nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

So Michael D IS running again!

realdanbreen

So when Michael D was campaigning for president and said it would be a one off term he was lying?
Many voted for him because he was only going for one term and wasn't trying to hog the job for 14 years.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

batgoat

Eric Cartman wrote: »

are you saying traveller children are genetically incapable of learning at the same rate as a normal settled child ? or is it because of practices in the travellers own community that aren't conducive to educating a child ?

Key reasons cited below. Previous generations have very poor levels of literacy, the way to change that is to offer more supports to accommodate for that. There's no way you can change that historical aspect besides such supports. By providing such supports, the trust relationship with the parents increases. When people like you reduce them to criminals from birth, you contribute to that distrust btw.

She said among the barriers to progression are the fact that around 70% of Traveller children live in families where the mother has no formal education, or has primary level education only, almost half have difficulty reading instructions for medications, there is a distrust of the routes society provides for progression to third level, and Traveller history and culture is virtually ignored, not valued or supported in the school curriculum.

Also worth noting the article shows every indication that providing supports works. The benefit is generational. Meanwhile, you likely think it's outrageous to offer such supports. It isn't.

alaimacerc

Eric Cartman wrote: »

are you saying traveller children are genetically incapable of learning at the same rate as a normal settled child ? or is it because of practices in the travellers own community that aren't conducive to educating a child ?

... or just possibly, the aggregate effect of the "settled" community treating them like complete crap?

Itssoeasy

Very dramatic close up on pat and point to the camera all to go to a break.

FrancieBrady

None of them can land anything approaching a knockout punch on Higgins. They are beginning to look like they are all harping on about a triviality tbh

Itssoeasy

If the biggest issue with our politicians was that they changed their minds on standing for office we'd be alot better.

alaimacerc

Sycamore Tree wrote: »

Gallagher always comes across as dishonest to me. He has a lying face. He did not look Casey in the eyes.

I do think he's a spoofer, but let's not get too hung up on him not looking people in the eye -- he has a visual impairment, so odd-looking glances could easily be a function of that.

Eric Cartman

Higgins is rattled, Caseys traveller comments are the biggest applause of the night.

Macdarack

Casey is a tall lad, is Higgins standing on a wheelie bin tonight?

touts

24 minutes in and we're now bogged down the key issue of why they didn't all turn up to the last debate.

This is utterly pointless.

Itssoeasy

Traumatic ? My arse was it. You were caught by a yorker bowled at you sean and instead of defending it like Don Bradman you got caught.

alaimacerc

Itssoeasy wrote: »

Pat addressing the elephant in the room from the last time.

I'm recording this on+1, and I'm already worrying whether I can stand The Plank endlessly -- endlessly! -- "addressing" things. He's altogether too fond of listening to himself, rather than his interlocutors.

For Forks Sake

touts wrote: »

Pat K and Sean G clearly hate each other.

Gallagher will sh1t himself if he sees Kenny going to read out a tweet

Sycamore Tree

Higgins is supreme to be fair.

Eric Cartman

CH3OH wrote: »

I prefer Casey for his honesty, but the others are attacking each other to Higgins benefit

They should all focus on Higgins, he's getting rattled by everything mentioned to him.

Itssoeasy

Yeah sean anything can happen in the last days in a campaign. haha.

Beechwoodspark

Gallagher is very underwhelming.

Hotblack Desiato

Sean's trauma.... :rolleyes:

Hurrache

Itssoeasy wrote: »

There was lads in the phoenix park nearly choking on their biscuits when they heard Michael D say there is one near him.

Dinsink lane is close enough.

touts

Pat K and Sean G clearly hate each other.

CH3OH

I prefer Casey for his honesty, but the others are attacking each other to Higgins benefit

alaimacerc

Matt Barrett wrote: »

So the Irish state was being racist right up until it gave them their very own ethnic status? I disagree.

I don't recall saying that, so you're disagreeing with... yourself?

I think the Irish state was at the least remiss. There's been expert testimony for some time that they are an ethnic group, and a demand from them to get it. Clearly it was very politically unpopular in many quarters, hence it didn't happen.

I recognise they are a community unto themselves within the broader more common Irish one, I do not believe it warrants them having their own status as an ethnic group.

Why's it a matter of "warranting"? You disagree with the accepted academic criteria for determining what is and isn't an ethnic group? Or just reject them as not to your political liking?

You're throwing in colour swatching and anecdotes from Galway. Now you've moved on from colour to the Irish getting treated badly when on foreign shores for being Irish in a foreign land.

Le sigh. I haven't "moved on" at all. I'm still trying to hammer home the same point: that you're trying to cheese-pare definition of what is and isn't "racism". There's not a scientific notion of "race"; it's a sociological construct; thus, so is racism. There's not a qualitative difference between the experience of prejudice of Travellers in Ireland, and that of the Irish "in a foreign land", as you put it.

FYI: Ethnicity is not about colour, nor race in some cases.

For my information? That's a bit rich, as I've been trying explain that to you for several posts now. We're trying to determine why you think that Travellers can't be an ethnic group. Other than you badly don't want them to be. I can only infer it's because that shines a light on your negative attitude to them that you're uncomfortable with.

Explain to me how my stance is prejudice?
Would you give over.

Pick one of those and stick with it!

Itssoeasy

Pat addressing the elephant in the room from the last time.

Rjd2

I will be voting for the ones with the most traveler friends.:D

Eric Cartman

batgoat wrote: »

Due to a lack of supports for educational needs, there's a very high dropout rate. This is a recognised issue, you'll probably claim entirely different reasons for it though even though our educational authorities has recognised it.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/traveller-education-just-13-of-traveller-children-complete-second-level-education-425272.html

are you saying traveller children are genetically incapable of learning at the same rate as a normal settled child ? or is it because of practices in the travellers own community that aren't conducive to educating a child ?

Itssoeasy

Desiree Burch wrote: »

Michael D is so out of touch with reality.

Casey is winning this hands down.

Michael D might not be doing well but not a hope is Casey winning anything at all.

Hurrache

Macdarack wrote: »

Fox behind left shoulder of freeman

I hope Duffy doesn't notice or he'll try murder it.

Eric Cartman

"Like giving chocolate to a diabetic"
- Thats a racist comment.

Casey is holding this down,

Sparko

Total spoofers the lot of them (bar Peter) on the halting site question.

Hotblack Desiato

FIGHT!

SimonTemplar

To be fair, there is no BS from Casey.