GW7 Transfers

bantee · 22-09-2018 5:46pm #1

More than likely be Shurrle to Richi for me

Hogey007 · 22-09-2018 5:48pm

Pedro to Madison most likely

KevIRL · 22-09-2018 5:50pm

Wildcard activated

Shanotheslayer · 22-09-2018 5:50pm

Really tempted to do Mane to Milner on the basis Liverpool get a penalty in there next game

km79 · 22-09-2018 5:57pm

2 FT
Pedro Townsend schemeichel mayhe Mendy on the chopping block

km79 · 22-09-2018 5:58pm

Shanotheslayer wrote: »

Really tempted to do Mane to Milner on the basis Liverpool get a penalty in there next game

Am I missing something ?

22-09-2018 6:00pm

Could be the week i get kovaic in maybe for pedro kinda depends on tomorrow's game

km79 · 22-09-2018 6:01pm

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Could be the week i get kovaic in maybe for pedro kinda depends on tomorrow's game

Why ?

extra gravy · 22-09-2018 6:03pm

Will wait on Mendy news but Zaha to Mitrovic is likely. Fulham weren't great today but he still had good chances. Zaha has been disappointing since I got him and there always seems to be some sort of niggly injury.

Shanotheslayer · 22-09-2018 6:08pm

km79 wrote: »

Am I missing something ?

Really just think Liverpool get a Penalty! I most likely won't do it.

km79 · 22-09-2018 6:23pm

Shanotheslayer wrote: »

Really just think Liverpool get a Penalty! I most likely won't do it.

What about the rest of the week they don’t and he doesn’t start?
What if Mané wins pen ?
Crazy move

22-09-2018 6:35pm

km79 wrote: »

Why ?

I want to have double Chelsea and Pedro seems like he will be either rotated or subbed off a lot so his minutes will be reduced.
I've a hunch Giroud could be rotated depending on how high as line the other team play.
I dont fancy Kante to be able to produce enough going forward and whie Jorginhino is class again not a big points scorer

This leads me to Kovavic who I think won't be as big a rotaion risk (although seems to be subbed frequently enough himself)
Small sample but he is begining to line up well statistically for me. In terms of shot and key passes per game

Hazard gets a load of touches on the ball per game, with Chelsea playing so much through him it leads to the players around him getting more touches and more space as he often draws more then one player on to him.

If you look back Kovaic (position) is also getting more touches on the ball per minute then any other attacking position bar Hazards. (I'm not couting Jorghinio in this)

And more touches mean more chances of scoring and assisting. (in a team we expect to score a lot this season)

I could be way off here but I feel it is a good position to buy early on a player at a great price

km79 · 22-09-2018 6:54pm

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I want to have double Chelsea and Pedro seems like he will be either rotated or subbed off a lot so his minutes will be reduced.
I've a hunch Giroud could be rotated depending on how high as line the other team play.
I dont fancy Kante to be able to produce enough going forward and whie Jorginhino is class again not a big points scorer

This leads me to Kovavic who I think won't be as big a rotaion risk (although seems to be subbed frequently enough himself)
Small sample but he is begining to line up well statistically for me. In terms of shot and key passes per game

Hazard gets a load of touches on the ball per game, with Chelsea playing so much through him it leads to the players around him getting more touches and more space as he often draws more then one player on to him.

If you look back Kovaic (position) is also getting more touches on the ball per minute then any other attacking position bar Hazards. (I'm not couting Jorghinio in this)

And more touches mean more chances of scoring and assisting. (in a team we expect to score a lot this season)

I could be way off here but I feel it is a good position to buy early on a player at a great price

I watched him last week and was also impressed BUT I think he will play similar minutes to Pedro give or take , has lessgial threat and they have a mixed bag of fixtures
In short it’s a waste of a transfer imo
Sell Pedro by all means but not for him

macraignil · 22-09-2018 6:56pm

Trippier in for Pereira who was not on Leicester team today for some reason I'm not sure of. Pereira seems to have good attacking points potential but Leicester look like they will concede loads this season.
Trippier looks to be on free kick duty so will look to playing him every week, and he's a good way towards a price rise. Was going to go Eriksen in for Neves but I think he can just sit on the bench a bit longer now as to me it looks like Trippier could get more points in than Eriksen.

