McGaggs wrote: » Anyone have any recommendations?
okidoki987 wrote: » Anybody hazard a guess as to what 50mg (per 100ml of blood) would be in terms of amount of drink taken, excluding things like weight, eaten beforehand etc? Half a pint, a pint, 2 pints?
dinneenp wrote: » Maybe some people don't but most would. Massive inconvenience & embrassing if colleagues asking 'why are you suddenly cycling in wet, dark weather?v
wakka12 wrote: » Cars broken down cant afford mechanic right now..? I think 3 months is pretty ****, not much of a deterrent at all, 1 year would be more like it
Shenshen wrote: » Will they put an adequate number of gardai on the roads to actually follow up on this? Currently, you're nearly more likely to win the lottery than the be stopped and checked. There's absolutely 0 point in fiddling with the potential penalties as long as people know they won't get caught anyway.
Turner wrote: » The first the Gardai (Gardai out doing checkpoints and in patrol cars) heard of this new law was in the papers yesterday. They have received no training or lectures on its implementation. And dont forget, if they put handcuffs on you after your arrest you are more than likely to get off scott free Joke of a system.https://twitter.com/GRA_NR/status/1055578890788372480?s=19
El Weirdo wrote: » What do they have to know? The limits are the same as before, no? They have nothing to do with handing out bans and fines, which is what this law is about.
Patrick2010 wrote: » Newstalk have on their news headlines this morning that having just a half pint of beer will see drivers off the road if they are stopped now. Where is that coming from???
Turner wrote: » They have to prosecute the case in the district court and most likely appeals court. And if they arrest while not fully knowing the law they can surely expect to find themselves up in the high or even Supreme Courts. They need to know the new legislation if they are to enforece it. They need training on practices and procedures, case law, scenarios prisoner management invluding handcuffing in light of recent cases. But no they get nothing, apart from shane ross holding up a poster with the head of the rsa saying the new law is in.
Canis Lupus wrote: » Would you put your licence in the hands of some breathalyser you got off the interwebs? The only one that matters is the one the garda has and it'll be no defense to say the one you had at home said you were good to drive.
Masala wrote: » If you have to go to the pub ( say for a farewell gig/ quiet read of the paper/ catch a match) you always have a pint of Heineken Zero. No one will know the difference... and you safe driving home Had a few cans recent,y as they on special offer and as a thirst quencher they were alright!!
Andy From Sligo wrote: » hows the price normally of those zero type drinks compared to normal alcohol ? are they much dearer to buy. Its the same with pubs charging extortionate prices for minerals and soft drinks - a lot of them are not making it easy for people not to drink sometimes
Andy From Sligo wrote: » as I always say, we are in am era of fantastic electronic equipment now, and it could be linked to the cars mobilisation system - a tube (or sensor near the screen) if it detects alcohol from the breath then the engine doesnt start - simple as . not foolproof I suppose but it could be a start. - cars could even have gyro sensors inside them that detect erratic unusual driving as well . when you cannot rely on humans on following rules and keeping to them, then I suppose we have to enter the nanny state side of things.
Ginger83 wrote: » Chances of being caught during 3 month ban......slim to none
Andy From Sligo wrote: » here this (UK) advert might make people realise what could be at stake ...
Patrick2010 wrote: » I don't get that. What has a guard to do different today than last week.? Once he arrests someone and charges them then the only difference is in the penalty the driver gets eventually?, or am I missing something?