Candyshell wrote: » That tells me you don't actually enjoy it if you wouldn't choose to have another go.
Shenshen wrote: » So you've no concept of enjoying something, but not wanting to do it again? Interesting.
Autochange wrote: » Do you think some one who has become a quadriplegic or has has been in a fire has a choice to enjoy life?
Candyshell wrote: » If you think life is worth living, it makes sense that you would want to do it again. Read Wibbs' answer, there's someone that enjoys life, and as a result would want to live it again. You must think that the pain/negatives outweighs the positives/enjoyment.
Shenshen wrote: I went on a rollercoaster recently for the first time in my life. It was great fun, but I've done it now, I probably won't be doing it again. That doesn't mean it wasn't fun.
Ray Donovan wrote: » Not really. Low self-esteem which has led to a semi-dependence on alcohol and a stressful job that often keeps me awake at night.
Shenshen wrote: » So unless you enjoy it enough to want to do it again, you're by definition not enjoying it at all? That's a really weird way of looking at it. I went on a rollercoaster recently for the first time in my life. It was great fun, but I've done it now, I probably won't be doing it again. That doesn't mean it wasn't fun.
Candyshell wrote: » You obviously think it's not worth the effort to do it again, so the rollercoster itself was enjoyment but overall on net basis you wouldn't enjoy it when you include travel, cost and queuing. Likewise I'd say in life you might enjoy aspects but overall on a net basis you don't enjoy it. Also, with a rollercoster the element of the unknown is gone the 2nd time. That wouldn't be true of life a 2nd time, because you could live a completely different life.
Shenshen wrote: » I think you'll just have to take my word for it, I do, overall, enjoy it quite a lot. But once it's over, it's over, and I won't regret not getting to do it again. If, on a net basis, I didn't enjoy it, why would I still be around, after all?
Wibbs wrote: » . My personal opinion is that so many of us need to get some perspective in our lives and realise how lucky most of us are.
Taytoland wrote: » If you don't have some struggle in life then it's not a life.
Candyshell wrote: » Just because you are "better off" than 99% of the population doesn't mean you must therefore enjoy life.
Pretzeluck wrote: » Oh you're hard. I destroy the weighs as well but I don't go around saying I'm so awesome.
sbsquarepants wrote: » I completely disagree. I'd be much happier to spend my time on a paradise beach in the Seychelles without so much as a struggle to keep me occupied!
Wibbs wrote: » Funny enough there may be something to the struggle requirement.
Ronin Vast Platoon wrote: » I love and enjoy every minute of life.
Candyshell wrote: » I'd say the same reason as most people who don't enjoy life, habit, maybe a vague feeling of "waiting to start living" which never actually starts.
Shenshen wrote: » *roflmao Honey, you honestly could not be further off the mark. But you know what? If you've decided that I don't enjoy life, based on one forum remark, then who would I be to disagree with you?
Wibbs wrote: » Candyshell wrote: » Anything else is self centred wallowing of the pretty obscene kind. What about meditation?
Candyshell wrote: » Anything else is self centred wallowing of the pretty obscene kind.
Wibbs wrote: » It might not mean you must, but it would be my strong belief that if you have a life better off than 99% of the population, you have a duty to at least try to enjoy it. Anything else is self centred wallowing of the pretty obscene kind.
ToddyDoody wrote: » What about meditation?
spotifiedman wrote: » Typical fallacy of relative privation. Why should I care if someone else has it worse? I'm here and have problems. I want to solve them but I'm not going to feel bad just because someone else is starving..
Wibbs wrote: » Like anything it has positives and negatives. How is it a fallacy? If anything you reinforce my point about that being self centred thinking. You should care if someone has a worse life than you. While nobody is suggesting you feel bad because someone is starving and you are not, you should feel fortunate that you're not. It's pretty basic humans as empathetic social animals stuff. Apparently not, and that goes back to my original point that too many in the modern world have lost that in the Me Generation™. It's not specific to one generation of course. Some have described the 20th century as the century of the self, the 21st I reckon will be looked back upon as the century of the self involved. So far anyway.