breffni bogballer · 22-09-2018 6:57pm

No Lloris or Vorm for Spurs,Gazza at 4.5m and 3 g8 fixtures

patmac · 22-09-2018 7:40pm

breffni bogballer wrote: »

No Lloris or Vorm for Spurs,Gazza at 4.5m and 3 g8 fixtures

Fcuk just did rage Foster to Hart ah well, playing terrible this year, too embarrassed to post last weeks -4 which involved Mendy and Hudson Odi to Frazer and

Bamba I’d have been better off with Bambi, I was very drunk at the time in my defence.

Lemlin · 22-09-2018 7:40pm

breffni bogballer wrote: »

No Lloris or Vorm for Spurs,Gazza at 4.5m and 3 g8 fixtures

Good for a wildcard but otherwise you are looking at 2 transfers - 1 to get him in and another to get him back out a few weeks later.

machiavellianme · 22-09-2018 7:40pm

breffni bogballer wrote: »

No Lloris or Vorm for Spurs,Gazza at 4.5m and 3 g8 fixtures

Three fixtures in GW8? First I heard of a TGW

Lemlin · 22-09-2018 7:41pm

machiavellianme wrote: »

Three fixtures in GW8? First I heard of a TGW

Text speak - he means great.

machiavellianme · 22-09-2018 7:56pm

Lemlin wrote: »

Text speak - he means great.

Bloody nonsense. You'd thing there'd have to be an "r" in there somewhere?
On a FF forum, my first thought when I see a work beginning with G is always either "goal" or "gameweek", or maybe at a stretch, Jordan Henderson's gait.

Anyway, considering Spurs kept just 1 clean sheet all season, I wouldnt be rushing to get Gazzinaga in, especially with superior 4.5m options for keepers playing week in, week out who have actually kept a few cleanies and made a few saves... even if they are named Joe Hart or Alex McCarthy or Rui Patricio.

Mr. Guappa · 22-09-2018 8:01pm

Have 2FT, Pedro out looks likely with the first, with Fraser or Richarlison on the watch list. Not too sure on the second, Wilson -> Mitrovic a possibility, Mendy could be on the chopping block too depending on what news emerges there. Could also roll the second.

extra gravy · 22-09-2018 8:07pm

machiavellianme wrote: »

Bloody nonsense.

normanoffside · 22-09-2018 8:08pm

machiavellianme wrote: »

Bloody nonsense. You'd thing there'd have to be an "r" in there somewhere?
On a FF forum, my first thought when I see a work beginning with G is always either "goal" or "gameweek", or maybe at a stretch, Jordan Henderson's gait.

Maybe he has a lisp?

Neil3030 · 22-09-2018 8:33pm

Considering a bank, but will give Mendy as long as he needs, as City are home against BHA.

Klonker · 22-09-2018 9:27pm

Would it be crazy to use bench boost with a non playing keeper? Other 13 have good fixtures and would use FT to get someone decent for Kamara.

I think I'm just trying to avoid making a decision who to bench

Shanotheslayer · 22-09-2018 10:15pm

Klonker wrote: »

Would it be crazy to use bench boost with a non playing keeper? Other 13 have good fixtures and would use FT to get someone decent for Kamara.

I think I'm just trying to avoid making a decision who to bench

Why not take a - 4? Essentially a - 2 to get a playing keeper

Klonker · 22-09-2018 10:19pm

Shanotheslayer wrote: »

Klonker wrote: »

Would it be crazy to use bench boost with a non playing keeper? Other 13 have good fixtures and would use FT to get someone decent for Kamara.

I think I'm just trying to avoid making a decision who to bench

Why not take a - 4? Essentially a - 2 to get a playing keeper

I could do but Ederson is my other keeper so I think it might be a waste of .5m to upgrade, worth thinking about though!

