Capt'n Midnight wrote: » ^^^^
JRant wrote: » As late as the mid 1940's radioactive products were still being sold to the general public.
Wibbs wrote: » The radiation is cut quite appreciably when the lid is down. The case and lid is silver so maybe that's it? Silver is quite dense a metal. I'd expect the much rarer gold cases would cut the radiation even more.
Carry wrote: » A horrible death for the sake of luminous clock-faces.
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » Jaysus, with the amount of random countries laying claim to the place, we might as well just declare a chunk of it to be Irish. Sure why not? I don't see any good reason why Britain would have a better claim than we would.
mzungu wrote: » The only non-human or puppet to testify before Congress was Elmo in 2002. He was making an appeal for increased funding for new music education programmes.
Water John wrote: » An Outpost of the Peoples Republic of Cork.
Wibbs wrote: » IIRC Radium is a bugger because its a heavy gamma producer. Tritium's output would be stopped by the case and glass of the watch. The only real risk would have been to watchmakers who had to open the case to service the movement. The radium mixes also broke down like a bugger. Extremely hygroscopic, so suck up the damp from the atmosphere, which makes them break down even more. into dust that permeates everything. Dust you really would not want to breathe in. Would make a 60 a day ciggie habit look healthy. Years back in the 90's a watch of mine from the 1930's was tested by a lass I knew who was writing up a paper on radioactive sources in the home and was described as "low level nuclear waste"(she got quite panicked. And she wasn't the type). I got the dial cleaned and reprinted, but the movement also needed to be stripped right down and cleaned as it was emitting radiation of its own from the accumulated dust. As a kid I regularly used to wear that watch to bed as the loud ticking calmed me.... Me. Earlier. :eek:
Capt'n Midnight wrote: »
Wibbs wrote: » They do mention clocks, but radium dialled watches were going well into the 1960's. Then for luminous dials they went to Tritium. Far less "hot", but still radioactive. That went on into the 90's in standard form, with a foray into promethium in the 80's(very short half life to drive the glow, two years IIRC). Today you can buy Tritium dialled watches where the tritium is encapsulated in vials to reduce the exposure by a large amount(down to basically nothing). With all these "luminous" dials, the radioactive substance itself doesn't luminess, it charges the phosphorescent material mixed with it. You know your usual luminous watch these days that glows after exposure to the sun? Well the old style radium/promethium/tritium takes the place of the sun. Radium was so active it burnt out the phosphorescent material within a couple of years(early wiristwatch adverts guaranteed two years glowing). However, even though the old dials don't glow anymore, the radium, with (IIRC) a half life of over 1500 years is still as active and potentially deadly today. Here's one of my personal hoard of World War One "trench" watches. Avec radium dial. .
MikeyTaylor wrote: » Vince Clarke (Erasure/Depeche Mode/Yazoo) does his songwriting on an acoustic guitar!http://www.musicradar.com/news/vince-clarke-im-not-a-good-enough-keyboard-player-to-write-on-the-synth
RiderOnTheStorm wrote: » when I worked in IT we discovered a bug in one of the financial packages. After hours and hours of investigations we narrowed it down to the addition of two variables. One contains a value of 4, the other contained a value of 3, and when they were added together the sum was 6.999 ..... We fixed it, but never figured out why. Computers can be a right pain!
lan wrote: » The values that they are off by are really tiny, but it can still cause problems, the most common are generally when converting them to a whole number (by default, a lot of programming languages will truncate a decimal instead of rounding) or when comparing them to numbers (0.999999 does not equal 1).
RIGOLO wrote: » Is that a German or British 'Trench' watch ? Just curious , who were they given too.
bodhrandude wrote: » I bet you knew that its not hens that smell but their poo.
Fourier wrote: » The part in bold is true, but as a strange fact 0.9999... (9 repeating endlessly) does equal 1.
IvyTheTerrific wrote: » And that's not a new trick to catch out fraudsters. Dictionary makers put fake words in dictionaries and map makers put false features on their maps so they can tell when they've been copied.
FishOnABike wrote: » I would said it is more correct to say it approaches 1 rather than it equals 1.