CrankyHaus wrote: » Yeah that's obviously nonsense. Darndale is a highly deprived area by Irish standards but as a result it receives a good bit of public funding. Anyone in sub-saharan Africa would laugh at the idea that receiving free housing,free healthcare and free education up to and including third level could be considered deprived.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I think you just overreacted to a joke. Quite an old one as well.
joe stodge wrote: » just watched a Dutch documentary about Dublin, the interviewer asked some lad in Dublin to describe how bad darndale is. The lad says “There’s little villages in eithopia that do fund raisers for darndale.”https://www.npo3.nl/danny-in-de.../03-10-2018/VPWON_1284298
Ray Palmer wrote: » Darndale is one of the worst areas in the country. Shows how successful social housing can be. That is why the government should not build social housing estates. All the worst areas are social housing areas created by the government.
Alias G wrote: » Are there no ghettos in the Netherlands that he could have profiled?
ToddyDoody wrote: » Darndale (Irish: Darndmeaning '"daffodil")
Riskymove wrote: » Snowdrop Walk and Buttercup park among the aptly named streets....
wexie wrote: » No the government should build social housing, they should just do it properly and integrate it with other types of housing rather than building it all in the same place. That's how you create ghetto's.
Ray Palmer wrote: » I'll tell you now nobody buying a house wants their neighbour to have got the house for next to nothing and paid for by the state.
Ray Palmer wrote: » So they would need to build private housing too? That is not what people are asking for nor what they point to when the go on about how they built social housing in the past. Darndale is not a large area but huge social issues. Doesn't take many to destroy an area. I know people who grew up there and they don't think the government should build social housing from their own experience. Proper integrated housing require more planning and means longer waits. I'll tell you now nobody buying a house wants their neighbour to have got the house for next to nothing and paid for by the state.
wexie wrote: » Perhaps not but we now know what happens when you put all social housing in one area? And it would seem we can't expect corporations to build social housing, aside from the fact I'm not so sure it's something that should be left to 'the market' or done for profit.
optogirl wrote: » wexie wrote: » Perhaps not but we now know what happens when you put all social housing in one area? And it would seem we can't expect corporations to build social housing, aside from the fact I'm not so sure it's something that should be left to 'the market' or done for profit. Cabra, Crumlin, Drimnagh etc etc. The weird idea that social housing is a terrible thing is bewildering. Has nobody in your family - parents, grandparents etc etc every availed of a social house? Dublin was built on social housing.