Chesty08 · 22-09-2018 10:26pm

Salah out for Kane

Then Either Ings or Wilson out for a player 6.8m (Maddison) /7.4m (Moura / Ramsey)

So it’s either
Maddison & Wilson
Or
Moura or Ramsey & Ings

Thepoet85 · 22-09-2018 11:37pm

KevIRL wrote:

Wildcard activated

Mine is, for real !

shineon23 · 23-09-2018 12:29am

Using this as a note to self for later in the week
Leaning towards banking and having a mini wilddcard soon as I have a few on the chopping block over the next few GWs to get Salah back in.

Looking at moving on the following in no particular order.
David Silva
Mendy
Walcott
Kante
Auba

For -4, I can do
Silva-Auba to Salah-Mitrovic. I don't love this move as I'm losing a premium attacker

Don't like tying up so much in a non plying Mendy.

Happy enough holding Kante (5th MF) and Walcott medium term as least they're playing and downgrading them doesn't really help me with Salah funds.

If I make a move it will either be the -4 above

or downgrade Mendy to a certain starter and start building Salah funds, who may or may not be a certain diminutive Portuguese right back :P

pimpmyhat · 23-09-2018 12:36am

shineon23 wrote: »

Using this as a note to self for later in the week
Leaning towards banking and having a mini wilddcard soon as I have a few on the chopping block over the next few GWs to get Salah back in.

Looking at moving on the following in no particular order.
David Silva
Mendy
Walcott
Kante
Auba

For -4, I can do
Silva-Auba to Salah-Mitrovic. I don't love this move as I'm losing a premium attacker

Don't like tying up so much in a non plying Mendy.

Happy enough holding Kante (5th MF) and Walcott medium term as least they're playing and downgrading them doesn't really help me with Salah funds.

If I make a move it will either be the -4 above

or downgrade Mendy to a certain starter and start building Salah funds, who may or may not be a certain diminutive Portuguese right back :P

Is salah's ownership the main reason you want him? If he was to drop to say 30% would he lose some appeal?

I'm asking this as I think mane will be the highest owned Liverpool player sooner rather than later.

As you said yourself you'd be loosing a premium attacker trying to fit in salah.

shineon23 · 23-09-2018 12:44am

pimpmyhat wrote: »

Is salah's ownership the main reason you want him? If he was to drop to say 30% would he lose some appeal?

I'm asking this as I think mane will be the highest owned Liverpool player sooner rather than later.

As you said yourself you'd be loosing a premium attacker trying to fit in salah.

Basically yes. The majority of my rivals own Salah

I think I can get away without him for the Chelsea and Man city games. But if he starts hauling I'll be in trouble.

It was always my plan to get him (or Mane) in soon, but I think I'd rather block Salah's points rather than try and rely on Mane differential points against my rivals' Salah points, if that makes any sense.

Pep rotation/Mendy situation is also forcing me to think about moving Silva and Mendy on asap for guaranteed starters.

pimpmyhat · 23-09-2018 1:00am

Yes understood but if your rivals are active players there's a good chance they may ditch Salah. Just had a look Salah and mane almost identical ownership.

I wildcarded last week didn't even entertain man city mids.
Went for guaranteed starters.
Re Mendy I have him since the start so may just hold for now.

I got vardy and maddison in last week as have good fixtures, success so far.

I'd prob be looking at arsenal now for next gameweek as Chelsea Vs Liverpool could cancel each other out.

shineon23 · 23-09-2018 1:29am

pimpmyhat wrote: »

Yes understood but if your rivals are active players there's a good chance they may ditch Salah. Just had a look Salah and mane almost identical ownership.

I wildcarded last week didn't even entertain man city mids.
Went for guaranteed starters.
Re Mendy I have him since the start so may just hold for now.

I got vardy and maddison in last week as have good fixtures, success so far.

I'd prob be looking at arsenal now for next gameweek as Chelsea Vs Liverpool could cancel each other out.

There's very little chance they'll drop Salah,
purely going by their histories.

I had similar thinking on selling up my city MF cover.
I was set on selling Silva (ahead of this
week) but his goal last weekend and another player dropping in price made me hold on.
I feared the worst after he played 90 in Europe but I didn't want to take a -4 going into this gameweek.

