AudreyHepburn wrote: » Oh I don’t doubt he’ll win though the margin might not be as big as previously thought. Thing is though a lot of people are jumping on the bandwagon and voting in protest or because they agree with Casey on Travellers and for no other reason. And I just don’t understand what they hope to achieve or why they think he’s some Messiah who’s going to magically change things.
naughtb4 wrote: » I think everyone realises that the president has no power and is a ceremonial role Its one of the main reasons we have never voted out an incumbent president
Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » Probably not, your risk exposure is extremely low so would just enjoy it as entertainment. The best price (current) laying Higgs is 1.06 (subject to commission) i.e. outlay 100 (risk) to (gain) just 6notes. You'd ideally want to wait for or target 1.20+ (set a bit like a stock stop-limit) at least, which would be a much more accurate estimate anyway. Perhaps the best solution on this (single item) would be to look for a early cash-out (even at reduced). You're PTE is €250.50, so wait to be offered, or ask for just 100-125 notes. // Correction: Best Higgs lay price is actually 1.23 (gain 23% if he looses) which is fair and accurate as of today, worth consideration, but again may be subject to commission.
Raging_Ninja wrote: » The job is what you make of it - down have done very little, others like McAleese and her husband played a crucial role in the peace process in Northern Ireland. You last statement is somewhat erroneous - this is only the second time in the history of the state where a sitting president has had to go to the electorate for a second term.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » I, on the other hand, am not an idiot.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » No, but apparently you're from the future.
applehunter wrote: »
JeffKenna wrote: » Where are you getting the lay price odds? I have €5 on.
ELM327 wrote: » Who is that moron?
JeffKenna wrote: » Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » Probably not, your risk exposure is extremely low so would just enjoy it as entertainment. The best price (current) laying Higgs is 1.06 (subject to commission) i.e. outlay 100 (risk) to (gain) just 6notes. You'd ideally want to wait for or target 1.20+ (set a bit like a stock stop-limit) at least, which would be a much more accurate estimate anyway. Perhaps the best solution on this (single item) would be to look for a early cash-out (even at reduced). You're PTE is €250.50, so wait to be offered, or ask for just 100-125 notes. // Correction: Best Higgs lay price is actually 1.23 (gain 23% if he looses) which is fair and accurate as of today, worth consideration, but again may be subject to commission. Where are you getting the lay price odds? I have €5 on.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » He's running for president, it's been in the papers and on TV and everything.
kunst nugget wrote: » He's just someone whose saying what he thinks. It's that only a good thing when Peter Casey does it?
ELM327 wrote: » applehunter wrote: » Who is that moron?
ELM327 wrote: » Two resident sarcastic "lovely dudes" here.
jimjangles wrote: » Hhugedick I don't know any travellers or tinkers as you call them but is your argument that all crime is committed by travellers? Also you think Peter Casey is your saviour? You may want to get a grip on reality. I do agree that anyone that does those crimes you mentioned deserves over 20 years or life in jail though.
naughtb4 wrote: » AudreyHepburn wrote: » Oh I don’t doubt he’ll win though the margin might not be as big as previously thought. Thing is though a lot of people are jumping on the bandwagon and voting in protest or because they agree with Casey on Travellers and for no other reason. And I just don’t understand what they hope to achieve or why they think he’s some Messiah who’s going to magically change things. I think everyone realises that the president has no power and is a ceremonial role
Johnny Dogs wrote: » When does the moratorium black out begin, because I'm beginning to smell a rat ref the complete and utter failure of any polling stats being released post 16th of Oct. Would it be too cynical of me to perhaps suspect that Casey is polling a hell of a lot better than the 2% they had claimed (and keep regurgitating as "news" ever since), the media and the establishment are afraid of their shyte that Casey's votes will get momentum, and so - and with the embargo rapidly approaching, the polling numbers of the 16th is what we'll be left with? If the social media platforms, radio text in programmes, and general consensus amongst people i talk with (during my daily work), are anything to go by....Casey has a serious amount of support out there. Not to mention, the bookies odds..... I smell a rat.
Arghus wrote: » I was that interested in the Presidental Election up until a week or two ago and I'm still not unduly bothered by it really, considering that in real terms The President's function is to basically eat dinners for Ireland. But, I find it interesting all the same, that people are queuing up on here to profess their support for Peter Casey, a man 99% of you couldn't have picked out of a lineup until about a fortnight ago. And on the basis of what? A soundbite about travellers? That's all it takes for a lot of you to suddenly give a sht? Name another thing he said up until that point that was worth even a moment of anyone's attention? No-one cared up until then, but because he hit the buzzword bingo jackpot, suddenly the nuthouse that is After Hours is inundated with Caseyites. Pretty craven stuff if you ask me, you are all very easily swayed. And I'm willing to bet, that despite all the bluster that Casey is going to shock us all,w most of you probably won't be bothered your arses voting. Too much effort, easier to talk crap on the Internet.
omega man wrote: » Condescending drivel. Many posters have explained their rationale for supporting Casey in this thread. You’ve jumped in here feet first with your insinuations.
Arghus wrote: » Enlighten me so.
Arghus wrote: » Enlighten me so. Tell me what wonderful ideas that Casey had that got everyone so behind him.
Arghus wrote: » I was that interested in the Presidental Election up until a week or two ago and I'm still not unduly bothered by it really, considering that in real terms The President's function is to basically eat dinners for Ireland. But, I find it interesting all the same, that people are queuing up on here to profess their support for Peter Casey, a man 99% of you couldn't have picked out of a lineup until about a fortnight ago. And on the basis of what? A soundbite about travellers? That's all it takes for a lot of you to suddenly give a sht? Name another thing he said up until that point that was worth even a moment of anyone's attention? No-one cared up until then, but because he hit the buzzword bingo jackpot, suddenly the nuthouse that is After Hours is inundated with Caseyites. Pretty craven stuff if you ask me, you are all very easily swayed. And I'm willing to bet, that despite all the bluster that Casey is going to shock us all, most of you probably won't be bothered your arses voting. Too much effort, easier to talk crap on the Internet.
Conservative wrote: » He is on Dunphy's podcast sometimes. Living in Sweden is probably his only distinguishable trait. "Independent journalist". His wife must have a good job.
