pimpmyhat wrote: » Is salah's ownership the main reason you want him? If he was to drop to say 30% would he lose some appeal? I'm asking this as I think mane will be the highest owned Liverpool player sooner rather than later. As you said yourself you'd be loosing a premium attacker trying to fit in salah.
pimpmyhat wrote: » Yes understood but if your rivals are active players there's a good chance they may ditch Salah. Just had a look Salah and mane almost identical ownership. I wildcarded last week didn't even entertain man city mids. Went for guaranteed starters. Re Mendy I have him since the start so may just hold for now. I got vardy and maddison in last week as have good fixtures, success so far. I'd prob be looking at arsenal now for next gameweek as Chelsea Vs Liverpool could cancel each other out.
Deleted User wrote: » km79 wrote: » Why ? I want to have double Chelsea and Pedro seems like he will be either rotated or subbed off a lot so his minutes will be reduced. I've a hunch Giroud could be rotated depending on how high as line the other team play. I dont fancy Kante to be able to produce enough going forward and whie Jorginhino is class again not a big points scorer This leads me to Kovavic who I think won't be as big a rotaion risk (although seems to be subbed frequently enough himself) Small sample but he is begining to line up well statistically for me. In terms of shot and key passes per game Hazard gets a load of touches on the ball per game, with Chelsea playing so much through him it leads to the players around him getting more touches and more space as he often draws more then one player on to him. If you look back Kovaic (position) is also getting more touches on the ball per minute then any other attacking position bar Hazards. (I'm not couting Jorghinio in this) And more touches mean more chances of scoring and assisting. (in a team we expect to score a lot this season) I could be way off here but I feel it is a good position to buy early on a player at a great price
km79 wrote: » Why ?
shineon23 wrote: » There's very little chance they'll drop Salah, purely going by their histories. I had similar thinking on selling up my city MF cover. I was set on selling Silva (ahead of this week) but his goal last weekend and another player dropping in price made me hold on. I feared the worst after he played 90 in Europe but I didn't want to take a -4 going into this gameweek. Auba is my only arsenal cover and my main differential in attack, 10.9 (maybe 10.8) soon seems a lot of money for small returns so far. I like owning him and his returns last season were great. Lacasette could give me the Arsenal cover and 1.5 more ITB, I have a lot of head scratching to do over the week This game is a lot tougher when I'm only half paying attention to what's going on.
heartofwhite wrote: » Can anyone shed light on why so many people have Mendy at the back (me included) instead of Laporte who costs 0.8 less and has started every game? Trying to decide i I should sell Mendy and replace with him free up cash.
Lemlin wrote: » Burnley have good fixtures and Europa League is gone but who are their recognized starting strikers? Is Hart guaranteed his place for much longer?
Iused2likebusts wrote: » Its harts place to leave. Their outfield players is a bit unsetttled. They have switched between 4 4 2 and 4 5 1. They have 4 strikers wood , vokes , vydra and barnes none of them are currently a standout first choice . Some weeks 2 out of those 4 start other weeks just 1. Gudmundson is the best burnley attacking option . Hart a good gk option . I have him myself. Charlie Taylor 4.4 i think has been starting LB ahead of ward might be worth a look too. Apart from that id steer clear for now.
machiavellianme wrote: » Why do you think you need arsenal cover? You can't have a player from every team and you can't always have the exact players you want from those teams you do actually cover. Arsenal look like finishing between 8th and 5th but so do Leicester, Everton and Watford etc. Why not pick up a few stars from those teams and try squeeze in more premiums from the likes of City, Chelsea and Liverpool who will be fighting at the top and scoring more /conceding less than Arsenal?
Green&Red wrote: » Looks like I’ve to get shot of Rico, came off at HT yesterday. Anyone any insight into whether Peltier is now a sure thing?
bantee wrote: » Was Peltier not stretchered off yesterday? Or maybe I’m thinking of someone else
Shanotheslayer wrote: » What are people doing with the double Chelsea / double or triple Liverpool conundrum next week?
Iused2likebusts wrote: » Its harts place to lose. Their outfield players is a bit unsetttled. They have switched between 4 4 2 and 4 5 1. They have 4 strikers wood , vokes , vydra and barnes none of them are currently a standout first choice . Some weeks 2 out of those 4 start other weeks just 1. Gudmundson is the best burnley attacking option . Hart a good gk option . I have him myself. Charlie Taylor 4.4 i think has been starting LB ahead of ward might be worth a look too. Apart from that id steer clear for now.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » Just to add to this aaron lennon scored his first goal yesterday for 2 and a half years. I remember going in very strong for people to stay away from him as his finishing is awful after he scored a goal the week before an everton dgw 2 and a half years ago.
eh i dunno wrote: » Debating Mendy and mane out. Robertson and hazard in. Opinions?
