nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Tommy Robinson jailed

[Deleted User]

Apparently according to Lauren Southern, Tommy has been sentenced to 13 months but there is a UK wide embargo on reporting.

Anyone else got any info?

Edit. Not too sure about the authenticity of the embargo. I'm assuming that it's for this https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html?amp

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Captain Obvious

AllForIt wrote: »

I wonder if this is the court case Tommy Robinson real name Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon was reporting on.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-45193514

The media arn't making much of a deal of this breaking news thus far which is a bit a bit strange. Maybe it's because 5 of the named go by the first name of Mohammad.

The case Robinsons was jeopardising was nearing it's conclusion. Sounds like this one is only beginning. Could be related in some way, like the other case Robinson jeopardised was.

Timberrrrrrrr

PlaneSpeeking wrote: »

And as horrific as that stat is - this is yet another example of a particular demographic targeting underage white girls.

All cases of abuse have to be exposed - if gangs of Galway men were roaming round in organised "rape gangs" then Hell yes it should be front page when the filthy animals were convicted.

Obviously never been in coppers on all Ireland weekend!*

*It's a joke!!!!

Yer Da sells Avon

Tommy's been arrested again.

https://twitter.com/RochdaleHerald/status/1030786479247843330

thebull85

Yer Da sells Avon wrote: »

Tommy's been arrested again.

https://twitter.com/RochdaleHerald/status/1030786479247843330

Links not working for me, whats the story?

ExoPolitic

thebull85 wrote: »

Links not working for me, whats the story?

Some of that fake news...

Abel Ruiz

thebull85 wrote: »

Links not working for me, whats the story?

Its a silly joke.
Rubbish, nothing to see here

TomSweeney

https://youtu.be/UYrYfOHTsYg

When confronted they just don't have any answers or evidence.

FTA69

"How am I far right?"

You were a member of two far right organisations, including one which used to deny the Holocaust. You had a rally in favour of a man whose organisation wants to deport non-whites from Europe and was recently subject to a Channel 4 exposé where they were filmed ranting about "Pakis". The same organisation is openly welcomed at all his demos and events. He also has had brief flirtations with Loyalists in Ireland.

So of course, expressing concern and criticism about Islam isn't in itself far right; leading mobs that engage in violence and blanketly categorising all Muslims as "enemy combatants" probably could be.

Captain Obvious

FTA69 wrote: »

"How am I far right?"

You were a member of two far right organisations, including one which used to deny the Holocaust. You had a rally in favour of a man whose organisation wants to deport non-whites from Europe and was recently subject to a Channel 4 exposé where they were filmed ranting about "Pakis". The same organisation is openly welcomed at all his demos and events. He also has had brief flirtations with Loyalists in Ireland.

So of course, expressing concern and criticism about Islam isn't in itself far right; leading mobs that engage in violence and blanketly categorising all Muslims as "enemy combatants" probably could be.

Yeah but apart from all that?

deco nate

Sky interview Edit...

https://youtu.be/iYA3Wyes6As

And the full interview tbh, that interviewer should have had all the facts in front of him. But no kept saying I don't know this/have any facts in front of me. That's his fecking job!.... Link.

https://youtu.be/JEBdSc8WLY8

Chris_Heilong

Here is a shorter vid outlining it.

This is the perfect example of why you can not trust mainstream media, they are shaping a narrative and not actually reporting the truth. I think even the anti-Robinson posters here can admit that this is wrong.

thebull85

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOgY2QH6Jec

How is there people out there that still use Sky "News" as their news source.

Captain Obvious

thebull85 wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOgY2QH6Jec

How is there people out there that still use Sky "News" as their news source.

Who is your source?

gw80

Thumble weed.
It would stick in the craw of some people to agree with TR.

thebull85

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Who is your source?

Usually BBC, i dont like skys tabloid style breaking news and reporting first asking questions later. They often get storys completley wrong.

BBC are a little slower but are usually more factually accurate.

Captain Obvious

thebull85 wrote: »

Usually BBC, i dont like skys tabloid style breaking news and reporting first asking questions later. They often get storys completley wrong.

BBC are a little slower but are usually more factually accurate.

