blackwhite wrote: My issue is with houses/apartments that aren’t being lived in anymore, and are just pure short term lets. To me that’s a change of use
Edgware wrote: » 1000? Is that all? The usual rent a mob so
blackwhite wrote: » Strange how people think targeting the general public instead of those responsible for the problems isn’t a legitimate for of protest :rolleyes:Scumbags being scumbags tend to be condemned by right-minded people, regardless of the day of the week
guylikeme wrote: » Are you suggesting they follow Varakakar home or something? Awareness is a big part of this and sadly the column inches given to reporting this dont come without a cost. Id like you to propose a way for them to peacefully protest that gets the needed attention.
Deleted User wrote: » The woman and her little kid pictured further down in that RTE news report are scumbags? Cop yourself on and less of the lazy generalisations please.......
blackwhite wrote: » Anyone who forces their child to participate in something like this deserves to be called exactly what they are. I see the usual crowd who despise the taxpayers of Ireland have arrived :rolleyes: Why don’t you tell us again about how commuters who live outside Dublin “deserve” any hardships they face? Showed your true colours there
Deleted User wrote: » 'Forces their child'. Yep, they look in a right state of terror.....:rolleyes: I work and pay my tax too so you know where you can stick that accusation my boy...... 'True colours'? Meh. More an insight actually into an ultimately unsustainable lifestyle.
blackwhite wrote: You let the mask slip with previous comments on this thread. Can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube after nasty comments like those
Hitman3000 wrote: » Lobby your local TD so to change the rules. Air BnB is not a new thing. Hard to imagine no one in government is ignorant of it . Up to the government to legislate for the area. Wonder why they haven't?
Hitman3000 wrote: » Calling other people scum including kids is right up there in terms of nastiness tbh. Pot and kettle spring to mind.
Hitman3000 wrote: » Lobby your local TD so to change the rules.
blackwhite wrote: I’ve already stated I’m not referring to kids who’ve been dragged along by their parents. I severely doubt the kids were the ones deciding to project their own issues into sticking two fingers up at the majority of citizens in the capital.
Hitman3000 wrote: » They're not sticking their fingers up to the citizens. They are doing what the constitution allows.The right to protest is an important right in any functioning democracy. My point about referring to other people as scum still stands.
John.Icy wrote: » What is with boards.ie and forever thinking anyone who protests who fights for what they believe in is a scumbag or a degenerate? The amount of people who are dismissive of the housing crisis is frightening. For every person out there fighting for rent control, more housing, the homeless crisis to be worked on etc etc - there's someone out there telling them to get a job and shut up. Giving the government and landlords a mandate to do whatever they please. What the actual f**k is wrong with this country.
Captain Obvious wrote: » First of all, Johnny, I feel I should point out to you that how fast you type doesn't dictate how fast someone reads a forum post.
Secondly, it has been pointed out a number of times that the hoods the Gardaear are part of the public order uniform. They just happen to be flame retardant, as are the overalls. Wearing them does not mean you expect to be in a fire. They also provide other protections, from the weather to smoke. You ask what they were expecting. I'd say they were expecting to be there for a while and wearing the thick leather gloves and heavy helmet and exterior body armour seemed like too much to wear at that time so they left them in the van in case they were needed so they could get ready quickly. It's just practical.
The only criticism from the Commissioner was that helmets should also have been worn too. You said the optics were bad. Is it your point that helmets would have been made these optics better?
blackwhite wrote: If people behave like scum then they deserved to be called it.
blackwhite wrote: » You let the mask slip with previous comments on this thread. Can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube after nasty comments like those
blackwhite wrote: » And the strawman arguments begin. There’s a major difference between a protest rally, or a pre-advertised march and the scummy behaviour currently going on at O’Connell Bridge. Bare-faced lies trying to claim that “anyone who protests” is being labelled a scumbag just show you up TBH
blackwhite wrote: Protesting by targeting people who have nothing to do with your issue is scummy. If people don’t like being labelled a scumbag, then maybe don’t act like one
Deleted User wrote: » 'Mask slip'. B*ll*x. Nothing nasty about them. People have moaned endlessly about the commuting lifestyle in these forums and elsewhere yet have done precisely nothing in an attempt to start change round the issue. Do nothing, deserve nothing. Nasty comments and you are going on about 'scumbags'????? Reactionary nonsense like you are coming out with deserves to be called out every time.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » How come they don't occupy a ghost Estate in the Midlands and demand it be finished off for homeless families? Sure that'd get a couple of hundred of people homes straight away.............
Hitman3000 wrote: » You don't seem to understand how protest works tbh. The idea is to cause disruption.
John.Icy wrote: » What do you suggest? Picket Leinster House? As if that makes a difference. Nearly every protest/march through a city involves a holdup of traffic. Todays demonstration was pre-advertised too.