Pete2k wrote: A lot of resurfacing and levelling work going on on the N15 outside sligo and ballybofey. While this is needed especially at Ballybofey the resurfacing near ballyshannon definitely wasn't and I wonder if the amount of money spent on doing the miles and miles of this could not have been spent on other parts like removing some of the bends or widening between Ballybofey and strabane
Alun wrote: » Does anyone here know what the story is with the roadworks on the R755 Kilmacanogue Roundwood toad near Calary is? Work seemed to start OK, then went dead for several months before being resumed again recently. Now, the old section of roadway that had been dug up has been reinstated with fresh tarmac and white lines, and the works appear to have ground to a halt again.
serfboard wrote: » Sorry, I can't answer your question, but I'm using your contribution as an excuse for a rant! IMO, the Tullamore bypass is an unforgivably sh1tty bypass - single lane, with roundabouts every few hundred meters. I wouldn't mind if this was built in the 1980s, but it wasn't - it was completed in 2009, when we (I presumed) had long learned the lessons of underpowered bypasses. What should it have been? A 2+2 Grade-Separated DC, if not all the way to the M6 (which it should have been - the 2017 AADT on the portion to the M6 is 13K), then at least on the actual bypass itself.
roadmaster wrote: » I was heading down to tullamore yesterday and outside clonmellon on the N52 there was major survey work going on the lads where putting pins in every 20 meters with a blue and yellow cables being connected. Any ideas what the survey was for?
wingfo wrote: » Been driving the n25 a lot lately between cork and Waterford.Cork to midelton is good wide road and most of the route to Waterford, obviously Castlematyr and Killagh youghal bridge and a few km beyond would have to be bypassed/ widened. My point is would a 2+2 dual carriageway be possible to be build as there's enough space with hard shoulder/grass verges on either side of the road. No cpo,s needed it would be cost effective and the traffic volume doesn't really need a motorway. Thoughts ???
wingfo wrote: » Carrigtohill to Middleton had a lot of side entrances as well but they worked around that
wingfo wrote: » BelfastVanMan wrote: » Too many side entrances on the existing road, methinks. Carrigtohill to Middleton had a lot of side entrances as well but they worked around that
BelfastVanMan wrote: » Too many side entrances on the existing road, methinks.
marno21 wrote: » The Monaghan bypass is too narrow for 2+2. It's also too short for 2+2 to have much of a use and the roundabout in the middle shows it was always planned as a distributor road rather than a bypass.
spacetweek wrote: » No way is there a point in having the existing bypass a 2+2 when it'll be replaced with another 2+2. Traffic levels are insignificant around there.
BelfastVanMan wrote: » Be nice if it was being 2+2'd..... I guess one can always dream. This will become a distributor road once the 2+2 N2 from Castleblayney to NI border is done, anyway, but I can still see both the short and longer-term benefits of making the existing N2 Monaghan bypass 2+2 DC.
Donegal Storm wrote: » Looks like the whole length of the Monaghan bypass is being resurfaced now as well, they're also digging a trench and laying terram all along the verge on both sides, maybe widening the shoulder..?
marno21 wrote: » N80 Maidenhead gone to tenderhttps://irl.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/publicpurchase_frameset.asp?PID=135290&B=ETENDERS_SIMPLE&PS=1&PP=ctm/Supplier/publictenders
marno21 wrote: » BelfastVanMan wrote: » How much of the road is being upgraded? A couple of KMs max, presumably? 2km or so
BelfastVanMan wrote: » How much of the road is being upgraded? A couple of KMs max, presumably?