pc7 wrote: » did anyone else think it strange they managed to sue the palladin press over the book?
glasso wrote: » fiinding casefile not that compelling for the most part over the last few months. nothing changed on that front with this week's podcast.
dastardly00 wrote: » Anyone listen to Case 95: The Vampire of Krakow yet? Any good?
Pidae.m wrote: » 3 parter starting this weekend
IvyTheTerrific wrote: » Thé Wests, I wonder?
bobsman wrote: » Love casefile but don't think I'll listen to the next two parts of this. Just horrific.
miamee wrote: » I'm part way through part one here and it's easily one of the most disturbing ones I've heard so far. Probably will continue to listen to the next two parts unless it gets really bad, like Kingp35, there is very littel that I find I cannot listen to. I'm not sure if that is a good or bad thing
reap-a-rat wrote: » I'm pretty desensitized to this type of thing - I'm not finding this too disturbing, though the backyard comment sent a shiver down my spine. Actually the case that affected me the most was Daniel Morcombe - I shed a tear at the end of that episode.
Pidae.m wrote: » David Parker Ray.... Tough listen
tomwaits48 wrote: » episode 3 of the jonestown massacre is particularly horrific.