sonic85 wrote: » I dont have the neck for politics. Plus I actually want to work for my wage
sonic85 wrote: » I don't have the neck for politics. Plus I actually want to work for my wage
irishchris wrote: » Typical RTE bias in their interviews and debates. Let the Government/president slide through interviews without asking the hard questions but try to blacken/discredit any form of opposition parties/individuals particularly sf.
gmisk wrote: Why is casey so obsessed with the diaspora?!? F#ck em. Diasprabook.... Zzz... A billion ffs lol. For someone who proclaims to be in tech sector he seems a tad clueless.
gmisk wrote: Casey is all bluster and no substance, don't think he is having a good night, a lot of his points are incoherent and scatter shot.... And a wee job for the wife great. He managed to name some woman from a page wow.
gmisk wrote: I actually think liadh nà Riada has done well when she has spoke here but hasn't been given much chance to speak.
Try_harder wrote: » How much are civil servants paid? Not a whole pile.
_Kaiser_ wrote: » My view so far.. - the two ladies are desperately trying to seem relevant and failing - MDH has problems with being questioned - Gallagher and Duffy are spoofers - Casey is unrehearsed and unpolished... But he's defending himself well against constant attacks (from the other candidates and the host) and not getting dragged into the squabbling, and all the better for it
Try_harder wrote: » Are you contributing to Ireland basically
Try_harder wrote: » Run as an MEP
Berserker wrote: » Oh, I know. It's not even a democratic organisation. The plebs are told what way to vote and they peddle that out as democracy. Plenty of examples out there in the media of what happens when they dare to disagree.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » So she takes home less than Margaret Cash.
Try_harder wrote: » The left hand doesnt know what the right hand is doing Or all their memberships Or their expenses
fritzelly wrote: » Answer me this - what has what tax you pay got to do with being the President?
Ace2007 wrote: » Is it ethical for the government to take up to 47% of your salary as Tax? Is it ethical for them to take 33% on capital gains tax if you sell a property or inheritance tax - which of course you've paid tax on when you bought the property, and the LPT etc. To be that is daylight robbery. So if individuals find loopholes then I have no problem with them using it. Given the amount of money civil servants are paid and consultant firms, there shouldn't be any loopholes out there for people to take advantage of. Everyone would use a loophole to pay less tax, if they knew about it.