LiamoSail wrote: » troyzer wrote: » Yeah, when are people going to understand that the president has no power and couldn't do anything you just said? What's the point in voting for anyone so if that's the attitude? People are aware of how limited the power the President has is, however still believe in voting for a candidate who's views align closest with their own. For many, that means a candidate who opposes welfare frauds
troyzer wrote: » Yeah, when are people going to understand that the president has no power and couldn't do anything you just said?
SafeSurfer wrote: » Zubeneschamali wrote: » And Casey (if he moves here permanently) will be right there in it. Do you think he is part of the elite? I think Michael D is much more a scion of the elite than Casey. A professional paid politician for 45 years, with multiple state pensions,on numerous boards, with a daughter a senator.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » And Casey (if he moves here permanently) will be right there in it.
troyzer wrote: » Yes but the implication was that the days were numbered for welfare recipients. They're not. There are lots of reason to vote for a candidate, thinking they'll implement policy is not one of them.
AndrewJRenko wrote: Funny how you forgot to mention how he declined to draw down his multiple state pensions. And what are these numerous boards that he is on?
Dr Brown wrote: » If Casey wins they will probably blame the Russians.
Richmond Ultra wrote: » Casey; number 1. He speaks a lot of stuff most people are afraid to say for fear of being attacked by the PC brigade. MDH is too old. If a teacher asked for another seven years work at the age of the 77, they would be told where to go and the same could be said about any other public sector role. Freeman doesn't fully get the role. A lot of good work with Mental health but she can probably do most of that as a senator. Ni Riada, thinks 47k net is the basic wage. Enough said. Gallagher, second attempt, nothing different. Duffy, not my cup of tea.
irishproduce wrote: » wonder will we get any exit polls?
weldoninhio wrote: » It’s Money D who loves citizen killing dictators, not Casey
circadian wrote: » I just checked into this thread for the first time since his morning and you're repeating the same line over and over. Does it not get boring?
weldoninhio wrote: It’s Money D who loves citizen killing dictators, not Casey
Tell me how wrote: » Love the repeated use of 'Money D'. which I laugh at every time I see it.
fergus1001 wrote: » Crooked Miggledy ? Drain the swamp !
naughtb4 wrote: » troyzer wrote: » Yes but the implication was that the days were numbered for welfare recipients. They're not. There are lots of reason to vote for a candidate, thinking they'll implement policy is not one of them. But it shows policy makers there is a will to tackle welfare amongst some of the country at least. It shows it is a topic people feel strongly about which means it will hopefully be something that is debated at the next election.
pumpkin4life wrote: » Low Energy Miggeldy. He can't go to the debates because he needs to go to bed and get tucked in tight. Poor guy. He gets tired easily. Miggeldy Moocher. Ten grand for his dogs to get groomed. Never ever worked a private sector job. Spent all of your money on flowers and airplanes. Money D Higgins. Sleepy Miggeldy. Tired Miggeldy. Miggeldy Castro.
alan partridge aha wrote: » Ya but who's tucking him in
Donald Trump wrote: » Lads, for anyone wanting to do a protest vote, there will be local council elections next year. Do it there. If you vote in Jimmy the local racist/gobshite/sex-offender then at least the whole country won't be stuck with him making a show of us for 7 years
alan partridge aha wrote: » Makes no sense.
Donald Trump wrote: » I'll try to explain it for you. I'll type it slowly in case you are a slow reader President has feck all political power but is a figurehead. So it is an important position in terms of diplomatic relations and perception of the country. If a politician's concern is local and in local politics, he won't care so much about who is President. If the parties were that interested in that position then they would all run candidates. They don't because they don't care. SF didn't even brand their candidate this time around. So if you want to "use" your vote as a protest to send a message to the "political classes" then it is better to do it at a level that won't embarrass the country but would have an actual impact on the political parties. Start with the council elections next year
alan partridge aha wrote: » But non of the candidates are racist, gobsh*tes or sex offenders as far as I know.
Sycamore Tree wrote: » Peter Casey will make Ireland great again.