Sinus pain wrote: » It was the public order unit. I’m sure they were aware there would be a lot of press there and posts on social media and rightly or wrongly they didn’t want their faces posted all over the place - or they wanted to come across as intimidating?
corner of hells wrote: » Shame on you , shame on you , SHAME ON YOU....
blanch152 wrote: » Have we found out yet why the idiots who occupied the building thought they could achieve anything?
guylikeme wrote: » I guess that the same was thought about the tank man in China. Rosa Parks on that bus. Numerous other examples. Raising awareness of failed policies does achieve these things bit by bit.
The men then drove off in a white van, which had no front registration plate, and a British registration plate on the back.
Hurrache wrote: » Private security firm, it's already in the thread. No need to make it anymore sinister than it is.
The men wearing balaclavas boarded up the entrance after an hour inside the property. The men would not identify themselves, or who they were acting for, when approached by The Irish Times.
riffmongous wrote: » According to the IT they wouldn't identify themselves
Ipso wrote: » White van, isn't that what pedos use?
Bethany Long Pensioner wrote: » And the guards are literally doing their job.
georgiecasey wrote: » don't like it that the guards decided to cover their faces, something you'd see in italy when they're arresting mob bosses. i understand why they did though
Hurrache wrote: » Why should they?