Beechwoodspark wrote: » all the anti Christian/catholic posters of boards must be really really Reallllly against Islam as it is even more anti women. Different league entirely
blinding wrote: » Is that ok for suicide bombs like the guy at the Arianna Grande Concert ?
suicide_circus wrote: » banning would just make them a subversive mark of defiance and make the women prosecuted into martyrs. there is no doubt that they are absolutely f*cked up and a tool for the subjugation of women but i just dont see banning as the answer.
Edgware wrote: » While we are at it lets ban families taking their daughters from school at 16 and marrying their cousins, then dropping kids for the next 20 years while living in a caravan on welfare
Pinch Flat wrote: » I think because the first one is associated with criminality / bank robberies, the second one not so. Could be wrong though.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Plenty of people do in fact justify FGM on that “it’s their culture” basis. Arguing that it’s a choice to wear a burka is a deflection: people brought up in historically ultra Christian societies often forgo their freedoms in what looked like “choice” but was dictated by the religion they were born to. What gets me about some traditional dress (like the abaya in Saudi) is that’s its mandated as black in an extremely hot country. The men are in white.
Discodog wrote: » We should ban one faith schools & remove any religious ceremony from schools. But we should teach children about all religions & give them the confidence to challenge & decide what they want in adult life.
Discodog wrote: » You progress by educating not banning.
Thestones wrote: » Yes should be banned, like another poster says you see the men swanning around in jeans and tshirts in the modern clothing but the women still have to wear tents! Why don't the men wear traditional clothing aswell? It's such BS! On a side note I was in sandymount recently on a lovely hot day during the summer wearing a short dress while walking with my husband, came across a Muslim family and the woman literally looked me up and down, clearly judging me for wearing a short dress, this boils my blood, how dare these people come to our country and judge women on what they wear, I'll wear whatever the f*** I want in my own country. If they don't like western culture they shouldn't be here, adapt or leave, like we would have to in their country.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Saying “as a personal choice” there is fairly meaningless. Women in Ireland used to go to church as a personal choice but that’s still condemned, in retrospect, as patriarchal.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Do you want this for all women? If not, why then for some.
Malayalam wrote: » I dislike them, have since I first saw them decades ago. They must be so damn uncomfortable. Have been in lots of places where the guys saunter ahead of their wives and they are wearing jeans and teeshirts and sunglasses, while the poor women straggle behind in the oppressive heat under a tent. If you look at the traditional dress of women from Islamic places all over the globe, they are often very beautiful. Sometimes there were masks, used occasionally, but very decorated and the eyes were visible and also decorated so that one could still see the women's beauty, and the masks often served a purpose such as protection against sand blowing. The various flowing scarves and so on of different Islamic cultures are gorgeous too, and the women even look like they have fun being creative with them. These black yokes are horrible, though. Yes they are sometimes voluntarily worn, but having seen more than my fair share of the inside of cults I can attest that women can be just as religiously/politically fervent and fanatical and often even more so than men. Also the whole modern moral relativistic attitude of ''It's their culture and who are we to say...etc.'' is a real cop out. Try that shyte with FGM, or child marriage, or spousal abuse, or enforced marital sex, etc. It seems reasonable to refuse permission for full facial coverings in public places.
blinding wrote: » We are not allowed to go around in Balaclavas = for good reason . Why are some people allowed to go around in a Burka / Niqab ?
timthumbni wrote: » It always amazes me how many people make excuses for Islam and it’s stupid and outdated systems in particular towards its women. Christianity certainly has many faults too (well known now in Ireland regarding the child abuse/laundries scandals etc etc. But it is minor league in comparison to Islam. The left trumpet on about woman’s rights and also lgbtaz rights but seem to forget about this issue when it comes to Islam. I have no idea why that it but it a very dangerous thing to do. There is no place in Ireland or western society for such practices. We need to progress, not regress.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Its equally opressive banning them.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » ireland. Nudity prohibited even on private beaches. No burka ban. France. Plenty of nudity on private beaches and topless bathing on all beaches. Burka ban. Apparently France is far right. Listen, chumps. It’s really not far right to oppose a patriarchal system where women are wrapped up and covered entirely. There’s nothing liberal or feminist about the belief that while you wouldn’t do that to your girlfriend, sister, or white Irish people, it’s fine, it’s a choice for brown Irish people. In fact why pretend to be liberal or feminist at all. You’re not. This is separate to the debate about the banning, we don’t really ban headwear here. There’s a lot of “ what’s wrong with the burka” on this thread.
Pretzill wrote: » Yes they should be banned Europe wide imo - it's oppressive, archaic and the reason they are worn as some pseudo protection of a women's modesty is ridiculous in the 21st century western world - when did we start going backwards?
steve-collins wrote: 100% im surprised no one has tried to rob a bank with one yet.