Auba is my only arsenal cover and my main differential in attack, 10.9 (maybe 10.8) soon seems a lot of money for small returns so far. I like owning him and his returns last season were great.

Lacasette could give me the Arsenal cover and 1.5 more ITB,

I have a lot of head scratching to do over the week

This game is a lot tougher when I'm only half paying attention to what's going on.

sanket · 23-09-2018 5:10am

Deleted User wrote: »

km79 wrote: »

Why ?

I want to have double Chelsea and Pedro seems like he will be either rotated or subbed off a lot so his minutes will be reduced.
I've a hunch Giroud could be rotated depending on how high as line the other team play.
I dont fancy Kante to be able to produce enough going forward and whie Jorginhino is class again not a big points scorer

This leads me to Kovavic who I think won't be as big a rotaion risk (although seems to be subbed frequently enough himself)
Small sample but he is begining to line up well statistically for me. In terms of shot and key passes per game

Hazard gets a load of touches on the ball per game, with Chelsea playing so much through him it leads to the players around him getting more touches and more space as he often draws more then one player on to him.

If you look back Kovaic (position) is also getting more touches on the ball per minute then any other attacking position bar Hazards. (I'm not couting Jorghinio in this)

And more touches mean more chances of scoring and assisting. (in a team we expect to score a lot this season)

I could be way off here but I feel it is a good position to buy early on a player at a great price

Chelsea fan here..i have alonso and hazard and feel they are more than enough,alonso is as good as any chelsea mid barring hazard in terms of FPL points. Rather suggest you to invest somewhere else

Iused2likebusts · 23-09-2018 9:29am

If you think you want to captain a liverpool player its best that you have salah as he is the best option from that team.

machiavellianme · 23-09-2018 10:32am

shineon23 wrote: »

There's very little chance they'll drop Salah,
purely going by their histories.

I had similar thinking on selling up my city MF cover.
I was set on selling Silva (ahead of this
week) but his goal last weekend and another player dropping in price made me hold on.
I feared the worst after he played 90 in Europe but I didn't want to take a -4 going into this gameweek.

Auba is my only arsenal cover and my main differential in attack, 10.9 (maybe 10.8) soon seems a lot of money for small returns so far. I like owning him and his returns last season were great.

Lacasette could give me the Arsenal cover and 1.5 more ITB,

I have a lot of head scratching to do over the week
This game is a lot tougher when I'm only half paying attention to what's going on.

Why do you think you need arsenal cover?
You can't have a player from every team and you can't always have the exact players you want from those teams you do actually cover. Arsenal look like finishing between 8th and 5th but so do Leicester, Everton and Watford etc. Why not pick up a few stars from those teams and try squeeze in more premiums from the likes of City, Chelsea and Liverpool who will be fighting at the top and scoring more /conceding less than Arsenal?

Lemlin · 23-09-2018 11:16am

Burnley have good fixtures and Europa League is gone but who are their recognized starting strikers?

Is Hart guaranteed his place for much longer?

heartofwhite · 23-09-2018 11:21am

Can anyone shed light on why so many people have Mendy at the back (me included) instead of Laporte who costs 0.8 less and has started every game? Trying to decide i I should sell Mendy and replace with him free up cash.

Hogey007 · 23-09-2018 11:24am

heartofwhite wrote: »

Can anyone shed light on why so many people have Mendy at the back (me included) instead of Laporte who costs 0.8 less and has started every game? Trying to decide i I should sell Mendy and replace with him free up cash.

Mendy has huge attacking potential, Laporte doesn’t. Everyone who has mendy had him before this injury/incident.
Also with ottamendi back, Laporte is a little more at risk of rotation as one extra centre back to accommodate

Shanotheslayer · 23-09-2018 11:24am

heartofwhite wrote: »

Can anyone shed light on why so many people have Mendy at the back (me included) instead of Laporte who costs 0.8 less and has started every game? Trying to decide i I should sell Mendy and replace with him free up cash.

