nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Pregnant Sheep Skinned Alive, hung on barbed wired

thomasm

Pregnant Sheep Skinned, strung up on barbed wire, legs cut off and throat cut. Anyone who can do this needs to be removed from society. As desensitized as we have become in general these days this is just barbaric

https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/news/rural-crime/farmers-shock-as-pregnant-sheep-skinned-alive-in-field-37370886.html

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Assetbacked

Absolutely agree, the kind of person that can do that to an animal is an imminent threat to society and (while people may have different opinions on the punishment) absolutely must be restricted from living unchecked in society. This crime is chilling and the fact the maniac is still out there is terrifying.

wexie

Some real sickos out there, but even if this character is caught with the animal welfare laws in this country they probably won't ever see the inside of a jail cell

mimimcmc

This reminds me of Graham Dwyer, didn't he do something similar?
Psychopaths...

Hector Savage

Christ, this maniac is a threat to people too.

marieholmfan

Was skinned after the throat was cut not skinned alive.

Kuva

Ah he pissed someone off and that's the first payback.

marieholmfan

Kuva wrote: »

Ah he pissed someone off and that's the first payback.

Probably sectarian to be honest.

Donald Trump

MIght as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb

10000maniacs

Barbaric. Needs to be locked up for life. He is a danger to society.

Summer wind

This is an example of true evil. Absolutely disgusting.

Donald Trump

10000maniacs wrote: »

Barbaric. Needs to be locked up for life. He is a danger to society.

What's his name?

Hal? Or Al?

At the end of the day, those lamb chops you love don't end up on the plate by magic. Of course it's far far better to be as pain-free and quick as possible. But the meat on your plate comes from the same place. I don't mean Antrim. I mean animals.

Anyway, if you are upset, just put it down to Arlene Foster on the GFA and Brexit and mark it down as the strike one from dissidents. Or just don't try to understand it and just write it off as Nordies being Nordies. Feckin' weirdos

Kevin Finnerty

Why are there so many links to that paper on Boards.ie?

Your Face

This has to part of a larger story.

wexie

Donald Trump wrote: »

Or just don't try to understand it and just write it off as Nordies being Nordies. Feckin' weirdos

I think some things it's better not to try and understand, being able to actually understand acts like these from all but a clinical point of view wouldn't be a good thing.

wexie

Your Face wrote: »

This has to part of a larger story.

You'd nearly hope so

TheValeyard

Disgusting excuse for a human being.

Xcellor

Is it that different to what is done every day in slaughter houses? Throat cut, skinned and hung up?

We brand whoever did this sick but and find it disgusting but yet the stuff that happens every day behind closed doors is fine.

Cognitive dissonance.

cormie

This isn't much different than systemic practices used to get animal products to consumers. If you're outraged by this, you should be outraged by pretty much all animal agricultural practices. There's no humane way to kill someone who doesn't want to die. Similar behaviour happens all the time, legally, in animal industries.

All the leading world dietetic associations agree that a diet void of animal products is not only sufficient for all stages of life including infancy and pregnancy, but can help avoid some of the common killer diseases that animal proteins and fats play such a huge part in.

If you agree with the basic moral principle that causing harm, where harm isn't necessary, is wrong, and can trust the leading dietetic associations, then consider that any such use of animals can't be considered a need, and if your want (taste, texture, culture, tradition) takes away the need (survival, a life void of interference) of another, then you've already agreed that the use of another life for your want is wrong.

This is a great reality check as to what happens on free range, organic, high welfare, red tractor approved and RSPCA approved farms:

https://www.landofhopeandglory.org/

Your Face

Xcellor wrote: »

Is it that different to what is done every day in slaughter houses? Throat cut, skinned and hung up?

We brand whoever did this sick but and find it disgusting but yet the stuff that happens every day behind closed doors is fine.

Cognitive dissonance.

It's different.

They re stunned before have their throats cut.
It's done by a professional in an efficient manner.

cormie

Your Face wrote: »

It's different.

They re stunned before have their throats cut.
It's done by a professional in an efficient manner.

