Bob24 wrote: » Talk is cheap and an executive showing optimism about their company’s product or surprising and in no way a commitment.
makeorbrake wrote: » I'm open to correction but my understanding is that it's been well tested and it works. He just stated that xRapid would probably be launched generally within the next month. What I don't get is how just that snippet of info is responsible for a 40% increase in 48 hours. The benefits of xRapid were already known and there was a general indication of timeline. Surely this would have been priced in already.
grindle wrote: » The idea of news being priced-in makes much more sense for dividend earning stocks, not so much for an asset which still isn't being utilised beyond pilot-tests which many people got to buy under $0.01 ~18 months ago. Same old crypto story - thin order books means positive buy pressure doesn't have to be very high at all to make the price skyrocket and cause FOMO over the course of a week. Looking at the inital 10% bump on September 18th and adjusting USD volume to take the price increase into account it looks like the cap had a billion added to it with a little over $50m of positive buying. Less than two-fold increase in price so far yet four-fold increase in volume since then, it looks like they've done a fine job of getting people to jump onto the gravy train and volume's still growing. If this is anything like last year you'll see BTC and/or ETH whales use their newfound gains to push XRP profits into those respective coins, maybe pump their favourite shítcoins for very little cost. There are many coins that could be 100x-ed within a day if 1% of XRP's volume flicked their way so getting alts to have a random 10-50% + is extremely inexpensive now for anybody profiting from XRP's rise.
Tinder Surprise wrote: » Are you in crypto fulltime*?
grindle wrote: »
ZeroThreat wrote: » hope you give the keybaord a good 'aul cleaning after 3pm
Truckermal wrote: » I hope some of you purchased last week when it was down!
Stokolan wrote: » I swapped about 60% of my stellar for Ripple at the first jump when it hit .27c. I think I made a good choice... for the moment anyway
Stokolan wrote: » I think I made a good choice... for the moment anyway
grindle wrote: » Be careful and set a stop loss! It's reaching volumes it hasn't seen in 5 months and @ 60% of it's ATH vs BTC.
Truckermal wrote: » What price should one sell?
Pussyhands wrote: » Overall number 2 now.
makeorbrake wrote: » Huh? You advising us of your 'movements'?:D
BrokenArrows wrote: » He means it has overtaken ETH by market capital and is now the 2nd largest crypto after BTC
Bob24 wrote: » Wondering if this is going to last a be short lived as it was last time XRP took over ETH. (And on a side note, it also means bitcoin dominance is dropping)
lanciadub wrote: » its neck and neck
Mr.S wrote: » I do enjoy all the reddit and twitter folk predicting $3-4 by next week
Bob24 wrote: » Let’s put it that way: if Ripple announces that a bank is using xRapid in production by next week, they might well be right.
makeorbrake wrote: » Well, if they have banks already signed up and using xCurrent, surely it's logical that they would use xRapid (unless there's some regulatory issue that's not being talked about)? By all accounts, it's use will have to be limited to certain 'corridors' first - due to liquidity of XRP.
Bob24 wrote: » Regulation is the key issue I’d say. It’s probably seen as a huge risk for a financial institution to start using XRP as a money conduit with no clarity on its legal status. This is why I would be surprised to see a bank using it before there is a clear ruling on whether it is a security. But I might be wrong ...