TheCitizen wrote: » LOL at the right wingers on here that don't like the occupy stunt. I'm not totally in agreement with all of the tactics of the Take Back the City campaign myself but they're succeeding in highlighting the issue and the lack of action relating to it.
NIMAN wrote: » People also need to realise that Dublin is now a major European capital city. Like Paris, Rome, Madrid, Berlin etc. It is very attractive to major employers and multi-nationals, and as a result we have tens of thousands more people looking for accommodation. This is turn drives up rent and house prices. If you think you are going to find nice houses for little money/rent, you are sadly mistaken. Those days are gone.
TheCitizen wrote: » :pac: Those days have been gone a long time. Do you think it should be as expensive to rent in damp Dublin as it is in Paris, Madrid, Berlin etc.? Seriously this is the sort of claptrap that leads to a situation where young professional people can't buy a house or end up spending all their money on renting a house in Dublin. Delusional, idiotic stuff.
NIMAN wrote: » The simple economics of supply and demand do that.
fxotoole wrote: » Lol at the SJWs snowflakes who think those who think differently to them are right wingers
Jensen White Robot wrote: » Interesting when you're the one constantly preaching at people here to help others. He had a life of great privilege - well off family, big house, private school, universities, teaching job... and he gave it all up to help people on the streets, depending on fundraising, living in tough communities when he could have lived in a nice place and had a teaching job. And you have the gall to say he sacrificed nothing?! I can tell you he did a lot more for people in need than preaching on the internet. Surely he's the kind of person you'd look up to? What's your real issue with him?
NIMAN wrote: » The simple economics of supply and demand do that. And what has the weather got to do with anything? Dublin is home to probably as many major employers as Paris, Madrid etc, so why shouldn't rent be as high?
MFPM wrote: » I'd suggest you get yourself a history book, read it and then come back and edit or delete this idiotic sentence.
Graces7 wrote: » No, he decided he had a vocation to the priesthood, that is a high calling and a high honour that makes all that you have listed meaningless That was the vocation. Like hundreds of other men who became priests? Within the Catholic Church, the richest land and property owner in the country, that could house every last homeless person and not notice it. That has scores of empty properties. A priest is supposed to help folk. Period. Not a sacrifice but an honour. In fact he is all talk. Fine words, demanding money and houses off others rather than from his church. All hollow . Never once a real offer of help. And this is what he is doing now and inciting breaking the law to do it?
Yer Da sells Avon wrote: » Most people don't want 'free houses' - they just want to be able to work and live in Dublin at an affordable cost.
Jensen White Robot wrote: » No he is "in fact" not all talk. He has done a massive amount to help people, priest or not. And a heck of a lot more than you've ever done. Nasty as hell to downplay all he has done. And no doubt you'd use it to defend the Catholic church when it suits, being the super contrarian that you are. I disagree with him this time around but it doesn't change all the work he has done for many people.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: I remember you were all over the ms cash thread defending her and saying let’s not jump to conclusions.
Graces7 wrote: » ? please explain
CruelCoin wrote: » And therein lies the absolute fantasy. An average earner cannot, and should not be able to live in a premium area. Until the planning laws change and we can slap up some projects style tenement blocks, it will never be affordable for street sweepers and burger flippers to buy within the M50.
TheCitizen wrote: » Supply and demand is the kernel of the problem. The supply isn't there while property in prime areas of our towns an cities are left unoccupied and abandoned. Dublin is the capital city of a small country on the west of Europe, it should not cost the same in terms of accommodation to live in Dublin as it does in Paris etc., don't be ridiculous.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » I feel sorry for the Garda when elected tds and priests are encouraging people to break the law. Something seems to be simmering here and gathering momentum and it’s not pleasant. The Garda are the only barrier between a break down of law and order in society.
MFPM wrote: » Christians and law breaking....Martin Luther King, Bishop Tutu, Bishop Romero and on, and on, and on, and on......
Hitman3000 wrote: » Right up till further information and facts were posted about her.
BPKS wrote: » Of course its not that simple, but it certainly is a contributory factor. If you have spent your life watching the people all around you getting housing for little or nothing, weekly social welfare payments, monthly payment for every child they have, getting a medical card, back to school allowance and so on and so on, then why would they bother getting themselves into a situation where they could afford to pay out of their own pocket for education, a mortgage etc.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: The Garda are the only barrier between a break down of law and order in society.
Fr_Dougal wrote: » I have helped fundraise for years for the Peter McVerry Trust, but I’m cutting all ties with them now because of this. Very disappointed with his comments, he has gone down a lot in my estimations, scumbag mentality.
Graces7 wrote: » :eek:
_Brian wrote: » Risk, Risk, Risk. Landlords are expected to hand over a €300-€500k asset to strangers with a €1500 deposit, the law is structured so tenants are safe to overstay and stop paying and probably get to stay for six months at this carry on, and then get the sympathy of every bleeding heart who listens. Then there is damage to property that needs to be repaired. Our local council have substantial empty property but much of that was left uninhabitable by previous tenants who likely were moved to another good house. If landlords are expected to take that risk the potential profits need to be substantial.