Sam Russell wrote: » The trams in Nice lower their catenaries at a stop and proceed on batteries and raise the catenaries at the next stop. I would imagine the train would need to be stationary while it changed over.
Telchak wrote: » I think it's no bi-mode trains, rather than hybrid, that are what they're looking at. Catenaries lower, and a small diesel locomotive kicks in.
Rulmeq wrote: » Do you know if they are able to switch from Diesel to electric on the fly? I would have expected them to require modification to work with either?
MJohnston wrote: » Yes, that's correct. No room in the PPT for it. Which is why I've been very curious about hybrid trains recently, as it would mean short gaps like that wouldn't matter.
roadmaster wrote: » I am not sure if i am reading the irish rail website correct but it seams to say the electrification from hazzlehatch only goes to heuston and not through the PPT . Is that correct or am i reading it wrong?http://www.irishrail.ie/about-us/projects-investment/dart-expansion-programme
Dats me wrote: » This is from the National Development Plan: "NTA and Irish Rail currently in the process of defining an over-all integrated schedule for the DART Expansion Programme. NTA have appointment a specialist advisory team to progress the commencement of new fleet tender competition in Q4, 2018 and award a contract in 2019. It is expected that the electrification/resignalling programme will commence in 2021/2022." Also in that hiring list, why are they looking for a manager for the City-Centre resignalling? Is that not done?
Grandeeod wrote: » Not a lot to do with the Wonga. FG simply do not believe in DU and believe their Metrolink idea combined with DART expansion via Tara Street and Phisboro is the future. Its not even their idea. It was ripped off from suggested plans for the original Metro North and believe it or not the campaign to get the PPT route working again. Goes all the way back to 2003. A classic example of politicians interfering. The NTA are doing what they are told to do.
D.L.R. wrote: » This is really dumb. Lets stick to DU and leave the stunning geopolitical insight for another thread.
D.L.R. wrote: » Currently this one horse state is still too busy paying off its wonga.com debts to organise the financing or ambition for DU.
D.L.R. wrote: » This is really dumb. Lets stick to DU and leave the stunning geopolitical insight for another thread. Currently this one horse state is still too busy paying off its wonga.com debts to organise the financing or ambition for DU.
cgcsb wrote: » Ireland's slow drift away from British popular culture just stepped up about 5 gears after Brexit, and America is now widely viewed as 'finished' from a popular culture point of view.
cgcsb wrote: » You don't need massive taxation to have reasonable public transport in place. Spain has metro and/or tram networks in place or under construction in 20 of it's Cities, including the 1 line underground system in Granada(250,000 people) and the 2 line underground system in the Island community of Palma de Majorca(550,000 in the metropolitan area). Not to mention the extensive electric commuter rail and tram networks that exist across the country and the national high speed rail network that connects them all, transversing Spain's sparsely populated interior. This is all accomplished ontop of free healthcare, with half the youth unemployed, similar personal taxation to Ireland and fares rarely surpass €2 in the cities. Corruption in Spain would make even Haughy blush with embarrassment. It's quite simply a matter of mindset. In the English speaking world our interests typically end at the hedge of the bottom of our gardens, especially in highly ruralised Ireland. People screaming about Dublin being 'too small' for metro or Cork being 'too small' for tram are only aping Brit/Yankee behaviour. This is rapidly changing though, Ireland's slow drift away from British popular culture just stepped up about 5 gears after Brexit, and America is now widely viewed as 'finished' from a popular culture point of view.
loyatemu wrote: » it has been "postponed" - as the most recent transport plans cover up to 2028, it's unlikely to start before then. If there is any planning ongoing it's presumably fairly low-priority considering the NTA are working on MetroLink, BusConnects etc and Irish Rail are busy buggering up the Dart timetables.
Dats me wrote: » Do we know whether DART Underground is currently being planned? Is it Irish Rail or the NTA who would be designing? (We can presume NTA would be very busy at the moment). Based on discussions on the MetroLink thread and looking at a map, if MetroLink sticks with the Tara station, DU could go from Christchurch to Tara to Docklands. This would skip both the cost of the Stephen's Green station and the cost of tunnelling for that big loop down from Pearse and back up. Given there were only 4 underground stations originally, could the saved tunnelling and station costs shave off 30% of the price?
MayoSalmon wrote: » The Personal Income Tax Rate in Sweden stands at 61.85 percent...eh no thanks!
D.L.R. wrote: » If they built a raised station on top of the DU footprint, this could be used for Maynooth and Sligo services, and even Northern line and Kildare services. Once DU is in place it could serve the Enterprise too, if there were enough platforms factored in. You could have retail on a ground floor concourse, and create a beating heart hub for the Docklands. Of course this would require a state with actual ambition and foresight regards rail.
roadmaster wrote: » Where they are talking of moving docklands to do NTA/CIE have a version of a CPO on the land around it or is building a underground station in the planning for the office/apartment block Because from what i am hearing the developer is eager to get building there.
D.L.R. wrote: » Integrating Docklands with tram & future Dart Underground is a no brainer, and the route is still available. There's no reason NOT to do it, besides money. All they need to do is finalise the revised DU route and then just bite the bullet and build the DU box at the same time. We need to actually start building this stuff.
Zebra3 wrote: » I’d gladly take the higher standard of living.