It wasnt me123 wrote: I've now joined that FB page - its hilarious, there are loads of them equally nuts. I haven't stopped laughing since I joined.
Martina1991 wrote: » What's it called?
It wasnt me123 wrote: » thats it, I'm wedding shaming (non-ban happy edition) mostly americans getting married in all sorts of garments with guests in tshirts
JK2015 wrote: » ''Feel so angry right now got refused entry to tons of fun today with my 8 year old because he wouldn't wear socks even though I explained it was a major sensory issue over his autistim still turned us away my little boy who is non verbal and didn't understand had major melt down and hit pinched me because I had to take him back out such a disgrace wasn't going to put this public but could all my friends share just to make other mammies with kids with autism to be aware of it thanks guys he was so so rude to me and my son'' Classic comments, OMG dats disgarceful hun/hope ur OK hun/Ring joe duffy/Niall Boylan etc. Someone commented that it's not discrimination because the rules are meant to be followed by everyone and was told 'If you don't agree with the topic that's been discussed then don't voice your uneducated opinion'
kunst nugget wrote: » Tbf, the original message doesn't say anything about discrimination. Also, I can't see why the rules couldn't have been bent ever so slightly to accommodate an autistic child with sensory issues. Seems pretty crappy tbh.
kildare lad wrote: » Ye s are laughed at any of yous juiced up turkeys wanna go that way be my guest wannabe gansters ill fold yous in half ye s lil pumped up squeirls anyone one of yous in this area try me fools ye s forget ye s are selfs lil muppets ��and that goes for all of yous ****ing muppets in this area ok remmber see all the lil fools whos on juice and think there big men try me fools full of water �� ill break yous in two Lil handie caps in this area with ye s are meet street monclear jakets think ye s are gods gift clowns is wat ye s are
benjamin d wrote: » Moncler jackets and steroids, no way I can afford that! I'm in the wrong game. Skobey drug dealer here I come!
wildlifeboy wrote: » what is monclear jackets?
coolhull wrote: » "Furst day in cresh 4 mi liddle angle. Mi hart is broke" Accompanied by eighteen photos of her 'liddle angle' Let's hope that spelling is on the curriculum.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » You might want to read up on the legal obligation on service providers to provide a reasonable accommodation for a person with a disability.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » AndrewJRenko wrote: » You might want to read up on the legal obligation on service providers to provide a reasonable accommodation for a person with a disability. Presumably the socks thing is to stop the spreading of things like verrucas and other skin things. Do fungus and the like know that a child is autistic and that they shouldn't spread to and from that child?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Dunno much about it - but I'd be surprised if there isn't a reasonable solution that works for both sides if they do a bit of digging.
Bredabe wrote: » that limit is set by the company involved.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » No. It's not set by the company involved. And in many cases, the issues can be resolved at no cost. It is often just a matter of doing things differently, showing a little flexibility. In this case, presuming that the child in question doesn't go out on the street in bare feet, he is able to tolerate some kind of foot covering. A little flexibility would almost certainly be able to find a mutually acceptable solution.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » Presumably the socks thing is to stop the spreading of things like verrucas and other skin things. Do fungus and the like know that a child is autistic and that they shouldn't spread to and from that child?
BattleCorp wrote: » For fcuk sake. Only three words spelled correctly
It wasnt me123 wrote: » It was ridiculous, that poor child can't be the first one ever to turn up with no socks, especially in the summer. All the company had to do was go to pennys, but 10 for half nothing and give the child a pair and have some there for any other child that forgot their socks.
coolhull wrote: » "Furst day in cresh 4 mi liddle angle. Mi hart is broke" Accompanied by eighteen photos of her 'liddle angle' Let's hope that spelling is on the curriculum in the 'cresh'..
It wasnt me123 wrote: » BattleCorp wrote: » For fcuk sake. Only three words spelled correctly I think you are being a little harsh there ..... she got four words spelled correctly! :-)
ohnonotgmail wrote: » the issue was not that the child did not have socks. the issue was that the child would not wear socks due to their condition. At least that is what i took from the post.
SusieBlue wrote: » ‘Too the looneythic who into my son while he wasn evan in the way, hope ur happy u ruined his 1st day back, crying lil one on my hands now happy Friday to me NOT