I think Tommy will have a problem with his lawsuit. Although Sky News did not quote his words, all they really have to do is show that his views and those in the video are the same and it sounds like they are.

thebull85

Captain Obvious wrote: »

I think Tommy will have a problem with his lawsuit. Although Sky News did not quote his words, all they really have to do is show that his views and those in the video are the same and it sounds like they are.

I agree with you on the lawsuit, but its clear Sky News were underhanded here in their editing of that interview, trying to fool people.

Captain Obvious

Looks like Tommy has cost a few cadets their uniforms.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45805285

[Deleted User]

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Looks like Tommy has cost a few cadets their uniforms.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45805285

That is a nothing 'story'.

Chris_Heilong

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Looks like Tommy has cost a few cadets their uniforms.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45805285

For a simple photo they took with him, that is very stupid, this is such a non issue.

Captain Obvious

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

For a simple photo they took with him, that is very stupid, this is such a non issue.

i reckon the stupid thing is to take a picture cheering a politically contentious figure while in uniform.

Cienciano

Captain Obvious wrote: »

i reckon the stupid thing is to take a picture cheering a politically contentious figure while in uniform.

Tommy Robinson supporters aren't known for their intelligence.

El Weirdo

Cienciano wrote: »

Tommy Robinson supporters aren't known for their intelligence.

Nor are squaddies.

skooterblue2

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Looks like Tommy has cost a few cadets their uniforms.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45805285

I read the article. Why does the British Army have a muslim advisor on retainer? A Muslim cannot join either the British Army or the police force. This is forbidden by the Muslim religion.

Timberrrrrrrr

skooterblue2 wrote: »

I read the article. Why does the British Army have a muslim advisor on retainer?A Muslim cannot join either the British Army or the police force. This is forbidden by the Muslim religion.

Erm, you may want to get your facts right before puking out idiotic posts like that.

Brit police force unveils new uniform for female Muslim officers

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/730195/Muslim-police-uniform-west-yorkshire-women-clothing-burka-hijab-modest/amp

For over 100 years Muslims have played an integral role in the British armed forces, including the 430,000 who served in the first world war.

https://afma.org.uk

skooterblue2

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Erm, you may want to get your facts right before puking out idiotic posts like that.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/730195/Muslim-police-uniform-west-yorkshire-women-clothing-burka-hijab-modest/amp

https://afma.org.uk

I think it is better known that a muslim cannot serve in a "Kafir" army or police force. You cannot reconcile the two ideas. There is an immediate conflict of interest between Civil and Sharia law. That is akin to saying that you are an IRA sympathizer in the 1980's in the London Metropolitan Police force. The two ideas are in direct conflict with each other. If you are to do your duty as a muslim and arrived at a scene of a difference between a native Briton and a Muslim, you are obliged to side with the muslim.

ohnonotgmail

skooterblue2 wrote: »

I think it is better known that a muslim cannot serve in a "Kafir" army or police force. You cannot reconcile the two ideas. There is an immediate conflict of interest between Civil and Sharia law. That is akin to saying that you are an IRA sympathizer in the 1980's in the London Metropolitan Police force. The two ideas are in direct conflict with each other. If you are to do your duty as a muslim and arrived at a scene of a difference between a native Briton and a Muslim, you are obliged to side with the muslim.

You claimed that

A Muslim cannot join either the British Army or the police force

clearly this is nonsense as many do. As sharia law has no standing in britain I'm not sure why you think it is relevant.

skooterblue2

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

clearly this is nonsense as many do. As sharia law has no standing in britain I'm not sure why you think it is relevant.

Sharia Law does have a standing as you can get a Sharia divorce (and is legally recognised by the civil power) and there are underground courts running in parallel to civil law.

Danzy

Pathetic that they should lose jobs over it or that it is even a story.

Can't have the working class lads follow a working class lad who doesn't know his place.

Timberrrrrrrr

skooterblue2 wrote: »

Sharia Law does have a standing as you can get a Sharia divorce (and is legally recognised by the civil power) and there are underground courts running in parallel to civil law.

Regardless of what you may believe, your claim that

A Muslim cannot join either the British Army or the police force

Is not only wrong but a blatant lie! Why would anyone believe any other claims you make when you spout nonsense like the above?