Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » If my car was at risk of catching fire, GDPR would be the last thing on my mind for the manufacturer contacting me for repair/replacement
ELM327 wrote: » Yes but it's the principle and it could be used for spurious or nefarious purposes. We're not all aboard the "free personal info for all" bus you know.
morritty wrote: » Clearly its not a breach of GDPR if a Government department can pass along details to car manufacturers, otherwise they wouldn't go ahead and do it, also they would have been fined at this stage. Multiple times. Listen, If people want there cars to go on fire because GDPR. let them. Most people wouldnt care. But of course you'll have a couple of pricks who feel they have been "violated" and look for an easy pay day, simply because we are living in the year Two Thousand and Snowflake. But anyway it's not my issue really, I for one would be perfectly happy for Shannon to pass my details along to Skoda Ireland if needs be.
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » I'm not on that bus you know. BMW / ford / Skoda or whoever it may be are coming along to Shannon and saying "look, we've a matter of urgency here in regards to peoples cars catching fire, possibly with them in it, we need these vehicles back for inspection free of charge and possibly repair them, any chance we can have a name and address to inform them ?" And with that Shannon comply It's not like Skoda are coming on and saying "hey Shannon, we've a new PCP deal coming up , any chance we can target everyone with a Skoda!"
ELM327 wrote: » Surely that is not GDPR compliant.
morritty wrote: » we are living in the year Two Thousand and Snowflake.
ELM327 wrote: » What's a rant? PS - like most non dublin players taking a free at croker, you've missed the point! Surely the communication should be handled by Shannon then, rather than giving personal information to a private company.
bazz26 wrote: » There are provisions in the Data Protection Act for manufacturers to apply to Government bodies in order to contact owners where a safety recall is required. They cannot apply or retain the data for marketing purposes however.
punisher5112 wrote: » Why would they it has nothing to do with the state. Why would they take on such a thing. Who would pay, who would hire the extra staff etc for such issues. So what if the company looks for ones name and address to send a safety notice. Your information isn't used for anything else after that.
James Bond Junior wrote: » Comment: GDPR is a pain in the hole.
Augeo wrote: » Huge potential benefits for the individual though so suck it up if you think it's a pain in the hole
Cantona's Collars wrote: » Enniscorthy,where I saw a dipstick try to parallel park in a loading bay while lads were trying to unload a truck. And now there's another parked on a roundabout while they run into the credit union. The place must have some of the worst drivers in Ireland.
punisher5112 wrote: » Brings back memories in Sligo with my grandad, They would literally abandon a car anywhere... Tripple parking was totally normal too.
colm_mcm wrote: » Have you been to Limerick?
James Bond Junior wrote: Comment: GDPR is a pain in the hole.
beertons wrote: » Got bagged this morning at 730 on the way to work. Was trying to do the maths, how many cans areir, and the guard doing the windey window charade, I had to open the door as I believe the relay is gone in it. Anyway, I lost count, no more than 5. Got a pass too.