blanch152 wrote: » That doesn't make it right.
Hurrache wrote: » But they're not given such an allowance are they? It's the president that's given the allowance, it's wasn't introduced personally for Michael D.
blanch152 wrote: » I can tell you this much - if it came out that Leo or Eoghan had a 317k unvouched expenses account that wasn't subject to audit, we would never hear the end of it on here.
Hurrache wrote: » It's not his problem is it? And do you actually believe it'll be somehow any different under subsequent presidents? You somehow seem to think he's responsible for allocating budget allowances to the office of the president.
blanch152 wrote: » When you have a house like his, private security, your meals looked after, and a chauffeur, it is difficult enough to spend you 371k unvouched expenses. Only so many expensive shirts you can buy.
Hurrache wrote: » Yet he still came under budget.
Matt Barrett wrote: » Eating a Chicken snack box from Supermacs paid for by the tax payer I'd bet. The pup
expectationlost wrote: » the presidency isn't about donating to charities
In brief opening statements, the C&AG Seamus McCarthy said expenditure in 2016 was €3.6m, of which €1.15m is spent on gratuities to centenarians.
richiepurgas wrote: » I was sitting behind him on the aircoach down and he was trying to sort out an airbnb room for the night but ran out of credits on his phone. I was happy to lend him mine, he managed to get a room just off McCurtain street.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » One of the burning questions of the day, no doubt about it.
Turnipman wrote: » I'm also curious as to whether he got the train down using his OAP fre travel card, or whether the taxpayers forked out for his State car & driver or, worse still, for the Government jet.
Turnipman wrote: » I wonder whether he paid for his ticket. I'm also curious as to whether he got the train down using his OAP fre travel card, or whether the taxpayers forked out for his State car & driver or, worse still, for the Government jet.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » I see Michael D is at the Liam Miller Tribute match in Pairc Ui Chaoimh and is getting plenty of applause from the crowd there. Good optics for him anyway.
Henryhill2 wrote: » Michael D. doesn't have to do much to prevail Gallagher and Duffy presenting their vain ,opportunistic selves to the nation will do most of the work for him tbh
Sleepy wrote: » Anyone else thing Michael D should refuse to put up posters and instead make a donation of the equivalent cost to one of the Housing charities? I reckon it'd be a vote-winning strategy that would help highlight the attention seeking / platform building behaviour of the no-hopers running against him.
VinLieger wrote: » Very clever move by Gallagher http://www.thejournal.ie/sean-gallagher-rte-presidential-debates-4252593-Sep2018/ As I have said all along he will position himself as the natural successor by staying above the muck and being the answer to the question that those who like Michael D but aren't happy with him going for a second term are asking themselves. Whether that coupled with the sympathy vote will be enough is impossible to answer quite yet.
Sleepy wrote: » Anyone else thing Michael D should refuse to put up posters and instead make a donation of the equivalent cost to one of the Housing charities?