King Mob wrote: » No I want you to actually address her claims and answer my questions. Also again, you are showing your hypocrisy as you constantly bleat on about images that you think prove this and that. You can barely string sentences together and it seems that English is your second language. Is that a valid reason to dismiss your claims?
King Mob wrote: » Again, you are a hypocrite. You are dismissing her as a crackpot without actually addressing any of her claims. You are doing exactly what you have falsely and repeatedly claimed we are doing. If she is a crackpot and not a serious person, why can't you debunk her theories? Why do you have to lie about her qualifications and her being part of a conspiracy? Can we just do the same with your experts?
King Mob wrote: » Lol. You giant hypocrite. You are refusing to actually discuss her claims and evidence and you are just bleating on about how you think she's crazy. You are claiming her qualifications are fake and you are claiming that she is part of the conspiracy based on zero evidence. Just your imagination. You know you are using dishonest, lazy tactics here. You'd give us no end of grief if we did the same to your preferred experts. And it's funny you have to resort to these tactics. It's very obviously because you can't explain any of her claims.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » This video exposes her. I can't believe anyone takes her seriously. When she claims nobody saw molten metal right away i knew something seemed off about her. She also claimed no thermite and explosives were not used. This woman either truly believes in her wacky theories or she is a disinformation agent who trying to deflect people away from the real evidence. Listen to her she did even want to discuss her theory. The fun starts at 3.33 minutes in.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Straightforward enough, explain what alternatively caused the building to collapse with normal evidence, sources and information (not infowars, conspiracy sites and random blog stuff please) Since I have a long history with this whole 911 thing, it's highly likely that individuals may attempt to divert or deflect back to attacking the NIST or details - many other threads cover that, this is a thread about alternative theories and looking at the supporting evidence behind those theories
Cheerful Spring wrote: » You state its an insane theory but then refuse to discuss the evidence.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » The experts claimed this happened, you say it didn't, please explain why it didnt, please provide peer reviewed evidence as to why this claim is false (not truther sites or 3 hour long youtube vids from somem random guy) and please explain in your own words why you believe the evidence that you will no doubt provide.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » You state its an insane theory but then refuse to discuss the evidence. I still waiting for your answer as to why you think NIST believes building 7 came down like a crushed soda can? If my theories were wrong least try to debunk them.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Your theory has no evidence and is almost as "whacky" as hers If you are going to dismiss her as a whackjob in this thread, then you'll understand why people will dismiss your empty theory. At least she has a book and some credentials You have an insane theory that unknown people magically and silently blew up a 47 story building in downtown NY with absolutely no one noticing.. except for internet detectives who already believe in a raft of other random and bizarre conspiracy theories And you still haven't put it together yet
Dohnjoe wrote: » He's one person, paid by several hundred thousands dollars by conspiracy theory group to "prove a negative". It's about as shady as you can get. I don't doubt his credentials, but as mentioned Dr Judy Wood has a PhD. Of course if he ever produces the final report, and if it claims the building fell to fire, you will either 1. Claim he's completely wrong/shill/etc 2. Flip and suddenly decide WTC 7 fell due to fire rendering all the posts you've ever made on the subject to be empty Hell, one detail could make you entirely flip tomorrow, it's happened in several threads already
Cheerful Spring wrote: » She also claimed no thermite and explosives were not used.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Dr Hulsey is serious person researching and reviewing WTC7 collapse event.
King Mob wrote: » Those sites are obviously planted there by the conspiracy against Dr Judy Wood: American Hero. You are again dodging and stalling Could it actually be that you can't actually debunk any of her claims? Are you so closed minded that you won't even consider her ideas? Why not? Why do you not believe her?
King Mob wrote: » Has anyone checked his credentials? No? Great, then not a doctor, not an expert and in fact involved in the conspiracy to discredit the serious work of Dr Judy Wood: Actual Expert.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Has anyone actually taken the time to check those credentials? She claims to be a scientist but she writes like a crazy woman. This is not serious science work. From her website II. Once Upon a Time...Once upon a time, there was a building called WTC7, and then it went away. And, it didn't even spill onto adjacent streets. Lol is she serious or trolling?
King Mob wrote: » She lists her credentials on her website I provided. And she's a lot more qualified than a lot of the "experts" you trot out and demand we accept unquestioningly. I doubt you read all of the evidence on her peer reviewed website as she provides quite a lot and you've only had a few minutes. And again, I have provided a link to where she discusses WTC7. You can find it by going back or by looking through the website you've been provided. Again, why are you dismissing her? You don't seem to know anything about her or her claims and qualifications. Yet you seemed quick to pass her off as a shill. Yet you have not provided anything to actually debunk her. You haven't even discussed any of the evidence she provides. That's really closed minded of you.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » You posted a link and that's what I read. I don't care if she is a Doctor. Expert in what ( space beams blowing up the twin towers? You made a claim she said a space beam blew up the WTC7 building. You still have not provided that quote or information.
Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry in forensic science. She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise. ... Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials) Strength of Materials Testing
King Mob wrote: » First, I didn't say that. Dr Judy Wood does. She's an expert and a doctor. She provides all of her evidence there on her peer reviewed website. Please read it. You can find all of those things by clicking through the site. However some of the links are down as the government is trying to censor her. Or you explain why you are dismissing her in such a closed minded way? Why are you asking the same question that you said don't need to be answered when they are posed to you.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Your link The Towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the ground. They turned (mostly) to dust in mid air.” Please just show me something that supports what you said.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
