bladebrew wrote: » https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/things-are-looking-up-in-cork-as-planning-granted-for-irelands-tallest-tower-873986.html I can't believe that tower got permission! It's needed there, really good location, 1 beds now going up for €1150 a month!
Approved by An Bord Pleanála under the Government’s ‘fast-track’ Strategic Housing Development (SHD), the development proposes 413 apartments, in six blocks ranging from six to 25 storeys, and which, if built shortly, would be the country’s tallest tower.
snotboogie wrote: » According to a post two days ago on the PROC forum (that also predicted the Mahon tower would be approved) there was 1400 objections against the Jacobs Island development. If that’s true I fear the same fate for this as the Glanmire development with appeals, a judicial review and significant delays.
1400 objections to the plaza on Morrison's Island. All dismissed by city council
marno21 wrote: » Is this the post? Seems to be the Morrisons Island plaza rather than the Jacobs Island development I'm surprised there wasn't more fruitcakes out against the Mahon tower tbh
questionmark? wrote: » Fantastic news. It's ideal location for apartments so handy for those working in Mahon to be able to walk to work or a quick spin out to Little Island. Good use of land. Hopefully we see more of this.
lisasimpson wrote: » Loads of people giving out about the extra traffic in the area.sorry but if you lived in that tower and worked in mahon there is no reason for you driving to work. Just pure laziness unless you have a disability.
munstermagic11 wrote: » Right. Other people doing their own thing. Doesn’t make them the sad one.
munstermagic11 wrote: » Given the housing shortage, plenty will live there and need to commute to Little Island/the City/Ringaskiddy. That will increase traffic.
questionmark? wrote: » So what do you want? Don't build houses to help solve the housing crisis as it might increase traffic but then complain that there is nothing been done to solve the housing crises??
[Deleted User] wrote: » Severely limit parking allowed in such developments. Only 1 space for a two/three bed apartment. None for single bed places. It will encourage those employed locally, or those willing to use public transport, to purchase/rent there
marno21 wrote: » There's 400 spaces or so in this development, ~1 per apartment, mainly I believe due to regulations requiring 1 per apartment (which is driving up the costs of these sort of developments).
[Deleted User] wrote: » So no incentive for them to be local employees. Government (both local and national) keep talking about need for reduced traffic and more reliance on public transport yet still allow huge developments on already existing traffic choke points, without such a simple measure of restricting car ownership in such places.
questionmark? wrote: So what do you want? Don't build houses to help solve the housing crisis as it might increase traffic but then complain that there is nothing been done to solve the housing crises??
titan18 wrote: » Maybe build houses and plan out the supporting infrastructure in one go would be handy.
who_me wrote: » Is there any scope for a bridge crossing somewhere from Mahon south-wards across the bay? So traffic to/from this development - and from Mahon Point etc. - could cut across instead of going onto the link, or onto the Well Road and funnelling through Douglas?
draiochtanois wrote: » This post has been deleted.