marno21 wrote: » Tender issued by Iarnrod Eireann for consultants to undertake a financial/economic appraisal and business case for Phases 2/3 of the Western Rail Corridor:https://irl.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/publicpurchase.asp?PID=136152
Deleted User wrote: » So half a million to placate Canney with a report that is either going to say the exact same thing as all the other reports (it's pointless to extend the line) or will contain some wording that will not allow for the line to be extended but also will not allow for it to be used for anything else What a farce
Grandeeod wrote: » And on and on it goes. The Metrolink plan in Dublin is just the same, despite being at least a decent idea overall its a reinvention of the wheel all over again. Politicians being involved in public transport can be a very destructive and negative entity. That said some politicians can do it right, But not in Ireland. I'm only still subscribed to some threads for a laugh. Athenry - Tuam will reopen as a railway, if we have a change of Government. I can sense it. Its like a Jedi Knight thing. Seriously lads, its on the way. not that I agree with it. I don't. Give it a few years and we will see the WRC getting further than a Metro ion Dublin.
eastwest wrote: » Maybe if Sinn Fein form the next government, when they can use their old pal 'general taxation' to pay for it. That's about the only hope for funding any more of this white elephant, but a SF government would do it all right. After all, the original Derry-Limerick (via sligo, as distinct from the existing route) rail proposal is reputed to have come from the 'refugees' who moved from Derry to Shannon during the troubles and brought their own peculiar brand of politics with them. It seems that a lot of them wished there was a train that would allow them to visit their mammies from time to time, and ultimately that 'train ' of thought gave us the 'western arc' nonsense.
Del.Monte wrote: » Bring it on - right through to Londonderry.
Lord Glentoran wrote: » Ooh, I do love a good ole’ Conspiracy Theory with unattributable ‘it seems’. Can we have a ‘FURY as...’ just for completeness sake?
Muckyboots wrote: » Yip- A bullet train all the way down to Londonkerry.
eastwest wrote: » Ah, ya can't say 'bullet' when yer talking about sf/wot. It would go down a bomb with them all right though.
westtip wrote: » Good coverage of the Tuam and Athenry area council meetings confirming that the application for greenway funding to department of transport will be for the closed railway route. These motions were passed to ensure the anti-tourism cllrs who don't want to see the Quiet Man Greenway on the only route possible didn't try and pull a fast one (again) by trying to ensure the feasibility study request was for a different route. The application is now copper fastened for a greenway on the closed railway route from Athenry to Milltown.https://www.tuamherald.ie/news/roundup/articles/2018/10/12/4163484-council-to-seek-funding-for-quiet-man-greenway-study/
eastwest wrote: » People power always wins out. Councillors had to weigh up their electoral chances against their expenses on the inter-county rail committee and their loyalty to the railway club. The possibility of being thrown off the gravy train always focuses minds.
westtip wrote: » I don't think the county executive were too pleased about how the anti-tourism cllrs had dragged the reputation of Galway coco through the mire last month
serfboard wrote: » The council executive decided to translate the wishes of the council into actionable items - not to engage in fanciful imaginings.
Del.Monte wrote: » I thought that Athenry/Claremorris remains classified as an engineer's siding and I am puzzled by the tarring over of the tracks rather than the fence. Anyway, IE should pursue all those who walked down the tracks for trespass - the fines could go towards the reopening costs.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » That fence is a great use of public funds :rolleyes:
Del.Monte wrote: » and I am puzzled by the tarring over of the tracks rather than the fence.
Del.Monte wrote: » Anyway, IE should pursue all those who walked down the tracks for trespass - the fines could go towards the reopening costs.
whisky_galore wrote: » The fence was put up no doubt after the greenway followers little stunt with a few shovels of gravel and their presumption that it was a public thoroughfare for all and sundry.
whisky_galore wrote: » Del.Monte wrote: » I thought that Athenry/Claremorris remains classified as an engineer's siding and I am puzzled by the tarring over of the tracks rather than the fence. Anyway, IE should pursue all those who walked down the tracks for trespass - the fines could go towards the reopening costs. Council would tar over your foot if it was in the way. No great mystery there. The fence was put up no doubt after the greenway followers little stunt with a few shovels of gravel and their presumption that it was a public thoroughfare for all and sundry.
eastwest wrote: » Very little evidence of anyone in the rail lobby caring much about public funds in this whole debate. The money thrown at Kiltimagh is a disgrace, and nothing to show for it.
westtip wrote: » Three Hundred Thousand Euro thrown at a project by Minister Ring, with No Planning permission (apparently not required according to Mayo coco), very little public support