nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Two Private School Kids Caught Banging Hookers in Zambia

CowGoesMoo100

Anyone seen this? Both lads from Belvedere College. They were in Zambia for a charity trip and they snuck out at night and did the nasty with two african whores. One of the hookers said she was "sick". Lads could have HIV. Silly boys.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

TheBoyConor

Them lads gonna need to see a doctor alright ...... When they start suffering carpal tunnel syndrome from all the high fiving

smelly sock

I think they'd only be in danger of hiv if they put it in their bums.

kunst nugget

smelly sock wrote: »

Isnt it where samantha mumba is from?

No. That would be Drumcondra.

gctest50

smelly sock wrote: »

Isnt it where samantha mumba is from?

Samantha Mumba is from Dublin

I suppose if i was from the countryside and was retarded i might think she was from Zambia, but i'm not - so i don't

Fann Linn

kunst nugget wrote: »

No. That would be Drumcondra.

The hookers are safer in Zambia so.

smelly sock

The thing i find really mad about this is that they went to zambia on a trip. **** sake, we were mosney or some kip like thst. Rich peopld i suppose.

smelly sock

gctest50 wrote: »

Samantha Mumba is from Dublin

I suppose if i was from the countryside and was retarded i might think she was from Zambia, but i'm not - so i don't

She has zambian heritage though so wasnt that retarded to suggest it.

[Deleted User]

TheBoyConor wrote: »

In fairness to them, fair fúcks to them for she sheer boldness of nailing two ebony whores in deepest darkest african on school tour. They are legends but the possibility of AIDS and god knows what other jungle knob rot viruses is a bit scary.

But but but..... What if they were underage?? Is that not immoral?

Heres Johnny

Murray TheDemonic TalkingSkull wrote: »

TheBoyConor wrote: »

The reality is that these lads will be legends in their school for a long time to come. They will be those 2 mad lads who nailed the african hookers. Great bunch of lads.

They really wont be. They'll be "those two fcukin eejits"

No they won't.
They'll be legends forever unless they get the AIDS. Which is highly unlikely. Then they'd be idiots but i think legendary status will be bestowed upon them.

If they get AIDS we can't say anything anywayabout them being reckless doing something they shouldnt have done because then that's victim blaming. Just ask George Hook.

Wibbs

smelly sock wrote: »

Depends on the strain of it though. In Africa it is probably more aggressive amd tolerant to antibiotics.

HIV is a virus and like all viruses antibiotics do nothing. Antibiotics are for bacterial infections.

TheBoyConor

They are lads. Not 16 year old girls.

Fann Linn

Heres Johnny wrote: »

No they won't.
They'll be legends forever unless they get the AIDS. Which is highly unlikely. Then they'd be idiots but i think legendary status will be bestowed upon them.

If they get AIDS we can't say anything anywayabout them being reckless doing something they shouldnt have done because then that's victim blaming. Just ask George Hook.

If only they had a 'Johnny'.
Or two.

[Deleted User]

TheBoyConor wrote: »

They are lads. Not 16 year old girls.

So it's OK for 16 year old lads to have sex but not OK for 16 year old girls?

smelly sock

Wibbs wrote: »

HIV is a virus and like all viruses antibiotics do nothing. Antibiotics are for bacterial infections.

Nitpicking.

Obviously i meant anti viral medication.

gmisk

Heres Johnny wrote: »

No they won't.
They'll be legends forever unless they get the AIDS. Which is highly unlikely. Then they'd be idiots but i think legendary status will be bestowed upon them.

If they get AIDS we can't say anything anywayabout them being reckless doing something they shouldnt have done because then that's victim blaming. Just ask George Hook.

Legends?!? come on!

TheBoyConor

Essentially, yes. Girls are at a much higher risk compared to boys where underage sex is concerned. The girls are at a higher risk of abuse and can obviously become pregnant and be left literally holding the baby with their whole education and life plan radically changed from what they and their parents might have wanted.
The same is not true of boys who can, if theyre determined to do so, literally just feck off with little or no consequence and never having so see the girl or child again ever if they don't want to. They must pay maintenance of course, but that is a minor inconvenience compared the impact on the girls life.
That's why it's different.

skooterblue2

bodice ripper wrote: »

Probably medical attention means post exposure prophylaxis

Or a diet of pancakes. Why? Because it is the only thing that they can get under the door

Mookie Blaylock

sabat wrote: »

Unless they barebacked them in the ass they should be ok. I do admire the comradery of bringing the disabled kid out to get hammered and a taste of brown sugar though.

