Beasty wrote: » This is not feedback though. It's a complaint about moderation, and it's only reasonable for the people you are complaining about to come on here and explain their own position and address some of the points being raised by the "complainants"
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Whats with all the sly digs at people for giving feedback? This feels like "yeah we dont give a **** now f off and stop reporting posts" Your attitude is actually quite appaling.
freshpopcorn wrote: » The opening post has a mod warning! It as added at Last edited by freshpopcorn; 24-09-2018 at 19:26. The most beautiful woman in the world thread was created a few months before I became a mod. After Hours is different to other areas of Boards. Somethings are allowed that wouldn't be allowed in other forum and the reason is because it's After Hours. I know some people don't like this answer but some people doesn't want every post dictated/ over moderated either. In the way some of ye accept. People hate it. I have always being the same on Boards.ie since I joined. I moderate fairly end effectively. Dial Hard I reviewed your reported posts from the past year again and there want much to be done with a lot of them for various reasons.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Also BBFAN is correct. Why cant the opening post have a warning in it? The manner of the mod warning that was more about getting sly digs and no opening post mod warning all seems to show to me you dont really want any feedback or reported posts at all and view posters as a nuisance.
BBFAN wrote: » I for one think that the opening post in the thread should be changed. Fresh, you've said "saying fcuking children upsets some people so don't say that". That is sarcasm at it's worst and unprofessional. Surely it should say attacking anyone's children on boards is totally unacceptable behaviour? Also, no mention whatsoever in the opening post about referring to the lady's genitals as unacceptable behaviour. This needs to be dealt with. Just to re-iterate just because people may say these things in your circle in real life does not make them acceptable on a public forum that the lady in question may read at some stage or indeed her children or family may read. If you think that is okay then there is a very serious issue going on.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I gave the example and made people aware it upsets some people. I said no over generalising this was meant to cover people over generalising the woman because she was from the travelling community. If we were to delete every comment that may upset her or her children. They'd be hardly any comments left in the thread.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » I am confused Freshpopcorn. Totally confused about your responses. I specifically referred to discussions about where Margaret Cash was mentioned. I dont know why you put words into my mouth to broaden this discussion into "no mysogyny on boards". Its also very confusing that 2 AH moderators have claimed there was mysogyny aimed at Margaret Cash. I have just given 8 or 9 examples of fairly extreme mysogyny about lying on her back permanently, about her breeeding for Ireland, about how she can be poled, about how she likes it bareback, about how she has a dream job of popping out babies, about how she should be assaulted, numerous derogatory comments about her vagina and how many "pricks" had entered it, and then some comments about how the magdalene laundries were fine really. I'm also confused about why you are turning this into a discussion about you. It isnt about you. Its about moderation. I expect moderators to acknowledge the fairly extreme mysogyny on show and to moderate the discussion accordingly. It seems that there is a concerted effort to deny it. 2 AH modetators now have denied it. The moderation in the discussion only mentioned posts about children. I also expect a bit of common courtesy where the review that took place doesnt get shoved into this discussion as an afterthought to mention only because the issue is being pursued.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Nothing to see here apparently :rolleyes:
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Ah come on now there were posts about lying on her back permanently, about her breeeding for Ireland, about how she can be poled, about how she likes it bareback, about how she has a dream job of popping out babies, about how she should be assaulted, numerous derogatory comments about her vagina and how many "pricks" had entered it, and then some comments about how the magdalene laundries were fine really. It is completely untrue to say there was no mysogyny aimed at her. Frankly this is quite bizarre that a moderator would even try to claim such a thing.
freshpopcorn wrote: » Any abuse against woman is dealt within reason. Sometimes discussion happen that you may not like. I closed a thread the other night that wouldn't have being considered abusive to women. If your referring to the Margaret Cash thread peoples issues is mainly due to people abusing the system and it's nothing to do with her gender. I am of course always open to feed back but other feedback is given not to over moderator and hand out cards/bans/to easy. I am doing my best to keep people all sides happy but I am clearly not going to do this for you. So, I don't know what else I can say to you.
Melendez wrote: » This post has been deleted.
dulpit wrote: » One thing I've noticed is that there is a general tone that's hard to exactly define or report, but it's a nasty place. I avoid. The mods seem (on the basis of this thread at least) to have their backs up against any sort of criticism (constructive or otherwise) which isn't helping either...
Joeytheparrot wrote: » I have to agree. Some years ago there was a large amount of concern about the large amount of mysogyny on AH. It seems that mysogyny is now completely acceptable again on AH. It also seems from this thread that AH moderators dont particularly want any feedback given the dismissiveness and lack of common courtesy in actually saying what they were doing about the comcerns raised until they were pushed on it.
iamwhoiam wrote: » Sorry to disagree but i think it is one of the most poorly modded threads I have seen . Just my opinion .
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Oh right. Yet you've only just said that now after out of hand dismissing my concerns initially. Not sure what thats about. Posters report posts Mods do very little Posters being to feedback Thread gets moved to helpdesk Mods dismiss concerns out of hand Shortly afterwards mods decide on a hush hush review Mods keep this review quiet until other posters keep highlighing similar concerns
freshpopcorn wrote: » I replied to your earlier posts! Since this thread was created we reviewed posts that were reported and decided if they required action or not. Mod Notes were added to thread/etc. That's about all that can be done!
