theballz wrote: » Non-Muslim countries give every freedom to Muslims, but Muslims never give any freedom to their minorities. Denmark have done it, we should too.
Cleopatra_ wrote: » I'm not overly delighted when I see a woman wearing a Niqab, and I see it a lot more here in the UK. It is a sign of oppression to me, even if many of the women who wear it are choosing to do so. However, I'm not really that comfortable with a government banning an item of clothing either, that seems very restrictive too, especially because it most likely alienates these women further.
wakka12 wrote: » Big whoop over nothing its like transgender toilets non issue I have very rarely seen burkas or hijabs in dublin and when I do see them I don't give a fcuk
Rjd2 wrote: » People should be allowed to wear what they want no matter what there religion is.
Richard Hillman wrote: » One of the London 7/7 bombers escaped wearing one of them. The Black Widows of the Moscow Theatre Siege wore them
super_furry wrote: » Richard Hillman wrote: » One of the London 7/7 bombers escaped wearing one of them. The Black Widows of the Moscow Theatre Siege wore them Every lad in the ‘Ra wore white y-fronts. A few lads from the INLA wore boxer-briefs.
timthumbni wrote: » Women in Muslim society are very much second class citizens within their own type. That’s not even a debate. It’s Amazing how many excuses people make.
deco nate wrote: » If a person cannot wear a motorbike helmet in a place for security reasons. Then no one else should be allowed to float that law either. Plain and simple.
RustyNut wrote: » What law would that be? Where is illegal to wear a helmet?
One eyed Jack wrote: » Of course it’s debatable as you’re using Western standards to comment on standards in Muslim societies. You’re basically comparing apples and oranges. If you’re going to attempt to make that comparison then by the same standards, women in Western society are also just as much ‘second class citizens within their own type’.
K.Flyer wrote: » All public buildings and banks etc will have a sign telling motorcyclists to remove their helmet before entering the building. Its for security reasons. Why should anyone else be allowed cover their face beyond recognition entering the same buildings?
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Most fuel stations have it as a condition of sale, if someone arrives clad in the same gear where facial ID is impossible they should also be refused sale on security grounds. Personally I would not conduct business with any company allowing unknown identifiables to conduct sales.
One eyed Jack wrote: » timthumbni wrote: » Women in Muslim society are very much second class citizens within their own type. That’s not even a debate. It’s Amazing how many excuses people make. Of course it’s debatable as you’re using Western standards to comment on standards in Muslim societies. You’re basically comparing apples and oranges. If you’re going to attempt to make that comparison then by the same standards, women in Western society are also just as much ‘second class citizens within their own type’.
RustyNut wrote: » But not illegal, no law?
deco nate wrote: » RustyNut wrote: » What law would that be? Where is illegal to wear a helmet? I'd like you stop posting ****e, how about that. Not illegal, but it would be nice to stop with your crap.
RustyNut wrote: But not illegal, no law?
RustyNut wrote: » I'm sure you'd like people to stop pointing out when you're wrong ok.
Mr. teddywinkles wrote: » As well as that who the fook interacts with the rest of humanity through a helmet.you want integration piss poor way about it