They've been watching Jim Jeffries I see!

fergus1001

seamus wrote:

Yeah, two underage boys might have HIV. This is hilarious.

hahahahahahahahahaha

they have aids, much virus, so fun

skooterblue2

sugarman wrote: »

Of course, but theres posters on here still referring to it as a death sentence / 'throwing away their lives'.

Once its picked up early and you receive treatment/medication you can for the most part go about your every day life without ever having issue. HIV isnt much of an problem in the developed world anymore as many still believe.

Yeah but your kidneys and liver will be burnt out by 60 with all the cocktails of medication you have to take. Anyone with liver problems are usually crancky, always cold and in pain.

Galwayguy35

Wouldn't they have to tell future partners if they do have HIV?

It would be something I would want to know about someone I was going to have sex with.

Fann Linn

Can't see them getting their leg over with the locals near Belvedere on their return.

_Whimsical_

HIV and potential for disease aside, which they should be educated about, there's also the fact they went to an impoverished country to engage in charitable work and instead used local women who are forced into the sex industry because they're impoverished. There's a massive failure of education and of inculcating values of basic decency there. It's not the first time that people have headed off to a country to help and thought using local women and children for sex were part of the perks,there's only recently been a scandal with Oxfam. There's something really cynical about privileged kids who presumably have had months of being taught about the country and its problems, not recognising the contradiction between helping people and then abusing the same cycle of poverty to get their leg over. It's an abuse of privilege. I think there's something incredibly depressing about it. I don't think it's just young lads having fun and exploring natural curiosity in this context. I wouldn't feel the same to hear they'd slept with prostitutes in Dublin for instance. This is a much more serious failure of conscience.

screamer

Wesson Clean Pint wrote: »

Both lads, or their parents, will take legal action against the school for breach of duty. Will be settled out of court I would imagine.

What a lot of absolute bollox the teacher can't wrap them in cotton wool, they were doing wrong they didn't care, the poor teacher I actually feel sorry for him/ her.

screamer

_Whimsical_ wrote: »

HIV and potential for disease aside, which they should be educated about, there's also the fact they went to an impoverished country to engage in charitable work and instead used local women who are forced into the sex industry because they're impoverished. There's a massive failure of education and of inculcating values of basic decency there. It's not the first time that people have headed off to a country to help and thought using local women and children for sex were part of the perks,there's only recently been a scandal with Oxfam. There's something really cynical about privileged kids who presumably have had months of being taught about the country and its problems, not recognising the contradiction between helping people and then abusing the same cycle of poverty to get their leg over. It's an abuse of privilege. I think there's something incredibly depressing about it. I don't think it's just young lads having fun and exploring natural curiosity in this context. I wouldn't feel the same to hear they'd slept with prostitutes in Dublin for instance. This is a much more serious failure of conscience.

Have you never heard the old saying a standing cock has no conscience?

mikeym

Fann Linn wrote: »

If only they had a 'Johnny'.
Or two.

Johnny has you covered

TheBoyConor

A Johnny? As in one? Between them?
Yeah they might be buddies but sharing condoms means basically the same as shooting your glue all over your buddy's mushroom head which is not only super gay but it's just as good a way to get AIDS as barebacking an African street walking tramp whore up the sh!te pipe.

brevity

TheBoyConor wrote: »

Only one Johnny? Between them?
Yeah they might be buddies but sharing condoms means basically the same as shooting your glue all over your buddy's mushroom head which is just as good a way to get an std as barebacking an African street walking tramp whore up the shÃte pipe.

What the **** is the matter with you?

TheShow

Top shaggers??

worded

Wibbs wrote: »

HIV is a virus and like all viruses antibiotics do nothing. Antibiotics are for bacterial infections.

I’d hate to catch that aids again