PARlance wrote: » I would have to disagree with one major point there, she was far from fantastic in that game. I thought it was an embarrassing display. I don't have the time to go back and look at the comments, but there were certainly a few on here saying the same. She wanted to do it all that day, and her day of doing it all is gone. It's definitely gone now.
Floppybits wrote: » Well it was going to happen, the statement the players gave when this blew up and then the Cora Staunton interview on Off the ball and finally todays press release which had all the buzzwords such as intimidation, being undermined, being isolated and cream on top Mental health, is not showing the girls in a good light. The only evidence they gave to back this up was the captain being criticised for her performances in training.
flasher0030 wrote: » If everything is taken at face value, sounds to me like he just likes to use bully boy tactics. This old fashioned idea that “I am the manager. My way or the highway” is old-fashioned tripe. A manager is there is manage facilities, teams etc. but also to manage people. And people come with different personalities. On the basis of the way that he spoke to Sarah Tierney (if it is fully true), I would have given him a shoe in the h0le. He is there to encourage players to express themselves to play the best football they can and to enjoy it. Not to ignite conflict and bad vibes within a camp. Take the example of the most successful football manager in the past number of years. I don’t know Jim Gavin personally, but could you imagine him ringing up Stephen Cluxton to give him a boll0cking for making an innocuous comment like any chance of a bit of ballwork. I don’t think so.
benji79 wrote: » A player is there to manage people you say. What about people who don’t want to be managed, how do you deal with them?
homewardbound11 wrote: » Leahys interview was very well orchestrated. But I found him continuously deflecting towards health and safety . If Sarah is to believed and no reason why not then there is no place for intimidation like that in women’s football . Without being sexiest is it really a good attribute to have in men’s football either . Wouldn’t think Gavin or rochford or Fismaurice would get the most out of his teams with intimidation .
[Deleted User] wrote: » It's certainly not a modern or progressive way to manage a team and not something that I would like to see in a county team. But it's painfully obvious that the ladies who left did so in an attempt to force his resignation and were extremely reckless with the language that they used in doing so. That was too far and they have went down in peoples estimation because of that, and also because of the fact they made themselves greater than the team.
Panrich wrote: » This has spiralled out of control on all sides now. Whether the county board and Leahy stick to their guns, or we have a change, we'll be put back decades in ladies football in the county with the loss of so many players. The hope that something could be worked out has been dashed by the latest round of media interviews.
crusier wrote: » This is a very slippery road, if your in management now and you drop a player you are responsible for a mental health issue. This is the end! I knew this would happen when they got the vote!
clint_silver wrote: Leahy is looking at his squad and thinking the ladies game is gone beyond an individual, they discuss it internally, all his management, they decide that Staunton can be used to best effect as a sub. She'll disagree naturally, her feelings will be very hurt.
Happyilylost wrote: » Forget about Staunton. And maybe many would say you can't because she is core to the issue. But I would simply for the sake of both sides of the story ask how can the manager speak with such high regard for Sarah Tierney and yet the statement today seems to focus on the "turmoil" this lady went through. The two don't add up. It's not unreasonable to think this lady would of had meetings outside the group of players with management. She obviously wasn't happy. Maybe she was and it's all driven by Cora or the other 10 but for me it doesn't add up.
TCDStudent1 wrote: » I think he may have been alluding to her being unhappy in the interview. For example, he was saying stuff like Sarah Tierney always wanted the best for the players etc. My impression was that there was a major personality clash between him & Tierney throughout the year. However, he felt that the Carnacon girls issue was purely selection based.
mayo.mick wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/ladies-football/mayo-lgfa-fail-in-their-bid-to-have-carnacon-thrown-out-of-the-championship-but-the-club-are-fined-and-eight-players-are-suspended-37331647.html
clint_silver wrote: » mayo.mick wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/ladies-football/mayo-lgfa-fail-in-their-bid-to-have-carnacon-thrown-out-of-the-championship-but-the-club-are-fined-and-eight-players-are-suspended-37331647.html Sounds reasonable although it would imply in appealing that the Mayo board put the blame, in some portion at least, at the door of the club. Does the 4 week ban affect any games for the club?
seligehgit wrote: » All hell breaks loose while I'm abroad. Sadly all ends up with a massive and unlikely to be repaired schism in the Mayo ladies panel. Update on Mayo management position. Mayo News Football Podcast 2018 - Manager Updatehttps://themayonews.podomatic.com/enclosure/2018-09-18T08_52_07-07_00.mp3