Laporte won't get near the same returns as Mendy come end of season. However he's the most nailed on defender when Mendy is injured and its who I have

Shedite27 · 23-09-2018 11:51am

Barring injury, Hazard to Salah this week.

Gave Salah one last chance this week, glad he got the goal but he still looks a 9m player rather than a 13m player. Have Mane as "cover".

If Hazard continues to get rested for Europa league then that can only be a good thing.

Peter File · 23-09-2018 11:59am

Pedro to maddison or Ricarlisson?

eagle eye · 23-09-2018 12:37pm

Fabregas is fit so Kovacic is a big rotation risk now.

Iused2likebusts · 23-09-2018 12:40pm

Lemlin wrote: »

Burnley have good fixtures and Europa League is gone but who are their recognized starting strikers?

Is Hart guaranteed his place for much longer?

Its harts place to lose. Their outfield players is a bit unsetttled. They have switched between 4 4 2 and 4 5 1. They have 4 strikers wood , vokes , vydra and barnes none of them are currently a standout first choice . Some weeks 2 out of those 4 start other weeks just 1. Gudmundson is the best burnley attacking option . Hart a good gk option . I have him myself. Charlie Taylor 4.4 i think has been starting LB ahead of ward might be worth a look too. Apart from that id steer clear for now.

siblers · 23-09-2018 12:41pm

Might get rid of Mané, think having him and Salah is overkill at the moment

Arnie is a problem too, always getting injured

Green&Red · 23-09-2018 12:47pm

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

Its harts place to leave. Their outfield players is a bit unsetttled. They have switched between 4 4 2 and 4 5 1. They have 4 strikers wood , vokes , vydra and barnes none of them are currently a standout first choice . Some weeks 2 out of those 4 start other weeks just 1. Gudmundson is the best burnley attacking option . Hart a good gk option . I have him myself. Charlie Taylor 4.4 i think has been starting LB ahead of ward might be worth a look too. Apart from that id steer clear for now.

I brought Hart in on a WC last week, got me 9pts yesterday, 2 save points and a BP in a team that got four goals, just behind him was Gudmundson with two assists. Burnley keepers have always been good scorers. It looks like Hart is nailed on

Green&Red · 23-09-2018 12:52pm

Looks like I’ve to get shot of Rico, came off at HT yesterday.
Anyone any insight into whether Peltier is now a sure thing?

shineon23 · 23-09-2018 1:01pm

machiavellianme wrote: »

Why do you think you need arsenal cover?
You can't have a player from every team and you can't always have the exact players you want from those teams you do actually cover. Arsenal look like finishing between 8th and 5th but so do Leicester, Everton and Watford etc. Why not pick up a few stars from those teams and try squeeze in more premiums from the likes of City, Chelsea and Liverpool who will be fighting at the top and scoring more /conceding less than Arsenal?

They have, good fixtures.
They have goals In their team, 14 goals in last 5 games in all Comps since City in GW1.
Wouldn't touch their defence at the minute though.
Auba is my differential and I think he has the ability to bring a monster score in any given week.
I don't think Lacca has as high of a ceiling, but I like him as a player. And that extra 1.4 now could come in handy. But don't think I'll be able to squeeze him in, in any case.

I just see them as good FPL points potential, and their players have low ownership in my main league.

I'm maxed out on City and Chelsea, and want Salah from Liverpool so that's those 3 clubs covered.

Agree with you on Leicester, everton and Watford, but I see these as clubs I can do without players from. I rather cut corners here than on the likes of the traditional top 6.

I have Walcott but have my eye in Richarlison,
Leicester interest me have no space for anyone at the moment, I'll be very surprised if Watford continue as they have been playing so not getting involved with them

bantee · 23-09-2018 1:08pm

Green&Red wrote: »

Looks like I’ve to get shot of Rico, came off at HT yesterday.
Anyone any insight into whether Peltier is now a sure thing?

Was Peltier not stretchered off yesterday? Or maybe I’m thinking of someone else

Shanotheslayer · 23-09-2018 1:16pm

What are people doing with the double Chelsea / double or triple Liverpool conundrum next week?

GW7 Transfers

Comments