KathleenGrant wrote: » The people on this forum are so knowledgeable other people find it difficult to contribute to the same level. I know myself I added to a discussion once or twice and was picked up oby someone straight away. Not complaining, they were right but I won't be as quick to offer it again.
PARlance wrote: » That has never stopped me! I don't think anyone would want for someone not to be posting. If stats aren't correct then they'll be corrected, which is good, but opinions that mightn't be the most obvious can lead to a good debate or rethink.
Cartman78 wrote: » Have been reflecting on PVA in recent days.... Current back 5 is: PVA | Mendy | Robertson | Wan-Bissaka | Peltier Assuming Wan-Bissaka gets his place back post suspension, I'm thinking of.... (drum roll).... ...selling PVA for Alonso and probably playing 4 at the back. Always hate having defensive double ups and Wan-Bissaka basically seems to be PVA-lite. Madness or potential strategic genius??
KevIRL wrote: » Your proposed back 5 is my current one. AWB/4th mid and possibly someone like Ings will rotate the final starting spot.
Dr. Bre wrote: » Has Peltier defo lost his place !
Pogue eile wrote: » I confidently predict that by the seasons end PVA will be Wan-Bissaka-lite ;)
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Sometimes words can hurt....:(
2nd Row Donkey wrote: » budgemook wrote: Finished in top 2250 last year and only really go on gut, form and from what I see in games. Not a stats man at all. I haven't a clue tbh! Top 2250? Where exactly , 2249th?
budgemook wrote: Finished in top 2250 last year and only really go on gut, form and from what I see in games. Not a stats man at all. I haven't a clue tbh!
“Sadio's a very consistent player for us. His work-rate is great,” the manager added. “We have a very strange 4-5-1 formation with Sadio as a midfielder, Bobby [Roberto Firmino] being a midfielder more or less and Mo [Salah] being a striker, even though he plays in a little different position.
siblers wrote: » It's odd he was left out of the squad completely for tactical reasons and the fact they kept a cleansheet without him. Seems like he is well down the pecking order, guess we'll have a better idea come the weekend I wonder if there is more to the story, maybe he was being punished for something
Bleating Lamb wrote: » Am on WC Currently have 0.2 itb Ederson Hamer Mendy Robertson Alonso W Bas Stankovic Salah Mane Pedro Rich Guendouzi Augero Zaha Ings Is Stankovic one of the more nailed on 4m defenders? Same question about Guendouzi as a 4.5m? Will be playing 3:4:3 most weeks. Want to lock in ‘safe’ bench fodder that are unlikely to lose value. Thanks for any opinions on my picks.
Bleating Lamb wrote: » Interesting to see some ‘new’ posters names coming up this Season,they must be longtime lurkers and coming out of the closet this year😀 Admittedly I would not have posted every gameweek over last few seasons but have a decent record of asking questions and offering answers/opinions to other forum posters. That should be the spirit of a forum like this. Personally it pisses me off when you see lads coming in at end of GW 38 saying how they came in top 10k in OR......yet never contribute to the forum all season. I always think to myself ‘mmmmm.....did they really come in top 10k or it just an internet Willy waving effort😜
Deleted User wrote: » Stankovic isn’t nailed but Guendouzi looks more nailed. Stephens, Westwood and Mendy at Leicester look good to me.
IK09 wrote: » I'm not new, but I hold my tongue until I have something worth contributing. I'm the guy who called Harry Kane's rise to fame while Adebayor was starting for Spurs. I'll wait until I have something of value to add to the forum before posting. Otherwise it's just more noise, and nobody likes reading through noise.
Bleating Lamb wrote: » Am on WC Currently have 0.2 itb Ederson Hamer Mendy Robertson Alonso W Bas Stankovic Salah Mane Pedro Rich Guendouzi Aguero Zaha Ings Is Stankovic one of the more nailed on 4m defenders? Same question about Guendouzi as a 4.5m? Open to suggestions on alternative players. Will be playing 3:4:3 most weeks. Want to lock in ‘safe’ bench fodder that are unlikely to lose value. Thanks for any opinions on my picks.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Sounds a bit like a catch 22. Because if you're not posting noise nobody will recognize your username so when you do post something that could be extremely good. It won't hold the same weight as a well known poster posting it if that makes sense.
IK09 wrote: » Ya I understand what you're saying. I prefer the sniper approach over the shotgun approach. I'm not looking for followers lol.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f0f9dcd3c171b8509db497e3a438e4fb.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/2166e486d2270e36003cd1b3e3519b24.svg)