bobby, Blaine, Bryan, and Brendan Dassey. In the series, Tadych delivers a strange statement to the press the day after Avery’s conviction, saying, “What happened yesterday is the best thing in the world,” adding, “He got what he got comin’ to him.” According to Avery’s court filing, Tadych’s “previous experiences with the court system show him to be a violent and impulsive person, particularly towards women.” In 1994, Manitowoc County charged him with criminal trespass and battery, with the complaint alleging that Tadych visited the home of Constance Welnetz at 3 a.m., knocking on her bedroom window. Welnetz was asleep with a man named Martin LeClair, and as she called the police, Tadych is alleged to have walked into her home and told her, “You will die for this, bitch.” Then, LeClair went outside to confront Tadych and Tadych struck him, knocking him briefly unconscious. It didn’t end there. In 2001, Welnetz filed a temporary restraining order against Tadych, alleging he’d call her “repeatedly at work within short periods of time,” threatened to “kick her ass,” followed her, and once pushed his way into her home. Then, in 2002, Tadych was arrested for assaulting Welnetz. After she allegedly tried to kick him out of her home for yelling at her son, Tadych “shoved Welnetz against the wall, took her phone and threw it on the floor so she could not call the police,” and “twice punched Welnetz in the shoulder with a closed fist,” according to Avery’s court filing. Taken from online
Kitty6277 wrote: » Jesus, he seems dodgy enough alright. Cheers for that
Mountainsandh wrote: » Unfortunately, there were no pictures taken of the fire pit when they discovered the bones. There was no grid installed, and the exact layout of the bones when discovered was not recorded. The detective there collected the bones with a shovel and placed them in a box. So a lot of information on how these bones ended up there, whether they were burned on the spot or not, was lost. My explanation of the above question would be that someone brought over the bones from another location. This could be the police, trying to incriminate Avery, or the killer himself, trying to achieve the same.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » The FACT they didn't allow the pathologist near the site just goes to backup that something was seriously out of place.
Uncharted wrote: » Have you actually watched both series??? You seem shocked, these points you're referencing are constantly mentioned in the case. It makes me think you haven't followed this closely....
walshb wrote: » This is unreal... So, watching the show where all this is presented as a big frame job is all we need to know? And accept as fact? No chance that a frame didn’t occur? No chance that there was no evidence planting? This nonsense belongs in the conspiracy forum..
