DavidLyons_ wrote: » An awful lot of morons wrongly accusing Peter Casey of being racist and a large number of morons on this site idiotically accusing their fellow posters of being racist for supporting him. Equally there are a number of posters insinuating that anyone voting for Casey is intellectually challenged somehow. I’m giving voting No. 1 for Peter because he has talked about an issue that resonates with me. An issue that certain sections of Irish Society would prefer remain taboo. He has highlighted the criminal, anti-social, “culture” of a sizable, protected portion of our society. One which the hard-working, working classes of Ireland are expected to fund yet not question or object. Casey has opened up the conversation. Most people understand that the role of President is largely ceremonial and without any power but the fact that Casey was polling at less than 2% before he actually stated some facts, only to be accused of being a racist by the out of touch media and several public figures, means that should he now poll well (hopefully over 20% - possible even better) a very strong message will have been sent. None of the others are saying anything worthwhile to persuade me to give them my vote. He has!! I am starting to feel that a number of posters and their fellow cretins in the media are beginning to really worry that Peter Casey is going to do really well on Friday and that just does not chime whit their deluded view of the world they think they live in.
PressRun wrote: » It really is hilarious. What do these people think the president of Ireland actually does?
AudreyHepburn wrote: » If they really want to make a point with their votes they would do well to wait for the next General Election. Otherwise all they’re doing is punishing Michael D for things outside his control.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » Punishing him lololol Will he have to pop down the council and register himself homeless or something?
Johnny Dogs wrote: » He's already a millionaire socialist. He can most likely still enjoy a life of riches, just not via the taxpayers.
DavidLyons_ wrote: » I am starting to feel that a number of posters and their fellow cretins in the media are beginning to really worry that Peter Casey is going to do really well on Friday and that just does not chime whit their deluded view of the world they think they live in.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » We'll still be paying for those dogs long after Michael has departed for the great Aras in the sky.
DavidLyons_ wrote: » An awful lot of morons wrongly accusing Peter Casey of being racist and a large number of morons on this site idiotically accusing their fellow posters of being racist for supporting him. Equally there are a number of posters insinuating that anyone voting for Casey is intellectually challenged somehow. I’m voting No. 1 for Peter because he has talked about an issue that resonates with me. An issue that certain sections of Irish Society would prefer remain taboo. He has highlighted the criminal, anti-social, “culture” of a sizable, protected portion of our society. One which the hard-working, working classes of Ireland are expected to fund yet not question or object. Casey has opened up the conversation. Most people understand that the role of President is largely ceremonial and without any power but the fact that Casey was polling at less than 2% before he actually stated some facts, only to be accused of being a racist by the out of touch media and several public figures, means that should he now poll well (hopefully over 20% - possible even better) a very strong message will have been sent. None of the others are saying anything worthwhile to persuade me to give them my vote. He has!! I am starting to feel that a number of posters and their fellow cretins in the media are beginning to really worry that Peter Casey is going to do really well on Friday and that just does not chime whit their deluded view of the world they think they live in.
wexie wrote: » Actually....has anyone checked whether or not Peter Casey has any dogs or other pets? :eek:
Deleted User wrote: » Anyone that disagrees with this is deluded?
Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » Still no 'official' Ipsos poll published as of today? Maybe they have the 'fear', or are keeping the results under wraps.
NIMAN wrote: » Normally in elections in this country, or referenda, we are nearly hit with a new poll every day. Seems strange this time round.
Tazio wrote: » another Poll here :
The four pillars of the current office-holders campaign are Equal and Together, Strong and Sustainable Communities, Sharing History & Shaping the Future, and Ireland's Voice Matters. His focus in the debates that have taken place so far this campaign has been on his career of activism. The main criticism has been about his spending while President.
Peter Casey has been in trouble over comments on the Traveller community, Michael D's dogs and golf balls. He suspended his campaign briefly last weekend.
tonycascarino wrote: » But how does one really know the national average? I mean these Red C Polls for example are a load of codswallop. They are tools used to influence the public to vote a certain way. In Britain there was no hope of Brexit winning if we were to rely on their polls, there was also no hope of Trump winning according to their polls. Now, I do not think Casey is going to win by any means but I would be willing to bet that he is far more than 2% that the national polls are trying to lead one to think.
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » the US Election correctly forecast Clitnon winning a majority of the popular vote
Pikey wrote: » I don't know. Could be close.
Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » The polls generally ingonred the pop vote question as it's largely irrelevant due to their system. Instead focused on who'd likely be the next POTUS
Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » The polls generally ingonred the pop vote question as it's largely irrelevant due to their system. Instead focused on who'd likely be the next POTUS, Clinton had the lead in this from the getgo, not once did Trump have better chance or odds. In fact he was 10/1 even as the votes were getting counted!
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Pikey wrote: » I don't know. Could be close. Yes indeed, 2% vs 69% is such a tight margin - could really go either way.