Squatter wrote: » promptly refused to take questions from the media gathered for her campaign launch
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/presidential-election-2018/ras-hopeful-liadh-n-riada-is-unsuitable-to-represent-the-country-says-son-of-ira-victim-37322848.html Austin Stack weighs in on the merits of the Sinn Fein candidate. He makes some interesting points about the ability to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces. Unlike Mary Robinson and Mary McAleese who were able to reach out to Unionism, Ms. Ni Riadh will have difficulties in that sphere.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Anti-vax issue was raised, questions not answered, spokesperson later referred to her earlier statement saying she supports HPV vaccinations.RTE head pointed out that the statement did not state that her daughter ever got the vaccine.
For Forks Sake wrote: » Kevin Sharkey bows out, uses the opportunity for a spot of shameless self promotion and lends his support, such as it is, to O'Dohertyhttps://twitter.com/votesharkey2018/status/1041387542690586624?s=19
VinLieger wrote: » :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Squatter wrote: » I only needed to read as far as the second sentence of that report. "Ireland South MEP Liadh Ní Riada was yesterday unveiled as Sinn Féin's candidate - and promptly refused to take questions from the media gathered for her campaign launch." to know that voting for her would be a complete waste of time. Although she has known for months that she was a shoo-in for the SF nomination, she still wasn't able to take questions, no doubt gagged by her SF handlers in case she put her foot in it! (Like Marty Mac did when he attacked "West Brits" in the early stages of his campaign!)
Henryhill2 wrote: » Can anyone synopsise what the motivation of the dragons is and how much it's costing them and the taxpayer each?
eastwest wrote: » Surprising that the army council hadn't given her a prepared list of stock answers, but maybe they had other hopes for a different candidate.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » Even the act of 'bowing out' is in itself a piece of attention seeking. Let the councils and the Oireachtas members decide when you're out of the race, or if you were truly in it in the first race.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » But you only get those expenses is you reach 12.5% on the day, which only Higgins, McGuinness and Gallagher did last time. Dana only spent 60K last time. I don't think each additional hopeless candidate costs the taxpayer much, and SF were going to force an election regardless. The only poll so far says Higgins and Gallagher get expenses, everyone else loses their shirt.
jmcc wrote: » Haven't noticed it yet? Look at the way that the Aras expenses have been floated over the last few weeks and the mention of questions being asked at the Public Accounts Committee. The whole champagne socialist thing is going to be a major liability for the Higgins campaign and it will be exploited. Regards...jmcc
davycc wrote: » Conspiracy theories forum over that way ^
Squatter wrote: » Have to say that the vision of a shirtless of Ni Riada or Freeman give me the willies. :eek: Ladies, whatever may happen, I beseech you to keep your shirts on! As a matter of interest does anyone know who'll be looking after Munster's interests in Europe while both Brian Crowley (the permanently missing MEP) and Ni Riada are awol?
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Dana only spent 60K last time.
Henryhill2 wrote: » This stuff that's coming out about MDH not working with business and the IDA Is that coming from Gallagher's camp? It would play in his favour
TheRiverman wrote: » There has to be only one result in all this fiasco,a landslide victory for Micheal D.
expectationlost wrote: » what stuff? if Gallagher wants to work for the IDA he should apply for job there