Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Because all he’s going to do is send her to hospital.
Pedro Fluffy Apprentice wrote: » To the posters saying they should have gone to their GP - genuinely have you every been in a situation where a very elderly parent, not in the best of health, becomes ill during the night or early in the morning? Often, waiting for the surgery to open so you can ring and maybe get an appointment later that afternoon, and then have to move your vomiting or dizzy or very very frail and weak parent from their bed to the car and then out of the car and into the doctor's waiting room is just not an option.You have to call an ambulance because you have no idea how serious it is and, at that age, you really can't afford to take the risk or try and move the ill person by yourself.
Pedro Fluffy Apprentice wrote: » Yes I know very well how A&E works. I've been there many times with elderly parents. On several occasions they were extremely ill but were still left on trolleys for hours and hours. It's not always that easy to get an ill, very elderly and not very mobile patient to a GP even if you were lucky enough to get an appointment. Sometimes your only option is to call an ambulance as it's just not possible to get them into a car and then out of the car and into the surgery. If GPs still did house calls it would be a different matter.
Pedro Fluffy Apprentice wrote: » But it turned out that she did need to be hospitalised, but it took 25 hours to get her out of a chair and into a bed. We either need a better system where elderly and infirm people can be visited at home by GPs, or A&E Depts and hospitals that are better resourced.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » So the 92 year old should have cured herself? A bit of personal responsibility and she’d have been seen sooner?
Berserker wrote: » Firstly, this lady didn't need to go to A&E, as you've said. A&E isn't the place for people who have not had an accident or who are not in need of emergency care. What personal responsibility? What could they have done differently? Are you suggesting that they prioritise this lady over another patient? He or she would not have sent her to hospital. She did not need to be hospitalised.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » If she'd arrived by ambulance she would have been on a trolley. And they do. But you have to pay.
Shenshen wrote: » I'm sorry, but I don't quite follow - why should a 92 year old not go see a GP?
1982 wrote: » Incorrect on both counts. If she had arrived by ambulance it would have been on an ambulance trolley, she would have been transferred to either a hospital trolley or chair. As for GPs doing house calls, that is almost unheard of in Dublin these days. There are out of hours clinics but these are still not 24/7. I completely agree with people saying you should only visit A&E when necessary and I have seen people present for terrible reasons but if a 92 year old woman suddenly becomes unwell your company you are not going to risk using your total lack of medical knowledge to asses the situation yourself.
Odhinn wrote: » Few GP's do house calls. The quality of locums varies wildly. And besides, odds are they'll say go to A&E anyway.
Berserker wrote: » Firstly, this lady didn't need to go to A&E, as you've said. A&E isn't the place for people who have not had an accident or who are not in need of emergency care.
What personal responsibility? What could they have done differently? Are you suggesting that they prioritise this lady over another patient?
He or she would not have sent her to hospital. She did not need to be hospitalised.
Pedro Fluffy Apprentice wrote: » The only time we used one for my elderly father, it took 5 hours for him to arrive, he spoke very poor English and had no knowledge of my father's medical history. That's not satisfactory and we never risked it again.
Pedro Fluffy Apprentice wrote: » I'm wondering how many of the 40 people who liked the third post on this thread have ever had the worry of a very old and infirm relative being suddenly taken ill with no way of getting them to the surgery. All this 'why didn't she just go to the GP'. I only wish it was that simple.
Hammer89 wrote: » What constitutes a minor illness if you're 92
CeilingFly wrote: » Why did her daughter not take her to her local GP? A&E - ACCIDENT and EMERGENCY - this was just someone who felt a little unwell and obviously when seen by the triage was deemed not a priority. Her daughter needs to wake up and stop clogging up ACCIDENT and EMERGENCY departments for minor illness And then whine to the fickle hysterical media who do a sensationalist piece leaving out a lot of facts so that some fools can get all hysterical. Never ever ever fully believe the sh1te written in hysterical sensationalist media - ESPECIALLY the Indo.
Shenshen wrote: » I'm overall rather shocked at the state of GPs in this country, and I do think the lack of qualification there is a massive contributing factor to the state of A&Es.
TallGlass wrote: » Had to do it once and seemingly regular my advise after my day and a half chair experience at least purchase some ****ing decent chairs that are fit for the purpose to hold people for a day and a half.
redshoes15 wrote: » I don’t blame the junkies.
Shenshen wrote: » Why? Do GPs refuse to treat the elderly?
arctictree wrote: » I can get a Vet out to my house any time of the day or night for 50 euro and they are generally here within the hour. What is it about Doctors that refuse to provide a service like that?