elperello wrote: » After the events of the last week it's hard to blame you but I don't think they could all conspire to sit on a scoop.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » Jeez, im nearly breathless over my 5shekel wager with PP without Migeldy at 16/1
never_mind wrote: » I would imagine that this has already been discussed in this thread. Travellers are an ethnic minority in this country and internationally recognised as such. When you make a sweeping generalization that is directed at one specific group of people (even if you just group them as a cultural group), it is racist. The Irish got that a lot in London in the 1980s... remember the IRA? Remember in the 20th century Irish bachelors going abroad because they couldn't find work here and were painted as drunken scum? I thought we had more empathy than that as a country - how disappointing. If you want to get into the language aspect, which I think is actually a waste of time, you could say what he said was derogatory, unfair, and narrow minded.
Acidogusto wrote: » So you are going on a rant calling people insecure, do you think there is a possibility there could be some projection going on there If you are going to point out that the majority of CEOs are male as evidence of privilege then why are the majority of homeless people men? There are far more homeless men than there are male CEOs.
never_mind wrote: » I'm not sure what you are getting at about homeless men? Is that even a thing, like? Ireland has one of the highest levels of femal homelessness in the world (see http://bit.do/boards-ie)[/url]. Like it or not (presume you like it, hence being all snow flakey), men still maintain a higher standing in Irish society and it's going to take a lot for that to change so don't fret too much!
elperello wrote: » Somebody said earlier that they could vote multiple times on that Journal survey. Anybody able to confirm that?
cripplefight wrote: » just gonna draw a massive flute on my ballot paper.
Yer Da sells Avon wrote: » Be careful - the returning officer might declare that as a valid vote for Sean Gallagher.
Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » Has Casey started the job already? x22 people have just been arrested (13 charged) today, in a crackdown on alleged burglary gangs, just in the Kilkenny-Carlow area.
trashcan wrote: » In all seriousness , I'm actually thinking of spoiling my vote for the first time ever. None of the candidates appeal to me at all, not even in the sense of, ah they'll do. What an uninspiring bunch.
elperello wrote: » You would be better off staying at home and having a cup of tea. A spoiled vote just goes in with all the other spoiled votes. Nobody will know if you are illiterate, drunk in charge of a ballot paper or a Professor of Politics making a profound statement.
Conservative wrote: » You can. I confirmed it by voting for Michael D 800 times. Casey has it in the bag.
FrancieBrady wrote: » This is wrong. Abstaining from an election is effectively a vote for whoever wins. A spoiled vote decreases the margin of victory and cannot be couted towards the winner's. Not voting is inexcusable in my opinion and negates any comment, good or bad you have to make on the performance of the office holder.
tayto lover wrote: » Some achievement for Casey if he finishes second after being bottom at 1 percent. Wonder if he'll run in the GE as an Independent?