What about jacking off a bull and fisting a cow to make the cow pregnant, to then steel their baby from them (for veal or for them to meet the same destiny as the mother) to then further molest their teats to take their milk, which was meant for their baby? All perfectly legal. Also if you think stunning and slitting the throat of a panicking cow is an easy and efficient process, you should watch some footage of it.

Even just look at the atrocities committed in the wool industries, again, not dissimilar to the article above:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siTvjWE2aVw

Butcher Boy

Your Face wrote: »

It's different.

They re stunned before have their throats cut.
It's done by a professional in an efficient manner.

Spot on thats what we do.

wexie

cormie wrote: »

What about jacking off a bull

I don't know much about bulls but speaking for myself I've always found that to be quite a pleasant experience...

Graces7

Your Face wrote: »

It's different.

They re stunned before have their throats cut.
It's done by a professional in an efficient manner.

after being crammed, distressed, into trucks, driven terrified into blood littered premises, manhandled brutally. Very humane.

Butcher Boy

Graces7 wrote: »

after being crammed, distressed, into trucks, driven terrified into blood littered premises, manhandled brutally. Very humane.

Here we go again the same **** spun again.

kylith

cormie wrote: »

What about jacking off a bull and fisting a cow to make the cow pregnant, to then steel their baby from them (for veal or for them to meet the same destiny as the mother) to then further molest their teats to take their milk, which was meant for their baby? All perfectly legal. Also if you think stunning and slitting the throat of a panicking cow is an easy and efficient process, you should watch some footage of it.

Even just look at the atrocities committed in the wool industries, again, not dissimilar to the article above:

The bull doesn't care, the cow doesn't know what's going on, and would it be better for us to kill all of them in one fell swoop and burn the useless corpses?

It takes 7 times more water to make nut 'milks' than cow milk. The almond milk industry in the US is worsening the Californian dought massively, with huge impact on the local wildlife. But you go ahead and drink your nut juice with its huge water and carbon footprint while deserts dry further and ancient aquifers vanish, rather than utilise a readily available resource made locally.

Sycamore Tree

Threads rarely come as uplifting as this one

italodisco

Aaaaaaand the pale faced vegans have landed

Flippyfloppy

kylith wrote: »

The bull doesn't care, the cow doesn't know what's going on, and would it be better for us to kill all of them in one fell swoop and burn the useless corpses?

It takes 7 times more water to make nut 'milks' than cow milk. The almond milk industry in the US is worsening the Californian dought massively, with huge impact on the local wildlife. But you go ahead and drink your nut juice with its huge water and carbon footprint while deserts dry further and ancient aquifers vanish, rather than utilise a readily available resource made locally.

Who said anything about nut milk? What is the obsession with milk that everyone has, if you don’t drinking cows milk you don’t have to replace it with a nutty alternative (personally I would go with Oat milk as it doesn’t taste odd and is sustainable) Adults dont actually need milk at all it’s meant for young.

Tilikum17

Xcellor wrote: »

Is it that different to what is done every day in slaughter houses? Throat cut, skinned and hung up?

We brand whoever did this sick but and find it disgusting but yet the stuff that happens every day behind closed doors is fine.

Cognitive dissonance.

Correct.

cormie

kylith wrote: »

The bull doesn't care, the cow doesn't know what's going on, and would it be better for us to kill all of them in one fell swoop and burn the useless corpses?

It takes 7 times more water to make nut 'milks' than cow milk. The almond milk industry in the US is worsening the Californian dought massively, with huge impact on the local wildlife. But you go ahead and drink your nut juice with its huge water and carbon footprint while deserts dry further and ancient aquifers vanish, rather than utilise a readily available resource made locally.

Why do they have to be restrained when these things are happening to them so? Why does the cow cry when the baby is taken, why do they show signs of anxiety and stress when they see those in line before them meet their fate?

So you're having to take the absolute extreme case, the Californian almond, to argue for the use of cows milk? Milk alternatives can be made from countless different crops, locally grown ones like oats too, which use far far less water. Plus, have you ever looked up what uses even more water in California than the almond? Alfalfa, which is fed to livestock.