end of the road wrote: » this is not true. nobody gets labeled as racist for making that statement. they may get labeled as racist if they tar all travelers with the same brush as the ones they have had bad experiences with.
Plz God an are lady bring them home wear they belong
it’s unblevible Al becouse thear not educated
It’s a joke theses chilren al over the world geting naglected & murders & thay won’t do nothing about it but thay take children from a good home just becouse thay can’t read
Wer is dis
Its traveller/gypsy heritage not to have children schooled at a young age. A foreign government CANNOT kidnap children that are from another nationality
Were and wen did dis happen y did fe take ds poor man and womans children oh god may mind der little girls
Gwen Cooper wrote: » Just quickly back to the topic of children being taken away because they can't read - here's a whole post about it. Oh god, the comments. it’s unblevible Al becouse thear not educated
Gwen Cooper wrote: » Just quickly back to the topic of children being taken away because they can't read - here's a whole post about it. Oh god, the comments.
And ffn joke ppl asking why .... because they nothing but kiddie pinches abs appalling
Gravelly wrote: » It makes my inner grammar Nazi want to launch a blitzkrieg.
Im not interfing but bin tru same ting wid me own child an dey said in da end coz da had notin else da snaks i was bringing her was unhealthy an fizzy pop was rottin her teeth i no u just showing da girls der loved please watch dem dogs dont use dis again u god bless hope da girls home soon xxx
Gravelly wrote: »
I was feeding my child nothing but muck and softdrinks and I couldn't understand or believe that this wasn't a good thing and refused to stop doing so. So in the end in a moved entirely predicated on pure exhaustion and frustration the authorities removed my children because I'm not fit to be a parent.
Nekarsulm wrote: » This woman commenting on one of the video clips actually makes a very valid point... Maryann Ward i don’t know for sure but this is what we heard they the children were in the swimming bath and something so minor happened and the police were called then realised the children couldn’t read or right they even contacted England to see if they have had any schooling back here so in there eyes bcos they can’t read it or right it’s neglect if that’s the case nearly every travelling child in the country should be took off us it’s disgusting to be putting them tru this if they were bad parents it wouldn’t happen there children are there life as you can see ����
vonlars wrote: » Have seen quite a lot of cases through my work where parental ability is being brought into question. The parents involved genuinely, 100% believe that the powers that be are out to get them. I can't even begin to describe some of the justifications that have been given for parents raising their children the way they do and what they think is acceptable. It's infuriating and shocking, especially when it's so obvious to everyone else that for the sake of the child intervention is needed, yet the parents feel they are wrongly being targeted.
stuff.hunter wrote: » ..got eyes cancer reading it, might apply for free laser surgery
wexie wrote: » That is certainly how it should be, but the word racist gets thrown a lot pretty easily these days. And if you've only ever had bad experiences with a particular segment of the population (not even just travelers, could be farmers, or Indians or postmen for all I care) it's easy enough to form the opinion they are all like that. I'm not excusing it but I certainly understand it. And that's why I don't understand why there aren't any positive traveler spokes people out there. That don't try and make right what's wrong by excusing crime, antisocial behaviour, animal welfare issues etc. etc. as part of a time honoured culture. But just are a positive role model on their own accord, and their own behaviours. I would genuinely like to see someone like that. (don't say bleedin John Connors cause i'll never take you seriously again )
wexie wrote: » .....I find this much harder to see, hear and deal with than all the crime to be honest. I can't for the life of me understand how anybody in their right mind could possibly find anything to defend here. People the world over are literally working themselves into early graves to make sure their children will have it better than they do, yet here's an entire segment of our population that are doing their damnedest to make sure their children will be as miserable as they are. Makes me sick. (my OH is a social worker and this is the main reason she won't work in child protection, not they she doesn't want to help, but because it would break her heart.)
Cantona's Collars wrote: » I'm actually surprised that no bleeding heart has suggested that she be given a job with Penney's as a security consultant.
end of the road wrote: » wexie wrote: » That is certainly how it should be, but the word racist gets thrown a lot pretty easily these days. And if you've only ever had bad experiences with a particular segment of the population (not even just travelers, could be farmers, or Indians or postmen for all I care) it's easy enough to form the opinion they are all like that. I'm not excusing it but I certainly understand it. And that's why I don't understand why there aren't any positive traveler spokes people out there. That don't try and make right what's wrong by excusing crime, antisocial behaviour, animal welfare issues etc. etc. as part of a time honoured culture. But just are a positive role model on their own accord, and their own behaviours. I would genuinely like to see someone like that. (don't say bleedin John Connors cause i'll never take you seriously again ) i don't really think that positive traveler spokes people are going to be able to do much to change an engrained culture that sees some people treating all travelers badly on the basis of some travelers behaviour. the only way that can be changed is for a time at least, to come down very hard on anyone proven to be involved in discriminating against travelers, and to make it socially unacceptible to target all for the actions of some. i believe it's very very few who have an issue with someone who has genuinley had bad experiences with travelers saying so. most people don't have an issue with it.
end of the road wrote: » why would they suggest that.
end of the road wrote: » i don't really think that positive traveler spokes people are going to be able to do much to change an engrained culture that sees some people treating all travelers badly on the basis of some travelers behaviour. the only way that can be changed is for a time at least, to come down very hard on anyone proven to be involved in discriminating against travelers, and to make it socially unacceptible to target all for the actions of some. i believe it's very very few who have an issue with someone who has genuinley had bad experiences with travelers saying so. most people don't have an issue with it.
jjmcclure wrote: » Would you live in Rathkeale? Or have a new halting site next to your home, would you FŪCK!!
jjmcclure wrote: » Would you live in Rathkeale? Or have a new halting site next to your home, would you hell!!
Gravelly wrote: » The people who think travellers are hard done by, and who believe they should be supported and helped are like those city-dwellers who enthusiastically support the reintroduction of wolves. They know they won't ever have to come face to face with one in the wild.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I think i'd rather meet a wolf.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/925678a10b2fdb0546d802550390a10f.svg)
